شناسایی عوامل مؤثر بر پیاده‌سازی و استقرار مدیریت دانش در دانشگاه‌های دیجیتال

10.22055/edus.2025.48262.3676
دوره 33، شماره 1
فروردین 1405
صفحه 189-206

نوع مقاله : علمی- پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار مدیریت آموزشی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

2 دانش آموخته کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت آموزشی، دانشگاه تهران، تهران، ایران.

چکیده
با توجه به این واقعیت که دانشگاه‌های دیجیتال فن‌آوری‌های جدیدی را برای اشاعه دانش سازمانی در تمام سطوح سازمانی خود بکار می‌گیرند، نیاز به شناسایی عوامل مؤثر بر پیاده‌سازی و استقرار مدیریت دانش در سازمان خود را دارند. در این پژوهش عوامل مؤثر بر پیاده‌سازی و استقرار مدیریت دانش در دانشگاه‌های دیجیتال شناسایی شد. پژوهش حاضر، کیفی و از نوع داده‌بنیاد با رویکرد سیستماتیک بود. میدان مطالعه 18 نفر از متخصصان و صاحبنظران بودند که به صورت نمونه‌گیری هدفمند و به روش گلوله‌برفی انتخاب شدند. از این 18 نفر مصاحبه نیمه‌ساختاریافته تا مرحله‌ی اشباع داده‌ها گرفته‌شد. یافته‌های پژوهش بر اساس الگوی اشتراوس و کوربین در پنج عامل علی، زمینه‌ای، مداخله‌گر، راهبردی و پیامدها دسته‌بندی شدند. عوامل علی عبارتنداز: فراهم‌سازی زیرساخت‌های سازمانی، توسعه‌ی فرایند مدیریت دانش، دیدگاه آینده‌نگرانه سازمان و اکوسیستم و ساختار سازمانی. عوامل زمینه‌ای عبارتنداز: قابلیت‌های بالقوه سازمان، همگام‌شدن با تحول دیجیتالی و هماهنگی با شرایط روز جهان. عوامل مداخله‌گر عبارتنداز: وجه تمایز نیروی انسانی، عرصه سازمانی، توسعه نیافتگی فناوری اطلاعات، سیاست‌گذاری‌های غالب بر سازمان و مدیریت و رهبری سازمان. عوامل راهبردی عبارتنداز: به‌ کارگیری آموزش‌های لازم در سازمان، به‌کاربردن مشوق‌، فرهنگ‌سازی، مسیر شغلی مناسب، برآوردن منابع مالی لازم، تدارک سامانه‌های نظارت و ارزیابی. پیامدها عبارتنداز: اثرات فردی و اثرات سازمانی. درنهایت مدل پارادایمی ارائه شد. مقوله مرکزی در این مدل پارادایمی "تحول دانش‌مدار دانشگاه‌ها در عصر دیجیتال" می‌باشد. در جهت پیاده‌سازی مدیریت دانش لازم‌است همه‌ی افراد به سهم خود فعالیت کنند؛ اعم از بالادستی‌ها و سیاست‌گذاران، مدیران عالی، اساتید و دانشجویان. بدیهی است که مدیران سازمانی در این امر نقش مهم‌تری دارند. توصیه ‌می‌شود که سیاستگذاران، مدیران سازمانی و اساتید دانشگاهی که در محیط سازمانی دیجیتال یا پیش‌دیجیتال فعالیت می‌کنند از این مدل پارادایمی استفاده نمایند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Identifying Factors Affecting the Implementation and Establishment of Knowledge Management in Digital Universities

نویسندگان English

Mitra Ezati 1
sara shafiei baghbadrani 2
1 Associate Professor, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
2 Master's degree in educational management, University of Tehran, Tehran, Iran.
چکیده English

As digital universities leverage new technologies to disseminate knowledge across their organizations, they must identify the factors critical to effective knowledge management implementation. This study aimed to develop a paradigm model of the factors influencing the implementation and institutionalization of knowledge management in digital universities. A qualitative research design employing the systematic grounded theory approach of Strauss and Corbin was adopted. Eighteen experts in higher education, digital transformation, and knowledge management were selected through purposive and snowball sampling. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews, and sampling continued until theoretical saturation was achieved. Data analysis followed the three-stage coding process of open, axial, and selective coding. The findings identified knowledge-oriented transformation in digital universities as the core category and revealed five interrelated dimensions of the paradigm model. Causal conditions included organizational infrastructure, knowledge management processes, a future-oriented organizational perspective, and adaptive organizational structures. Contextual conditions comprised institutional capabilities, digital transformation readiness, and alignment with global developments. Intervening conditions included human resource competencies, organizational climate, information technology limitations, organizational policies, and leadership practices. Strategic actions involved professional development, incentive systems, knowledge-sharing culture, career development pathways, financial support, and monitoring and evaluation mechanisms. These strategies resulted in both individual outcomes, such as enhanced knowledge competencies, and organizational outcomes, including improved innovation, institutional learning, and organizational effectiveness. The proposed paradigm model provides a comprehensive framework for understanding the institutionalization of knowledge management in digital universities and offers practical guidance for policymakers, university leaders, and higher education practitioners seeking to strengthen knowledge-driven transformation in the digital era.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

  • knowledge Management
  • Digital universities
  • Grounded Theory
Abdullah, M. R., Ahmad Kamsuri, A. H., & Elias, N. (2022). Knowledge management system implementation and the performance of higher education institutions in the developing countries: A conceptual framework. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology, 100(24), 4783–4798.
Ananyin, V. I., Zimin, K. V., Lugachev, M. I., Gimranov, R. D., & Skripkin, K. G. (2018). Digital organization: Transformation into the new reality. Бизнес-информатика, (2 (44) eng), 45-54. DOI:10.17323/1998-0663.2018.2.45.54.
Babaei, M., Ahmadi K., & Vali. (2023). Lived Experiences of Professors Regarding the Structural Challenges of Practicum Courses at Farhangian University During the COVID-19 Pandemic (Online). Educational Sciences, 30(2), 189-212.  DOI:10.22055/edus.2023.44385.3488 [Persian]
Buntak, K., Kovačić, M., & Martinčević, I. (2020). Impact of digital transformation on knowledge management in organization. Advances in Business-Related Scientific Research Journal, 11(1), 36–47.
Chouki, M., Fernandes, V., & Ruel, S. (2022). Knowledge management as a key dimension of digital project integration: Exploring constructs. Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, 25(1), 46–61. https://doi.org/10.1080/16258312.2022.2079957
Diehim, J., Binesh, M., & Beshen, A. (2016). Investigating the impact of information technology on the knowledge management of organizations. New Research in Humanities, 2(2), 21-36. http://noo.rs/yuDcf [Persian]
Fard, M., Kabaran Zadeh Ghadim, M. R., & Haghighat Monfared, J. (2021). Designing a model for digital entrepreneurship development in small and medium-sized knowledge-based companies with an emphasis on resistance economy policies. Strategic Studies of Basij, 24(90), 103-140. DOI:20.1001.1.1735501.1400.24.90.4.4 [Persian]
Farhoudi, F., & Droodi, F. (2008). The need to use knowledgemanagement in increasing the quality level of the activities of modern organizations. Information Processing and Management Research Paper, 24(2), 89-104. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/131098/fa [Persian]
Fickers, A., & Tatarinov, J. (Eds.). (2022). Digital history and hermeneutics: Between theory and practice. De Gruyter Oldenbourg. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110723991
Hijazi, A., & Pournazari, A. (2017). Analyzing obstacles to the successful application of knowledge management in universities (case study: Farhangian University). Management of Training Organizations, 7(1), 169-203. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/394004/fa [Persian]
Hosseinzadeh, P., & Abdollahi, M. (2015). Knowledge Sharing in the Web Age 2. Mehr Book, -(17-18), 80-97. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/482819/fa [Persian]
Jaafari, S. M. B., Shami Zanjani, M., Mahmoudi, S. M., & Yekeh, H. (2019). Presenting the framework for identifying the benefits of knowledge management in the organization using the hybrid method. Management and Development Process; 32(110), 119-153. DOI:10.29252/jmdp.32.4.119 [Persian]
Kianrad, Z., & Andayesh, S. (2025). Investigating the impact of artificial intelligence capabilities on librarians' productivity: The mediating role of knowledge sharing (Librarians of medical university libraries in Tehran). Library & Information Research Journal, 15(2), 32–54. https://doi.org/10.22067/infosci.2025.93694.1240
Mahdiabadi, J., & Edalatiyan, Z. (2025). Investigating the impact of learning management system on students' personal knowledge management with the mediating role of communication skills. Library and Information Science Studies, 15(2), 166–192. https://doi.org/10.22067/infosci.2025.93200.1238
Maleki, D., & Abdulahi, B. (2017). Identifying and investigating the status of effective infrastructures for the implementation of knowledge management in Islamic Azad University, Rabat Karim branch. Educational Management Innovations, 12(47), 97-116. DOI:20.1001.1.20081138.1396.12.3.6.5 [Persian]
Maravilhas, S., & Martins, J. (2019). Strategic knowledge management in a digital environment: Tacit and explicit knowledge in Fab Labs. Journal of Business Research, 94, 353-359. DOI:10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.01.061
Mokhtaripour, M. (2010). The strategic relationship of organizational intelligence and knowledge management: alert organization, constant movement in the field of learning. Management Development, (82), 17-25. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281176106 [Persian]
Nizzolino, S. (2021). Teacher Networking, Professional Development, and Motivation Within EU Platforms and the Erasmus Plus Program: Teacher Networking Dynamics in the Knowledge Society. In Collaborative Convergence and Virtual Teamwork for Organizational Transformation (pp. 195-218). IGI Global. DOI:10.4018/978-1-7998-4891-2.ch010
Pham, N. T., Do, A. D., Nguyen, Q. V., Ta, V. L., Dao, T. T. B., Ha, D. L., & Hoang, X. T. (2021). Research on knowledge management models at universities using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP). Sustainability, 13(2), 809. DOI:10.3390/su13020809
Pourkarimi Havashki, & Ramazani Fini. (2024). Education, Flourishing, and Training: The Relationship and Application of These Concepts in Educational Practice. Educational Sciences, 31(1), 75-102.  DOI:10.22055/edus.2024.45691.3545 [Persian]
Rasuli Tabar, B., Malekian, F., Mosavi, F., & Karamafrooz, M. J. (2024). Presenting the learning organization model in Kermanshah Province Education with the approach of grounded theory. Educational Sciences, 30(2), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.22055/edus.2023.43211.3439
Revere, D., Turner, A. M., Madhavan, A., Rambo, N., Bugni, P. F., Kimball, A., & Fuller, S. S. (2007). Understanding the information needs of public health practitioners: a literature review to inform design of an interactive digital knowledge management system. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 40(4), 410-421.  DOI:10.1016/j.jbi.2006.12.008
Rezagi, M., Baloch, S., & Mohajeran, B. (2022). The role of knowledge management and digital literacy in job performance: The role of organizational learning variable. Journal of Information Management Science and Technology, 8(1), 359-392.  DOI:10.22091/stim.2020.5816.1423 [Persian]
Ruzic, F. (2021). Digital organizations enhancement with information and operational technologies convergence. In M. Khosrow-Pour (Ed.), Encyclopedia of organizational knowledge, administration, and technology. IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-3473-1.ch068
Sarvari, Zerehsaz, Hassanzadeh, Akhshik, & Somayeh Sadat. (2025). Knowledge documentation and sharing in university science and technology parks. Information Management Sciences and Technologies, 11(4), 219-232.  DOI:10.22091/stim.2022.8399.1821 [Persian]
Shami Zanjani, M. (2022). Digital university is a practical tool for the transformation of universities in the digital age. Tehran: Tehran University Press. 10.22054/ims.2024.81975.2522 [Persian]
Soloki, M., Ghorbani, M., Zabihi, M., & Niroomand, H. A. (2020). Designing a Knowledge Management Deployment Model with an Organizational Learning Approach. Iranian Journal of Educational Sociology, 3(4), 19-30. DOI:10.52547/ijes.3.4.19 [Persian]
Sousa, M. J., & Moço, I. (2015). Management in modern organizations: Organizational, innovation, and knowledge management theories. In G. Jamil, J. Poças Rascão, F. Ribeiro, & A. Malheiro da Silva (Eds.), Handbook of research on information architecture and management in modern organizations (pp. 154–179). IGI Global Scientific Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-4666-8637-3.ch007
Taghizadeh Yazdi, M. R., Tahmasebi, R., Emamat, M. S. M. M., & Dehghan, A. (2018). Identification and Ranking of Effective Factors on Talent Attraction and Maintain Using Analytic Hierarchy Process Approach (Case study: University of Tehran). Organizational Culture Management, 16(1), 89-115. DOI:10.22059/jomc.2018.105971.1006075 [Persian]
Taj al-Dini Oranus, S., Mousavi Ali, S., & Shahbani, A. (2010). Knowledge management in the era of Web 2: An evolutionary approach. https://sid.ir/paper/93487/fa [Persian]
Vardasbi, A., Arasteh, H. R., Navehebrahim A. R., & Abdollahi, B. (2023). Identifying and analyzing the missions of the graduate studies. Educational Sciences, 30(1), 61-80. DOI:10.22055/edus.2023.40317.3349 [Persian]