بازمفهوم‌پردازی تعلیم‌وتربیت در پرتو انگاره رابطه‌مند دیویدسن از مفهوم «خود»

10.22055/edus.2025.49635.3757
دوره 33، شماره 1
فروردین 1405
صفحه 155-172

نوع مقاله : علمی- پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری فلسفه تعلیم و تربیت دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی دانشگاه شیراز.

2 عضو هیئت علمی فلسفه تعلیم و تربیت دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی دانشگاه شیراز

3 استاد فلسفه تعلیم و تربیت دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی دانشگاه شیراز

4 استادیار فلسفه تعلیم و تربیت. دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی دانشگاه شیراز

چکیده
هدف این پژوهش، معرفی انگاره رابطه‌مند دیویدسن از مفهوم «خود» و مفهوم‌پردازی تعلیم-وتربیت برآمده از آن است؛ همچنین، بررسی خواهد شد که این مفهوم چه رهاوردهایی برای ساحت-های مختلف تربیت دارد. این پژوهش با روش تحلیلی فلسفی به مفهوم‌پردازی تعلیم‌وتربیت رابطه‌مند و تفسیر و ارزیابی ساحت‌های مختلف آن می‌پردازد. با نظر به آموزه مثلث‌بندی و اصل نیک‌نگری، احتمالاً برجسته‌ترین تبیین از مفهوم «خود رابطه‌مند» از آن دونالد دیویدسن باشد. از نظر وی، مفهوم «خود» حاوی دو مؤلفه است: «رابطه‌مندی با دیگری» که ناظر بر وجه عاقل‌پنداری دیگران برای تفسیر آنان؛ «رابطه‌مندی با جهان» که متناظر با وجه صادق‌انگاری اصل نیک‌نگری است. اگر این مفهوم «خود رابطه‌مند» را مبنا قرار دهیم، تعلیم‌وتربیت نه یک ابزار یا رسانه، بلکه پایه و اساس خودبودگی خواهد بود؛ همچنین، تعلیم‌وتربیت به مفهوم نقد فرهنگی بدل می‌شود. حقیقت و عقلانیت دیگر منحصر به نهادها و افراد خاصی نیست؛ بلکه در شبکه‌ای علّی از روابط میان انسان‌ها و جهان توزیع یافته‌اند. رابطه میان کودک، همسالان و معلمان و نیز رابطه میان مدارس و سایر نهادها به شکل‌گیری هویت متمایز افراد و نهادهای تربیتی می‌انجامد. مهم‌ترین نکته این است که تمام این نتایج، بدون لغزیدن در ورطه نسبی‌گرایی یا نتیجه‌گیری‌های شاذ رخ می‌دهند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Reconceptualizing Education in Light of Davidson's Relational Concept of the “Self”

نویسندگان English

Kamran Shahbazi 1
Mohammad Hassan Karimi 2
Babak Shamshiri 3
Amin Izadpanah 4
1 Ph.D Student of Philosophy of Education, Educational sciences and psychology faculty, university of Shiraz. Iran.
2 Philosophy of Education, Educational sciences and psychology faculty, university of Shiraz. Iran.
3 Philosophy of Education, Educational sciences and psychology faculty, university of Shiraz. Iran.
4 Philosophy of Education, Educational sciences and psychology faculty, university of Shiraz. Iran.
چکیده English

Introduction
The aim of this study is to articulate Donald Davidson’s relational conception of the “self” and to explore its implications for rethinking education. It investigates how an educational framework grounded in the relational self departs from conventional views, highlighting the distinctive nuances and theoretical subtleties embedded in this perspective.
Method
The study adopts a deductive-analytics approach to interpreting Davidson’s notion of the “relational self,” employing philosophical–analytical inquiry to conceptualize diverse dimensions of education in light of this concept. This method involves three interrelated stages: interpreting the concept, developing a conceptual framework for relational education, and evaluating its implications across various educational domains.
Results
Grounded in Davidson’s doctrine of triangulation and his principle of charity in interpretation, the findings suggest that this framework offers one of the most distinctive accounts of the “relational self.” In Davidson’s view, the relational self comprises two essential components: its relation to the other—embodying the rational-supposing dimension of the principle of charity—and its relation to the world—reflecting the truth-supposing dimension of the same principle.
Discussion
From this perspective, education can no longer be regarded merely as a means of social homogenization; rather, it constitutes the very foundation of selfhood. Since the “relational self” is embedded in history, culture, and tradition, education becomes a form of cultural critique directed toward human growth. Truth and rationality are not confined to specific institutions or authorities but are dispersed across a causal network of relationships among individuals, institutions, and their environments. The distinctive identities of both individuals and educational institutions arise from the interplay between students, peers, and teachers, as well as from the interconnections between schools and other social bodies. Importantly, these outcomes are achieved without lapsing into relativism or incoherence, for truth and rationality are understood not as instruments for silencing marginalized voices, but as fundamental principles underpinning self-realization and the educational enterprise.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

  • Donald Davidson
  • Relational Education
  • Relational Self
  • Self
Ahmadizade, H., (2026). “The Possibility or Impossibility of linguistic Incommensurability in Comparative Studies,” Falsafeh, 23)2(, Serial No. 45, 27-47. https://doi.org/10.22059/jop.2025.389819.1006884 [Persian].
Azadmanesh, S., & Khademi, H. S., (2024). "Netizenship and Networked Child: An Educational Reflection on the Concept of Childhood in Generation Z and Alpha." Journal of Educational Sciences (JEDUS), 31(2), 159-184. https://doi.org/10.22055/edus.2024.46847.3595  [Persian].
Baggini, J., (2020). The Philosopher’s Toolkit: A Campendium of Philosophical concepts and Methods. Translation: Kumrun Shahbazi. Tehran: Kargadan publication [Persian].
Bingham, C., & Sidorkin, A. M. (2004). No education without relation. Peter Lang Group.
Davidson, D., (1982). "The Rational Animals." In Davidson, D (2001). Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective. Oxford: Clarendon Press: 85-106. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198237537.001.0001
Davidson, D., (1987). "Knowing One's Own Mind." In Davidson, D. (2001). Subjective, intersubjective, objective. Oxford: Clarendon Press: 15-38. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198237537.001.0001
Davidson, D., (1988). "The Myth of the Subjective." In Davidson, D. (2001). Subjective, intersubjective, objective. Oxford: Clarendon Press: 39-52. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198237537.001.0001
Davidson, D., (1990). "Epistemology Externalised." In Davidson, D. (2001). Subjective, intersubjective, objective. Oxford: Clarendon Press: 193-204. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198237537.001.0001
Davidson, D., (1991). "Three Varieties of Knowledge." In Davidson, D. (2001). Subjective, intersubjective, objective. Oxford: Clarendon Press: 205-220. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198237537.001.0001
Davidson, D., (2001). Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective. Oxford: Clarendon Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/0198237537.001.0001
Derayati, M., (2013). "The Idea of Worldal Human in Donald Davidson Philosophy." Mind, 53: 137-155. https://zehn.iict.ac.ir/article_16394.html  [Persian]
Esmkhani, M. R., (2018). Meaning, Knowledge, and Otherness in Davidson's Philosophy. Tehran: Qoqnoos. [Persian].
Freeman, L., (2011). "Reconsidering Relational Autonomy: a Feminist Approach to Selfhood and the Other in the Thinking of Martin Heidegger." Inquiry: Critical Thinking across the Disiplines. 54(4), 361-383. https://doi.org/10.1080/0020174X.2011.592342
French, S., Bone, E. K., Deneen, C. D., & Prosser, M. (2025). “Reaffirming the importance of relational pedagogies in higher education: educators’ experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic.” Teaching in Higher Education, 30(8), 1991–2008. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562517.2025.2507262
Gergen, K. J. (2011). Relational being: Beyond selfand community. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:osobl 9780199846269.001.0001 
Giles, D. L., (2018). Relational Leadership in Education: A Phenomenon of Inquiry and Practice. Illustrations: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429445583 
Gudaluv, N., (2021). "Interpretation and Rationality: Developing Donald Davidson’s Ideas in International Political Theory". Theoria, 68(167), 39-65. https://doi.org/10.3167/th.2021.6816702
Hinchliffe, G. (2007). “Truth and the capability of learning.” Journal of Philosophy of Education, 41(2), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9752.2007.00559.x 
Karimi Firoozjaei, M., Sharifzadeh, H. & Karamkhani, Z., (2023). “Identify Components of Cultural Education and Its Relationship with Collective Communication Media (With an Emphasis on Virtual Space),” Journal of Educational Sciences (JEDUS), 30 (2), 213-234. https://doi.org/10.22055/edus.2023.44332.3481  [Persian]
Khanjarkhani, M., (2023). “Analytical Investigation of the Phenomenon of Self-Righteous Culture, and the Challenges Facing the Education of the Culture of Diversity: From Ideological Totalitarianism to Reflective Interactions”, Journal of Educational Sciences (JEDUS), 30 (1), 211-234. https://doi.org/10.22055/edus.2023.42996.3434  [Persian]
Kohut, H., (1980). Self Psychology and the Humanities: Reflections on a New Psychoanalytic Approach. Ed & Intro: Charles, B. Strozier. London: W. W. Norton & Company. https://doi.org/10.2307/2505125
Malpas, J., (2015). "Self, Other, Thing: Triangulation and Topography in Post-Kantian Philosophy." Pholosophy Today, 59(1), 103-126. https://doi.org/10.5840/philtoday201412353
Malpas, J., (2024). "Donald Davidson." (E. N. Zalta , Ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2021/entries/davidson
Marcotte, R., (2023). "Suhrawardi." (ed: E. N. Nodelman) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2023/entries/suhrawardi/.
Mejia, A. (2008). “My self-as-philosopher and my self-as-scientist meet to do research in the classroom: Some Davidsonian notes on the philosophy of educational research.” Studies in Philosophy and Education, 27, 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-007-9096-5 
Nasr, S. H., & Leaman, O., (1996). History of Islamic philosophy. London: Routledge.
Noferesti, A., Shabani Vorki, B., & Hosseingholizadeh, R., (2024). “The Evolution of the Educational Organization Concept: Navigating from Turmoil to Enaction,” Journal of Educational Sciences (JEDUS), 31(2), 23-50. https://doi.org/10.22055/edus.2024.45952.3559  [Persian]
Perkins, H., & Stengel, B., (2025). “Relational (Re)Organization: A Case for a Relational Reading of Relational Pedagogy,” Studies in Philosophy and Education, 45, 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-025-10032-5
Porter, K., J., (1998). “Methods, truth, reasons.” College English, 60(4), 426–440. https://doi.org/10.58680/ce19983693
Porter, K., J., (2001). “A pedagogy of charity: Donald Davidson and the student-negotiated composition classroom.” College Composition and Communication, 52(4), 574–611. https://doi.org/10.58680/ccc20011434
Rangarajan, R., (2025). “Relational pedagogy for inclusion in (in)action: Exploring relational encounters in teaching and learning at a rural small school in India,” International Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 132, 102620: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2025.102620.
Reibel, A. R., (2022). Embracing Relational Teaching: How Strong Relationships Promote Student Self-Regulation and Efficacy (Strengthen student ownership of learning with relational classroom practices). New York: Solution Tree Press.
Ritzer, G., (2005). Contemporary Sociological Theory. Translation: Mohsen Salasi. Tehran: Elmi Ltd [Persian]
Rorty, R., (1989). Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511804397
Shahbazi, K., Karimi, M. H., Shamshiri, B. & Izadpanah, A., (2026). "A Rereading of Plato's and Aristotle's Educational Philosophies in Light of Davidson's Concept of the ‘Relational Self’." Philosophy. 23(2), Serial No. 45, 75-97. https://doi.org/10.22059/jop.2025.389644.1006881  [Persian]
Short, E. C., (2018). Form of Curriculum Enquiry. Translation: Mahmoud Mehrmohammadi, et al. Tehran: Samt. [Persian]
Splitter, L. J. (2011). "Agency, thought, and language: Analytic philosophy." Studies in Philosophy of Education, 30, 342–362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11217-011-9236-9 
Styhre, A., (2022). "Agency and the principle of charity: a pragmatist theory of the interaction order." International journal of organizational analysis, 31(8), 2209-2221. https://doi.org/10.1108/ijoa-10-2021-3004 
Urban, P., & Koubova, A., (2019). "Beyond the Individualistic Paradigm of the Self with Donald Winnicott and Carol Gilligan." Journal of Philosophical Studies. 12(36), 170-188. https://www.humanamente.eu/index.php/HM/article/view/300 
Wahlström, N. (2010). "Learning to communicate or communicating to learn? A conceptual discussion on communication, meaning, and knowledge." Journal of Curriculum Studies, 42(4), 431–449. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220272.2010.495163
Zelatov, J., Racine, T. P., Sinha, C., & Itkonen, E. (2008). "Intersubjectivity: What makes us human?" In J. Zlatev (Ed.). The shared mind: Perspectives on intersubjectivity (1–16). Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/celcr.12.02zla