نوع مقاله : علمی- پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 عضو هیات علمی دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز،اهواز،ایران
2 دکتری روانشناسی از دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز،اهواز، ایران
چکیده
پژوهش حاضر به منظور بررسی وضعیت هویت از نظر نحوه توزیع افراد در چهار حالت هویت سردرگم، زودهنگام، مهلت‌خواه و کسب شده در دانشجویان دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز طراحی و اجرا شد. فرضیه اصلی این پژوهش یعنی تفاوت معنی‌دار در فراوانی چهار نوع هویت ذکر شده در کل نمونه و دانشجویان دختر و پسر با استفاده از روش آماری مجذور خی مورد تحلیل قرار گرفت و فرضیه پژوهشی در کل نمونه و در دانشجویان دختر و پسر تأیید گردید. همچنین در ابعاد هویت- اعتقادی و روابط بین فردی در کل نمونه و دانشجویان دختر و پسر تأیید گردید. نتایج با توجه به دیدگاه اریکسون و مارسیا مورد بحث قرار گرفت.
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
A Study and Comparison of Types of Identity in Ideological and Interpersonal Dimensions in Male and Female Students of Shahid Chamran University
نویسندگان [English]
- H. Shokrkon 1
- B. Najarian 1
- M. Omidian 2
- J. Haghighi 1
1 Faculty member of the Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Shahid Chamran University, Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
2 PhD in Psychology from Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran
چکیده [English]
This study was designed to examine the distribution of the University of Shahid Chamran Students’ identities across the four types of identity diffusion, identity foreclosure, identity moritorium and identity achieved. The main hypothesis posited that the students, in general, and male and female students, separately, are distributed differently across the above four types of identity. Chi square analyses confivmed all the hypotheses. The results showed that the hypotheses were confirmed as well for the ideological and interpersonal dimensions were also confirmed. The findings were discussed according to Erickson’s and Marcia’s views.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- identity
- identity disifuson
- identity forciosure
- identity moritorium
- identity achieved
Adams, G.R. & Shea, J.A (1979). The relationship between identity status, locus of control, and ego development. Journal of Youth and Adolesence, 8,
81-89.
Archer. Sally, L. (1989). Gender difference in identity development; issues of process, domain and timing. Journal of Adolescence, 12, 117-138.
Baron, R.A. & Byrne, D. (1997). Social Psychology, Allyn and Bacon. USA.
Bennion Layne, D., Adams, Gerald, R., (1986). A revision of the extended version of the objective measure of ego identity status: An identity instrument for use with late adolescent. Journal of Adolescent Research, Vol.
1, No. 2, 183-196.
Bennion, L., Adams, G. & Huh, K. (1989). Objective measure of ege identity status: A reference manual. unpublished manuscript, university of Guelph.
Berger, E.M. (1951). The relation between expressed acceptance of self and expressed acceptance of other. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,
47: 778-782.
Cronbach, L.J. (1951). Coefficicient alpha and internal structure of test. Psychometrica 16: 297-334.
Crown, D.P. & Marlow, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychology. Journal of consulting Psychology, 24: 3, 349-354.
Block, J. (1973). Conception of sex role: some cross-cultural and longitudinal perspectives. American Psychologist, 28, 512-526.
Douvan, B., Adelson, J. (1966). The adolescent experience, New York: Wiley. Erikson, E.H. (1965). Inner and outer space: Reflections on womanhood in
R.J. lifton (Ed.). The woman in america, Boston: Houghton Mifin 1965. Erikson, E.H. (1959). Identity and life cycle. Psychological Issues, 1, 1-171. Erikson, E.H. (1968). Identity; Youth and crisis, New York: Norton.
Gilligan, C. (1982). In a different voice: psychological theory and women’s development. Cambridge MA: Harvard university press.
Goidhaber, D. (1986). Life-Span human development. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich: New York.
Grotevant, H.D., Thirhecke, W.l. (1982). Sex defference in style of occupational identity formation in late adolescence. Developmental psychology, vol. 18.n. 3, 396-405.
Jesselson, R., Grrnberger, E. & Mcconochie, D. (1977). Phenomenological aspects of psychosocial maturity in adolescence. par II. Girls. Journal of Yoyth and Adolescence, 6, 146-167.
Kalsner, L. (1996). The influence of development and emotional factor on success in college, Higher Education Extension Service Review (HEES): V. 3. No.2.
Katz, P.A. (1979). The developmera of female identity. Sex Roles, 5, 155-178.
Klapp, 0. (1969). Collective Search for identity, Holt, Reinehart and Winston, Inc.
Lavoie, J.E. (1976). Ego identity formation in college students and working youth. Developmental Psychology, 13, 523-524.
Pleck, J. (1973). Masculinity- Femintiy: Current and Alternative paradigms. Sex Role, 1, 161-177.
Marcia, i.E. (1966). Development and Validitation of Ego identity status. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 3, 551-558.
Marcia, J.E. & Friedman, M.L. (1970). Ego identity status in college women.
Marcia, J.E. (1980). Identity and Adolescence. In J.E. Adelson (Ed), Hand book for Adolescent psychology. New York: Wiley.
Marshal, S.K. (1999). Bridging perspective: Conceptualizing fundamental processes of identity across disciplines, srif, 6 A.C.
Muuss, R. (1988). Theories of Adolescence. New York: Random House.
Orlofsky, J.L. (1977). Sex-Role orientation, identity formation, and self esteem in college man and women. Sex-Role, 3: 561-575.
Rosental, D.A., Gurney, R.M. & Moore, S.M. (1981). From trust to intimacy:
A new inventory for examining erikson’s stage of psychosocial development. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 10, 525-537.
SRIF. (1999). Society for research on identity formation, six annual conference-retreat. london ontario canada.
Tzuriel, D. (1984). Sex Role Typing and Ego identity in Israeli, oriental, and western adolescents, Journal of Personality and Social Psyciwlogy. vol. 46,
No. 2, 440-457.
Webster, H., Sanford, N. & Freedman. M. (1955). A new instrument for studying authoritarianism in personality. Journal of Psychology, 40: 73-84.
)