خودمردم‌نگاری آموزشی و کنش انتقادی معلمان در برابر برنامه درسی تمرکزگرا: پراکسیسِ وفاداری به رخداد حقیقت

10.22055/edus.2025.48058.3658
دوره 32، شماره 2
دی 1404
صفحه 217-248

نوع مقاله : علمی- پژوهشی

نویسنده

دانشیار فلسفه تعلیم و تربیت، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان شناسی، دانشگاه شیراز، شیراز، ایران.

چکیده
هدف از این مقاله ارائه نوعی صورت‌بندی جدید از چگونگی مواجهه انتقادی معلمان با برنامه درسی تمرکزگرا در سطح کلاس درس، در نقش یک خودمردم‌نگار آموزشی و در قالب سوژه‌ای انتقادی است. اگرچه در مبانی نظری تحول بنیادین تعلیم‌وتربیت رسمی ج.ا. ایران، ضرورت گذر از نظام آموزشی و برنامه درسی تمرکزگرا مطرح شده اما راهکاری برای آن پیشنهاد نشده و در حد توصیه مانده است. در این مقاله از روش کاوش‌گری فلسفی-انتقادی برای نقد و ردّ برنامه درسی برآمده از نظام آموزشی تمرکزگرا و طرح جایگزینی برای آن با محوریت کنش انتقادی معلمان استفاده شده است. در گام نخست با اتکاء به آرای پائولو فریره ضرورت مواجهه انتقادی معلمان با برنامه درسی متمرکز مطرح شده است. در گام دوم ضمن مروری نظری بر خودمردم‌نگاری آموزشی سه ویژگی 1- معرفت‌شناسیِ تأملی و هم‌آمیخته،
2- آگاهیِ معطوف به تغییر و 3- روایتِ تغییر و بسط آگاهی‌بخشی به عنوان بنیادهای خودمردم‌نگاری شناسایی و معرفی شده‌اند. بدین ترتیب و با اتکا به مفهوم پراکسیس تربیتی، خودمردم‌نگاری به عنوان روشی که تسهیل‌گر مواجهه انتقادی معلمان با برنامه درسی تمرکزگرا است پیشنهاد شده است. در گام سوم برای ارائه یک صورت‌بندی نظری از چگونگی پیوند خودمردم‌نگاری آموزشی و انجام آن از سوی معلمان برای مواجهه انتقادی با برنامه درسی تمرکزگرا، از مفهوم رخداد حقیقت از آلن بدیو، فیلسوف معاصر فرانسوی، استفاده شده است. در این صورت‌بندی نظری، برنامه درسی نامتمرکز به عنوان پیامد نوعی رویه حقیقت مطرح شده است که معلم در آن نقش حیاتی دارد و ضمن وفاداری به رخدادهای کلاس درس و صدای دانش‌آموزان به سوژه‌ای انتقادی، تحول‌آفرین و رهایی‌بخش تبدیل می‌شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Educational Autoethnography and Teachers' Critical Action against a Centralized Curriculum: The Praxis of Fidelity to the Truth Event

نویسنده English

Amin Izadpanah
Associate professor of philosophy of education, School of education and psychology, Department of foundations of education, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Iran.
چکیده English

This article advances a new theoretical formulation of how teachers can critically confront a centralized curriculum at the classroom level by positioning themselves as educational autoethnographers and constituting themselves as critical subjects. In many educational systems, curricula are treated as fixed, prescriptive frameworks that teachers are expected to implement faithfully, thereby limiting their professional agency and interpretive judgment. In the Iranian context, although the national document of Fundamental Transformation of Formal Education calls for a transition beyond a centralized educational system and curriculum, it does not provide a clear methodological pathway for realizing such a transformation. As a result, the call for decentralization remains largely rhetorical. Using a philosophical–critical inquiry approach, this article critiques the epistemological and political foundations of centralized curricula and proposes an alternative centered on teachers’ critical praxis. In the first step, drawing on the work of Paulo Freire, the necessity of teachers’ critical engagement with centralized curricula is articulated. Freire’s concepts of dialogue, conscientization, and praxis frame education as a transformative, ethically charged practice grounded in reflection and action upon the world. From this perspective, teachers are not neutral transmitters of content but historical subjects capable of questioning and reshaping oppressive structures embedded in curricular mandates. In the second step, the article develops a theoretical account of educational autoethnography and identifies three of its constitutive foundations: (1) a reflective and entangled epistemology that situates knowledge within lived experience, (2) a change-oriented critical consciousness aimed at transformation, and (3) narrative as a mode of both self-examination and collective awareness-raising. Grounded in the concept of educational praxis, autoethnography is thus proposed as a methodological and ethical practice that enables teachers to interrogate centralized curricular norms from within their own classroom realities. Finally, drawing on Alain Badiou’s concept of the “truth event,” the article offers a theoretical articulation of how autoethnographic engagement can generate curricular transformation. A decentralized curriculum is understood as the outcome of a truth procedure emerging from classroom events. Through fidelity to these events and to students’ voices, the teacher becomes a critical, transformative, and emancipatory subject who reconfigures curricular practice from within.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

  • Educational Autoethnography
  • Centralized Curriculum
  • Paulo Freire
  • Alain Badiou
  • Truth Event
  • Praxis
Adams, T., Jones, S. H., & Ellis, C. (2015). Autoethnography: Understanding qualitative research. Oxford University Press.
Amin Khandaghi, M., & Dehghani, M. (2011). Reflection on Centralization, Decentralization and Recentralization and Explanation of Their Implications for Iran's Curriculum System: A New Perspective. Foundations of Education, 011(2), Doi: 10.22067/fe.v11i2.2495
Apple, M., & Gandin, L. A. (2001). Paulo Freire. In J. Palmer, L. Bresler, & D. E Cooper (Eds.) Fifty major thinkers on education: From Confucius to Dewey. Psychology Press.
Badiou, A. (2005). Being and Event. (O. Feltham, Trans.). Continuum.
Badiou, A. (2009). On the truth process: Interview with Allain Badiou (Trans. S Najafi). In, M. Farhadpour, S. Najafi & A. Abbasbeigi (Eds.), Allain Badiou: Philosophy, Politics, Art and Love. 143-164. Farhang-e-Saba. [Persian]
Badiou, A. (2002). Ethics: An essay on the understanding of evil. Verso.
Barrow, R. (2015). Giving Teaching Back to Teachers: A Critical Introduction to Curriculum Theory. Routledge Revivals.
Bochner, A. P. (1997). It's about time: Narrative and the divided self. Qualitative Inquiry, 3(4), 418-438. https://doi.org/10.1177/107780049
70030
0404
Bochner, A. P. (2002). Perspectives on inquiry III: The moral of stories. In Mark L. Knapp & John A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (3rd ed., 73-101). Sage.
Ellis, C. (1995). Final negotiations: A story of love, loss, and chronic illness. Temple University Press.
Ellis, C. (2004). The ethnographic I: A methodological novel about autoethnography. AltaMira Press.
Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Historical Social Research/Historische Sozialforschung, 36(4), 273–290. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2303229
Ellis, C., & Bochner, A. P. (2000). Autoethnography, Personal Narrative, Reflexivity: Researcher as Subject. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of Qualitative Research. 2nd ed., 733–768. Sage.
Farhadpour, M. (2004). Alain Badiou and the truth event. Literature and Philosophy Monthly Journal, 89 & 90, 58-71. [Persian]
Fazeli, N. (2018). Essay and teaching: an anthropological approach to the necessity of essay lessons. In, M Nazari (Ed.), Death of the School: Critical Essays on Irabian Education. (79-106). Mashgh-e-Shab. [Persian]
Fazeli, N. (2011). The future of Teachering. Roshd-e-Madreseh Farda, 7(8), 12-21. [Persian]
Feltham, O., & Clemens, J. (2009). An Introduction to Alain Badiou’s Philosophy. In, M. Farhadpour, S. Najafi & A. Abbasbeigi (Eds.), Allain Badiou: Philosophy, Politics, Art and Love. 15-58. Farhang-e-Saba. [Persian]
Freire, P. (1997). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. (New Revised 20th-Anniversay Ed.). Continuum Publishing Company.
Freire, P. (1979). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Trans. S. Daad & A. Birashk. Kharazmi. [Persian]
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. Continuum.
Goodall, B. H.L. (2006). A need to know: The clandestine history of a CIA family. Left Coast Press.
Giroux, H. A. (2020). On Critical Pedagogy (Second Edition). Bloomsbury Academic.
Gutek, G. L. (2020). Philosophical and ideological perspectives on education.Trans. M. J. Pakseresht. 20th edition. SAMT. [Persian]
Habibporgatabi, K. (2014). Sociology of Educational Policy in Iran through Governmentality Lens. Social Development & Welfare Planning, 5(21), 223-284. Doi:10.22054/qjsd.2014.1426 [Persian]
Haggerson, N. L. (1991). Philosophical inquiry: Ampliative criticism. In, Short, E. C. (Ed.), Forms of curriculum inquiry, 43-60. SUNY Press.
Hooks, B. (2003). Teaching community: A pedagogy of hope. Routledge.
Hooks, B. (2000). Where we stand: Class matters. Routledge.
Izadpanah, A. (2023). A Critical Analysis of the Opportunities and Possibilities for Inclusive Pedagogy in the Theoretical Foundations of Iranian Formal Education. Journal of Curriculum Research, 12(2), 256-278. https://doi.org/10.22099/jcr.2023.6964 [Persian]
Izadpanah, A. (2022). Teacher-Focused Dialogical Education: Moving between Centripetal and Centrifugal Positions. Foundations of Education, 11(2), 56-76. Doi:10.22067/fedu.2022.67395.1000 [Persian]
Janesick, V. J. (1991). Ethnographic inquiry: Understanding culture and experience. In Edmund C. Short, (ed.), Forms of Curriculum Inquiry, 101-119. SUNY Press.
Jones, S. H. (2005). Autoethnography: Making the personal political. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), the Sage Handbook of Qualitative Research (763-791). Sage.
Karami, Z. (2022). An analysis on the acquisition of teacher knowledge through narrative inquiry based on the model of Kohler and Mishra. Journal of Educational Sciences, 29(2), 23-42. Doi:10.22055/edus.202
2.39413.3314
Khosravi, R., & Mehrmohammadi, M. (2012). The emergent curriculum: a critical reflection on the concept of predetermined curriculum. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 7(25), 5-26. [Persian]
Madani, S. A. (2022). The Roots of Centralized Curriculum: The Political and Social Concerns of Early Educational Supervisors and the Emergence of Curriculum Studies. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 17(64), 157-188. https://dorl.net/dor/20.1001.1.17354986.1401.17.64.5.1  [Persian]
Masouminejad, R. (2024). Analyzing the concept of reparation narrative in the direction of developing teachers' true self in the curriculum: an autobiographical identity. Journal of Educational Sciences, 31(2), -. doi: 10.22055/edus.2024.46284.3572
Mehrmohammadi, M. (2007). Simultaneous management of decentralization degrees in curriculum development. Journal of Curriculum Studies. 1(4), 1-16. [Persian]
Miller, C. F. (2011). Horton Hears Badiou! Ethics and an Understanding of Dr. Seuss’s Horton Hears a Who!. In, P. R. Costello (Ed.), Philosophy in Children’s Literature, pp. 83-100. Lexington Books.
Nikneshan, S. (2023). Academic Human and Academic Slavery. Journal of Educational Sciences, 30(1), 169-188. doi: 10.22055/edus.2023.42632.3417
Patton. M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd Ed.). Sage Publications.
Piri, M., Attaran, M., Kiamanesh, A., & Hosseinnejad, Gh. (2011). School-centered curriculum, a strategy to decentralize the curriculum planning system. Journal of Curriculum Research, 1(1), 1-27.
Pretorius, L. (2023). A harmony of voices: The value of collaborative autoethnography as collective witnessing during a pandemic. In Research and Teaching in a Pandemic World: The Challenges of Establishing Academic Identities During Times of Crisis (25-33). Springer Nature Singapore.
Riley, A., & Aubrey, K. (2016). Understanding and using educational theories. Sage.
Salsabili, N., et al. (2003). The statement and Charter of Reform in education System of Iran. Ministry of Education. [Persian]
Shahbazi, K., Karimi, M. H., Shamshiri, B. & Izadpanah, A. (2025). Reconceptualizing Education in Light of Davidson's Relational Concept of the “Self”. Journal of Educational Sciences, (), -. doi: 10.22055/edus.2025.49635.3757 [Persian]
Shor, I. & Freire, P. (1987). A Pedagogy for Liberation: Dialogues on Transforming Education. Bergin & Garvey.
Sirotnik, K. A. (1991). Critical Inquiry: A Paradigm for Praxis. In Edmund C. Short, (Ed.), Forms of Curriculum Inquiry, (243-258). SUNY Press.
Sparkes, A. C. (2002). Autoethnography: Self-indulgence or something more? In A. P. Bochner & C. Ellis (Eds.), Ethnographically speaking (209-232). AltaMira.
Starr, L. J. (2010). The Use of Autoethnography in Educational Research: Locating Who We Are in What We Do. The Canadian Journal for New Scholars in Education