Ainley, M., & Ainley, J. (2011). Student engagement with science in early adolescence: The contribution of enjoyment to students’ continuing interest in learning about science. In Contemporary Educational Psychology 36(1), 4–12. Elsevier Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.08.001
Archila, P. A., Gravier, G., Levy, L., Ortiz, B. T., Rodríguez, A., Wilches, L., Truscott de Mejía, A.-M., & Restrepo, S. (2022). Using formal and informal formative assessment to support bilingual argument mapping in university bilingual science courses. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(9), 3420–3435. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2022.2062218
Baniasadi, A., Salehi, K., Khodaie, E., bagheri, K., & izanloo, B. (2022). Construction of a rubric to evaluate fair classroom assessment at the university of Tehran: An exploratory mixed method study. Journal of Educational Sciences, 29(2), 211-234. doi: 10.22055/edus.2022.38188.3261
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
Brookhart, S. M. (2021). How to give effective feedback to students. ASCD.
Chappuis, J., & Stiggins, R. J. (2022). Classroom assessment: Principles and practice for effective teaching. Routledge.
Conn, K. M. (2017). Identifying Effective Education Interventions in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Meta-Analysis of Impact Evaluations. Review of Educational Research, 87(5), 863–898. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44667679
Echazarra, A., Salinas, D., Méndez, I., Denis, V., & Rech, G. (
2016). How teachers teach and stu- dents learn. OECD Educational Working Papers, No. 130. OECD Publishing.
Fink, A. (
2015). How to conduct surveys: A step-by-step guide. Sage Publications
Farnia, Mohammad Ali, Aghdasi, Ali Naghi, and Shushtari, Vadood. (2013). Investigating the Effect of Feedback in Formative assessment on the Academic Achievement of Fifth-Grade Girls in Mathematics in Miyandoab Township in the Academic Year 90-89. Education and Evaluation, 6(24), 67-78. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/183656/fa [in persian]
Fredricks, J. A., Hofkens, T., Wang, M.-T., Mortenson, E., & Scott, P. (2018). Supporting girls’ and boys’ engagement in math and science learning: A mixed methods study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(2), 271–298. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21419
Goeman, J. J., & De Jong, N. H. (2018). How Well Does the Sum Score Summarize the Test? Summability as a Measure of Internal Consistency. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 37(2), 54–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12181
Granberg, C., Palm, T., & Palmberg, B. (2021). A case study of a formative assessment practice and the effects on students’ self-regulated learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 68, 100955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100955
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Hondrich, A. L., Hertel, S., Adl-Amini, K., & Klieme, E. (2016). Implementing curriculum-embedded formative assessment in primary school science classrooms. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 23(3), 353–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2015.1049113
Hwang, G.-J., & Chang, H.-F. (2011). A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students. Computers & Education, 56, 1023–1031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.12.002
Jahanifar, M. (2022). Assessing gender differences in the model of physics academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Sciences, 29(1), 81-102. doi: 10.22055/edus.2022.39113.3300
Kaplan, R., Saccuzzo, D., & Dryer, R. T. A.-T. T.-. (2017). Psychological Testing (2nd ed NV). Cengage. https://doi.org/LK - https://worldcat.org/title/1202457762
Kline, R. B., & Little, T. D. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.
Kline, T. (2012). Psychological testing: a practical approach to design and evaluation (NV-1 onl). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/LK - https://worldcat.org/title/1246500913
Lau, K.-C., & Ho, S.-C. E. (2022). Attitudes Towards Science, Teaching Practices, and Science Performance in PISA 2015: Multilevel Analysis of the Chinese and Western Top Performers. Research in Science Education, 52(2), 415–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09954-6
Lee, C. S., Hayes, K. N., Seitz, J., DiStefano, R., & O’Connor, D. (2016). Understanding motivational structures that differentially predict engagement and achievement in middle school science. International Journal of Science Education, 38(2), 192–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1136452
Lyon, E. G. (2023). Reframing formative assessment for emergent bilinguals: Linguistically responsive assessing in science classrooms. Science Education, 107(1), 203–233. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21760
Mulaik, S. A. (2010). Foundations of factor analysis. Chapman & Hall-CRC.
OECD. (2019). OECD future of education and skills 2030. OECD Learning Compass 2030, 1–146. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/teaching-and-learning/learning/learning-compass-2030/OECD_Learning_Compass_2030_Concept_Note_Series.pdf
New Zealand Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Learning Media. https://nzcurriculum.tki.org.nz/The-New-Zealand-Curriculum.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press. https://nap.nationalacademies.
org/catalog/18290/next-generation-science-standards-for-states-by-states.
Ozan, C., & Kincal, R. (2018). The Effects of Formative Assessment on Academic Achievement, Attitudes toward the Lesson, and Self-Regulation Skills. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 18. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2018.1.0216
Panadero, E., & Lipnevich, A. (2021). A review of feedback typologies and models: Towards an integrative model of feedback elements. Educational Research Review, 35, 100416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100416
Rae, G. (2008). A note on using alpha and stratified alpha to estimate the reliability of a test composed of item parcels. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61(2), 515–525. https://doi.org/10.1348/000711005X72485
Schildkamp, K., van der Kleij, F. M., Heitink, M. C., Kippers, W. B., & Veldkamp, B. P. (2020). Formative assessment: A systematic review of critical teacher prerequisites for classroom practice. International Journal of Educational Research, 103, 101602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101602
Shepard, L. A. (2013). Foreword. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. ix–xxii). SAGE: US.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson. http://queens.ezp1.qub.ac.uk/login?url=http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/qub/detail.action?docID=5581921
Wan, Z. H., & Lee, J. C. K. (2017). Hong Kong secondary school students’ attitudes towards science: a study of structural models and gender differences. International Journal of Science Education, 39(5), 507–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1292015
Waxman, H. C., Wang, M. C., Anderson, K. A., & Walberg, H. J. (1985). Adaptive education and student outcomes: A quantitative synthesis. The Journal of Educational Research, 78(4), 228–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1985.10885607
Wentzel, K. R. (2021). Chapter Six – Motivational decision-making in achievement settings: A competence-in-context approach. In A. J. Elliot (Ed.), Advances in motivation science, 8, 245–284. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2020.06.002.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2020). Chapter Five - 35 years of research on students’ subjective task values and motivation: A look back and a look forward (A. J. B. T.-A. in M. S. Elliot (ed.); 7, 161–198. Elsevier. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2019.05.002
Wolf, E. J., Harrington, K. M., Clark, S. L., & Miller, M. W. (2013). Sample Size Requirements for Structural Equation Models: An Evaluation of Power, Bias, and Solution Propriety. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(6), 913–934. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413495237
Woods-McConney, A., Oliver, M. C., McConney, A., Schibeci, R., & Maor, D. (2014). Science Engagement and Literacy: A retrospective analysis for students in Canada and Australia. International Journal of Science Education, 36(10), 1588–1608. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.871658
Yan, Z., King, R. B., & Haw, J. Y. (2021). Formative assessment, growth mindset, and achievement: examining their relations in the East and the West. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 28(5–6), 676–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2021.1988510
Yadgarzadeh, Gholamreza. (2007). The Effect of Formative Assessment Methods on the Academic Achievement of Fourth-Grade Elementary School Students in Science. Behavioral Research, 14(27), 67-80. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/448930/fa [persian]
Yin, X., & Buck, G. (2015). There is another choice: an exploration of integrating formative assessment in a Chinese high school chemistry classroom through collaborative action research. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9572-5
Zhang, Y., Zhan, Y., Wan, Z. H., & Sun, D. (2023). What are the effects of formative assessment on students’ science learning motivational beliefs and behaviours? Comparison between Western and East Asian learners. International Journal of Science Education, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2262728