Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Assistant Professor, Department of Education, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Ahvaz, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Educational Sciences, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran.

3 M. A. in psychology, Elementary school teacher, Ahvaz education office zone 1, Ahvaz, Iran

10.22055/edus.2024.47515.3630

Abstract

Introduction
This study delves into the critical role of formative assessment in enhancing students' science learning behaviours. By focusing on the process of learning rather than solely on the result, formative assessment provides valuable insights for both teachers and students to improve instruction and learning. The research emphasizes the interconnectedness of Formative Assessment, motivational beliefs, and science learning behaviors.
 
Method
The study employed a quantitative, correlational research design using structural equation modeling. A sample of 469 Iranian secondary school students was selected to investigate the relationships among formative assessment, motivational beliefs, and science learning behaviors. Data was collected through online questionnaires.
 
Results
The results of this research underscore the significant impact of formative assessment on students' science learning behaviors. Key findings include: Direct and Indirect Effects: Formative assessment exerts both direct and indirect influences on science learning behaviors, with motivational beliefs serving as a mediating variable. Teacher Feedback: Timely and specific teacher feedback plays a pivotal role in strengthening students' motivational beliefs, such as self-efficacy and value placed on the subject. Motivational Beliefs: Students with stronger motivational beliefs are more likely to be engaged in learning, exert greater effort, and perform better in science. Formative Assessment Techniques: The use of various formative assessment techniques, including questioning, short quizzes, and projects, contributes to students' awareness of their progress and enables them to adjust their learning strategies. Combination of Strategies: Combining formative assessment strategies with efforts to strengthen motivational beliefs can create a more effective science learning environment.
 
Conclusion
The research highlights the importance of teacher training in providing effective feedback. By equipping teachers with the skills to offer timely and specific feedback, educators can significantly enhance student learning outcomes. Additionally, the study emphasizes the need for a balance between teacher-centered and student-centered approaches. While adaptive teaching can be beneficial, it is crucial to ensure that instructional strategies align with students' individual needs and learning styles, Teacher Training: Educators should receive training on effective formative assessment strategies, including providing timely and specific feedback. Curriculum Development: Curricula should be designed to incorporate formative assessment as an integral component of instruction. Educational Policy: Educational policies should support the implementation of formative assessment practices in schools. While the study provides valuable insights, it is essential to acknowledge its limitations. The study was conducted with a specific population in Iran, and the findings may not be generalizable to other contexts. Future research could explore the impact of formative assessment in different cultural and educational settings. Additionally, longitudinal studies could provide more in-depth insights into the long-term effects of formative assessment on student outcomes. This research underscores the pivotal role of formative assessment in enhancing science learning behaviors. By implementing effective formative assessment practices, educators can create more engaging and effective learning environments for their students. Future research should continue to investigate the complexities of formative assessment and its impact on student learning.

Keywords

Ainley, M., & Ainley, J. (2011). Student engagement with science in early adolescence: The contribution of enjoyment to students’ continuing interest in learning about science. In Contemporary Educational Psychology 36(1), 4–12. Elsevier Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.08.001
Archila, P. A., Gravier, G., Levy, L., Ortiz, B. T., Rodríguez, A., Wilches, L., Truscott de Mejía, A.-M., & Restrepo, S. (2022). Using formal and informal formative assessment to support bilingual argument mapping in university bilingual science courses. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 25(9), 3420–3435. https://doi.org/10.1080/13670050.2022.2062218
Baniasadi, A., Salehi, K., Khodaie, E., bagheri, K., & izanloo, B. (2022). Construction of a rubric to evaluate fair classroom assessment at the university of Tehran: An exploratory mixed method study. Journal of Educational Sciences, 29(2), 211-234. doi: 10.22055/edus.2022.38188.3261
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 21(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-008-9068-5
Brookhart, S. M. (2021). How to give effective feedback to students. ASCD.
Chappuis, J., & Stiggins, R. J. (2022). Classroom assessment: Principles and practice for effective teaching. Routledge.
Conn, K. M. (2017). Identifying Effective Education Interventions in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Meta-Analysis of Impact Evaluations. Review of Educational Research, 87(5), 863–898. http://www.jstor.org/stable/44667679
Echazarra, A., Salinas, D., Méndez, I., Denis, V., & Rech, G. (2016). How teachers teach and stu- dents learn. OECD Educational Working Papers, No. 130. OECD Publishing.
Fink, A. (2015). How to conduct surveys: A step-by-step guide. Sage Publications
Farnia, Mohammad Ali, Aghdasi, Ali Naghi, and Shushtari, Vadood. (2013). Investigating the Effect of Feedback in Formative assessment on the Academic Achievement of Fifth-Grade Girls in Mathematics in Miyandoab Township in the Academic Year 90-89. Education and Evaluation, 6(24), 67-78. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/183656/fa [in persian]
Fredricks, J. A., Hofkens, T., Wang, M.-T., Mortenson, E., & Scott, P. (2018). Supporting girls’ and boys’ engagement in math and science learning: A mixed methods study. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 55(2), 271–298. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.21419
Goeman, J. J., & De Jong, N. H. (2018). How Well Does the Sum Score Summarize the Test? Summability as a Measure of Internal Consistency. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 37(2), 54–63. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/emip.12181
Granberg, C., Palm, T., & Palmberg, B. (2021). A case study of a formative assessment practice and the effects on students’ self-regulated learning. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 68, 100955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stueduc.2020.100955
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The Power of Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81–112. https://doi.org/10.3102/003465430298487
Hondrich, A. L., Hertel, S., Adl-Amini, K., & Klieme, E. (2016). Implementing curriculum-embedded formative assessment in primary school science classrooms. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 23(3), 353–376. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2015.1049113
Hwang, G.-J., & Chang, H.-F. (2011). A formative assessment-based mobile learning approach to improving the learning attitudes and achievements of students. Computers & Education, 56, 1023–1031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.12.002
Jahanifar, M. (2022). Assessing gender differences in the model of physics academic self-concept. Journal of Educational Sciences, 29(1), 81-102. doi: 10.22055/edus.2022.39113.3300
Kaplan, R., Saccuzzo, D., & Dryer, R. T. A.-T. T.-. (2017). Psychological Testing (2nd ed NV). Cengage. https://doi.org/LK - https://worldcat.org/title/1202457762
Kline, R. B., & Little, T. D. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press.
Kline, T. (2012). Psychological testing: a practical approach to design and evaluation (NV-1 onl). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/LK - https://worldcat.org/title/1246500913
Lau, K.-C., & Ho, S.-C. E. (2022). Attitudes Towards Science, Teaching Practices, and Science Performance in PISA 2015: Multilevel Analysis of the Chinese and Western Top Performers. Research in Science Education, 52(2), 415–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-020-09954-6
Lee, C. S., Hayes, K. N., Seitz, J., DiStefano, R., & O’Connor, D. (2016). Understanding motivational structures that differentially predict engagement and achievement in middle school science. International Journal of Science Education, 38(2), 192–215. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2015.1136452
Lyon, E. G. (2023). Reframing formative assessment for emergent bilinguals: Linguistically responsive assessing in science classrooms. Science Education, 107(1), 203–233. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21760
Mulaik, S. A. (2010). Foundations of factor analysis. Chapman & Hall-CRC.
OECD. (2019). OECD future of education and skills 2030. OECD Learning Compass 2030, 1–146. https://www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/teaching-and-learning/learning/learning-compass-2030/OECD_Learning_Compass_2030_Concept_Note_Series.pdf
New Zealand Ministry of Education. (2007). The New Zealand curriculum. Learning Media. https://nzcurriculum.tki.org.nz/The-New-Zealand-Curriculum.
NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next generation science standards: For states, by states. The National Academies Press. https://nap.nationalacademies.
org/catalog/18290/next-generation-science-standards-for-states-by-states.
Ozan, C., & Kincal, R. (2018). The Effects of Formative Assessment on Academic Achievement, Attitudes toward the Lesson, and Self-Regulation Skills. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice, 18. https://doi.org/10.12738/estp.2018.1.0216
Panadero, E., & Lipnevich, A. (2021). A review of feedback typologies and models: Towards an integrative model of feedback elements. Educational Research Review, 35, 100416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2021.100416
Rae, G. (2008). A note on using alpha and stratified alpha to estimate the reliability of a test composed of item parcels. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 61(2), 515–525. https://doi.org/10.1348/000711005X72485
Schildkamp, K., van der Kleij, F. M., Heitink, M. C., Kippers, W. B., & Veldkamp, B. P. (2020). Formative assessment: A systematic review of critical teacher prerequisites for classroom practice. International Journal of Educational Research, 103, 101602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101602
Shepard, L. A. (2013). Foreword. In J. H. McMillan (Ed.), SAGE handbook of research on classroom assessment (pp. ix–xxii). SAGE: US.
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2019). Using multivariate statistics. Pearson. http://queens.ezp1.qub.ac.uk/login?url=http://ebookcentral.proquest.com/lib/qub/detail.action?docID=5581921
Wan, Z. H., & Lee, J. C. K. (2017). Hong Kong secondary school students’ attitudes towards science: a study of structural models and gender differences. International Journal of Science Education, 39(5), 507–527. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2017.1292015
Waxman, H. C., Wang, M. C., Anderson, K. A., & Walberg, H. J. (1985). Adaptive education and student outcomes: A quantitative synthesis. The Journal of Educational Research, 78(4), 228–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1985.10885607
Wentzel, K. R. (2021). Chapter Six – Motivational decision-making in achievement settings: A competence-in-context approach. In A. J. Elliot (Ed.), Advances in motivation science, 8, 245–284. Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2020.06.002.
Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2020). Chapter Five - 35 years of research on students’ subjective task values and motivation: A look back and a look forward (A. J. B. T.-A. in M. S. Elliot (ed.); 7, 161–198. Elsevier. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2019.05.002
Wolf, E. J., Harrington, K. M., Clark, S. L., & Miller, M. W. (2013). Sample Size Requirements for Structural Equation Models: An Evaluation of Power, Bias, and Solution Propriety. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 73(6), 913–934. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164413495237
Woods-McConney, A., Oliver, M. C., McConney, A., Schibeci, R., & Maor, D. (2014). Science Engagement and Literacy: A retrospective analysis for students in Canada and Australia. International Journal of Science Education, 36(10), 1588–1608. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2013.871658
Yan, Z., King, R. B., & Haw, J. Y. (2021). Formative assessment, growth mindset, and achievement: examining their relations in the East and the West. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 28(5–6), 676–702. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2021.1988510
Yadgarzadeh, Gholamreza. (2007). The Effect of Formative Assessment Methods on the Academic Achievement of Fourth-Grade Elementary School Students in Science. Behavioral Research, 14(27), 67-80. SID. https://sid.ir/paper/448930/fa [persian]
Yin, X., & Buck, G. (2015). There is another choice: an exploration of integrating formative assessment in a Chinese high school chemistry classroom through collaborative action research. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-014-9572-5
Zhang, Y., Zhan, Y., Wan, Z. H., & Sun, D. (2023). What are the effects of formative assessment on students’ science learning motivational beliefs and behaviours? Comparison between Western and East Asian learners. International Journal of Science Education, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2262728