نوع مقاله : علمی- پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکترای مدیریت آموزشی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، ایران.

2 استاد مبانی تعلیم و تربیت، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران.

3 دانشیار مدیریت آموزشی، دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روانشناسی، دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، ایران.

10.22055/edus.2024.45952.3559

چکیده

در این مقاله با روش استنتاج منطقی روند تحول مفهوم سازمان آموزشی از زمان یونان باستان تاکنون مورد بررسی قرار گرفته، آنگاه بر پایه رویکرد عصب پدیدارشناسی معنای بدیل سازمان آموزشی ارائه شده است. بنابراین نخست تصریح شده است سازمان آموزشی در طول تاریخ دو دوره سایه (پریشانی) و وابستگی را پشت سرگذاشته است. در دوره اول که پیش از انقلاب صنعتی است سازمان آموزشی هنوز مشخصه‌های معین خود را ظاهر نکرده‌ و آموزش به صورت پراکنده توسط نهادها و افراد مختلف صورت می‌پذیرفت. بعد از انقلاب صنعتی و پیدایش سازمان‌های مختلف، سازمان آموزشی متاثر از نظریه‌های مدیریت و سازمان دولتی و صنعتی، ساختار و تعریف نسبتاً مشخصی دارد. در نتیجه  مفهوم آن با پایه همین نظریه‌ها تبیین شده است. در ادامه با بررسی سازمان آموزشی تکاپوآفرین که برآمده از نظریه عصب پدیدارشناسی به یادگیری و شناخت است، به مفهومی بدیل از سازمان آموزشی پرداخته شد. در این تعریف عنصر «مکان» در محیط و جامعه بسط یافته، عنصر«زمان» محدودیت خود را از دست داده، عنصر «یادگیرنده» مبتنی بر شرایط، مسیر، زمان و مکان یادگیری تعریف شده ، عنصر «معلم» صرفاً یک انسان استخدام‌شده تلقی نشده و هر کس یا حتی چیزی است که فرایند یادگیری را برای شاگرد تسهیل کند و «روش آموزش-رهبری سازمان آموزشی» با تغییر از ایستایی به پویایی، از تک صدایی به چند صدایی و از تمرکز گرایی به تمرکز زدایی دچار تحول می‌شود. سازمان ‌آموزشی تکاپوآفرین در پی آن است که عنصرهای «انسانیت» و «زندگی» را به عرصه آموزش و پرورش برگرداند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The Evolution of the Educational Organization Concept: Navigating from Turmoil to Enaction

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ali Noferesti 1
  • Bakhtiar Shabani Varaki 2
  • Rezvan Hosseingholizadeh 3

1 PhD candidate, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad., Iran.

2 Professor, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.

3 Associate Professor, Faculty of Education and Psychology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad., Iran.

چکیده [English]

Introduction
Throughout the history of human societies, the educational organization has served as a fundamental framework for managing teaching and learning processes. From ancient Greece to the present day, it has evolved through two distinct periods, each heavily influenced by the industrial revolution. However, in today's rapidly changing society, characterized by the repercussions of the industrial revolution, we are confronted with new challenges and complexities that necessitate a critical reevaluation of this foundational concept.
 
Method
Using logical inference as the primary research method, our study embarked on two key phases. Firstly, a comprehensive review of historical documents was conducted to trace the evolution of the educational organization concept from ancient Greece to the modern era. Subsequently, employing the conceptual analysis method, we synthesized insights to propose a novel framework for conceptualizing educational organizations.
 
Results
This article delves into the evolutionary trajectory of the educational organization concept from ancient Greece to the present day. Furthermore, it introduces an alternative interpretation of educational organization through the lens of neurophenomenology. Initially, the study highlights two distinct historical periods characterized by ambiguity and dependence for educational organizations. Preceding the industrial revolution, educational structures lacked definitive characteristics, with education being dispersed among various institutions and individuals. Post-industrial revolution, influenced by management theories and governmental and industrial organizations, educational organization acquired a more defined structure and purpose, as elucidated through relevant theories. Subsequently, the discourse shifts towards exploring a novel conception of educational organization, grounded in the creative insights of neurophenomenological approaches to learning and cognition.
 
Discussion
With our redefined concept of educational organization, we observe a significant expansion in the role of "place" within the broader context of environment and society. Meanwhile, the traditional constraints of "time" are rendered obsolete, allowing for more flexible learning experiences. The notion of the "learner" is no longer confined but rather shaped by the dynamic interplay of conditions, paths, and the temporal and spatial dimensions of learning. Similarly, the conventional perception of the "teacher" extends beyond a mere hired individual to encompass anyone or anything that facilitates the learning journey for students. Moreover, the teaching-leadership paradigm of educational organizations undergoes a profound shift from static to dynamic, monophonic to polyphonic, and centralization to decentralization. This transformative approach epitomizes the ethos of innovative educational organizations, which aim to reintegrate the fundamental elements of "humanity" and "life" into the educational landscape.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • educational organization
  • organization's shadow era
  • dependence era
  • enaction era
Alagheband, A. (2002). Theoretical Foundations and Principles of Educational Management. Ravan. [Persian]
Andrieu, B. (2006). Brains in the Flesh. Prospects for a Neurophenomenology. Janus Head, 9(1), 129–149. https://hal.science/hal-00447809
Ashrafzade, T., Mesrabadi, J., Yarigholi, B., & Sheikhalizade, S. (2023). Meta-analysis of the Impact of Cooperative Learning on Academic Performance. Journal of Educational Sciences (JEDUS), 30(2), 17-40. https://doi.org/10.22055/edus.2023.43488.3448 [Persian]
Bayat, M., & Molashahi, M. R. (2023). Investigating the Process of Dropping out and Staying out of Education in Education. [Persian]
Boyan, N. J. (1988). Handbook of research on educational administration: A project of the American Educational Research Association. Longman Pub Group.
Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (2019). Sociological Paradigms and Organisational Analysis: Elements of the Sociology of Corporate Life. Routledge.
Bush, T. (2006). Theories of educational management. the National Council of the Professors of Educational Administration (NCPEA).
Bush, T. (2015). Organisation theory in education: how does it inform school leadership? Journal of Organizational Theory in Education, 1(1), 35–47. https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/output/749567/organisation-theory-in-education-how-does-it-inform-school-leadership
Carnoy, M., & Levin, H. M. (1989). The Limits of Educational Reform. Nashr Rooz.
Clark, A. (2008). Supersizing the Mind: Embodiment, Action, and Cognitive Extension. Oxford University Press.
Connell, W. F. (1990). A History of Education in the Twentieth Century World. Nashr Markaz.
Cubberley, E. P. (2005). The History Of Education. Project Gutenberg.
Dobuzinskis, L. (1997). Historical and Epistemological Trends in Public Administration. Journal of Management History, 3(4), 298–316. https://doi.org/10.1108/13552529710191144
Donmoyer, R., Imber, M., & Scheurich, J. J. (1995). The Knowledge Base in Educational Administration: Multiple Perspectives. SUNY Press.
Ewing, M., & Sadler, T. D. (2020). Socio-scientific Issues Instruction. The Science Teacher, 88(2), 18–21. https://www.nsta.org/science-teacher/science-teacher-novemberdecember-2020/socio-scientific-issues-instruction
Fishman-Weaver, K. (2017). A call to praxis: Using gendered organizational theory to center radical hope in schools. Journal of Organizational Theory in Education, 2(1), 1–14. https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/A-Call-to-Praxis%3A-Using-Gendered-Organizational-to-Fishman-Weaver/de411aa6d5043d1320b9e5d7868ef41dbe120060
Furman, G. (2002). School as Community: From Promise to Practice. State University of New York Press.
Gallagher, S. (2017). Theory, practice and performance. Connection Science, 29(1), 106–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540091.2016.1272098
Garbandi, M. (2022, September 12). Classlessness in the ratio of teacher to student. Javan Newspaper. [Persian]
Greenfield, T., & Rabbins, P. (2005). Greenfield on educational administration: towards a humane science. Routledge.
Hall, R. (2002). Organizations: Structures, Processes, and Outcomes (8th ed.). Prentice Hall.
Hare, D. (1996). Theory development in educational administration. the Faculty of the Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University.
Heck, R. H., & Hallinger, P. (2005). The Study of Educational Leadership and Management: Where Does the Field Stand Today? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 33(2), 229–244. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143205051055
Holmqvist, M. (2019). Lack of Qualified Teachers: A Global Challenge for Future Knowledge Development. In R. B. Monyai (Ed.), Teacher Education in the 21st Century (p. Ch. 4). IntechOpen.
Hooshmand, A., Shabani Varaki, B., Aminkhandaghi, M., & Moghimi, A. (2021). From Theorizing to Co-theorizing in Curriculum: A Neuro-phenomenological Turn. Journal of Higher Education Curriculum Studies, 11(22), 7–47. https://dor.isc.ac/dor/20.1001.1.25382241.1399.11.22.2.3 [Persian]
Hosseingholizadeh, R., Ahanchian, M. R., Noferesti, A., & Kouhsari, M. (2017). A History of Educational Management Thought with Regards to International Experiences. Journal of Foundations of Education, 6(2), 128–152. https://doi.org/10.22067/fedu.v6i2.60913 [Persian]
Howley, C., & Sturges, K. M. (2018). Building Capacity in State Education Agencies: Using Organizational Theory to Guide Technical Assistance. Journal of Organizational Theory in Education, 3(1), 1–19. https://web.stanford.edu/group/ojs-jote/cgi-bin/ojs2/index.php/jote/article/view/29
Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2013). Educational Administration: Theory, Research, and Practice. McGraw-Hill.
Jaberouti, N., & Bagherimajd, R. (2023). Canonical analysis of Lifelong Learning on Teachers' Professional Development. Journal of Educational Sciences (JEDUS), 30(1), 127-144. https://doi.org/10.22055/edus.2022.42154.3399 [Persian]
Kardan, A. M. (1998). The State of Education and Related Knowledge at the End of the 20th Century. Methodology of Social Sciences and Humanities , 4(14), 62–53. https://method.rihu.ac.ir/article_701.html [Persian]
Lakomski, G. (1987). Critical Theory and Educational Administration. Journal of Educational Administration, 25(1), 85– 100. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb009927
Li, Q., & Winchester, I. (2014). Enactivism and Freedom Education. AVANT. The Journal of the Philosophical-Interdisciplinary Vanguard, V(2), 113–136. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb009927 
Marshall, C. (2004). Social Justice Challenges to Educational Administration: Introduction to A Special Issue. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(1), 3–13. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X03258139
Mialaret, G., & Vial, J. (1992a). World History of Education (Vol. 2). Astan Quds Razavi Cultural Deputy.
Mialaret, G., & Vial, J. (1992b). World History of Education (Vol. 1). Astan Quds Razavi Cultural Deputy.
Mojtahedi, K., Hesamifar, A., Ilkhani, M., Kalbasi, H., Talebzadeh, H., & Ilkhani, S. (2001). Islamic and Western Schools and Universities in the Middle Ages. Research Institute of Humanities and Cultural Studies. [Persian]
Monroe, P. (1923). A Brief Course in the History of Education. The Macmillan Co.
Murnane, R. J., & Steele, J. L. (2007). What Is the Problem? The Challenge of Providing Effective Teachers for All Children. The Future of Children, 17(1), 15–43. https://doi.org/10.1353/foc.2007.0010
Nozari, H. (2000). The Formulation of Modernity and Post-modernity: the Foundations of Historical Formation and the Fields of Social Evolution. Naghsh Jahan. [Persian]
Oplatka, I. (2008). The field of educational management. Management in Education, 22(3), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020608093256
Orlosky, D. E., McCleary, L. E., Shapiro, A., & Webb, L. D. (1984). Educational Administration Today. Charles E. Merrill Publishing.
Özdemir, M. (2011). Educational Administration: A Science at the Intersection of Public Administration and Business Administration. Amme Idaresi Dergisi, 44(2), 29–42. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/289854060
Papa, R. (2009). The Discipline of Education Administration: Crediting The Past. Educational Leadership and Administration, 2, 5–22. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/237539282
Parker, A. (2023, March). College Dropout Rate (Detailed 107 Statistics for 2023). Prosperity for All.
Robbins, S. P. (2016). Organization theory: structure, design and applications. Saffar.
Roshanghias, P., Liaghatdar, M. J., Zamani, B. E., & Sharifian, F. (2021). Development and Validation of a Lifelong Learning-Based Curriculum Assessment Scale in Higher Education. Journal of Educational Sciences (JEDUS), 28(1), 43-66. https://doi.org/10.22055/edus.2020.32824.2998  [Persian]
Seeley, L. (1914). History of Education. American Book Company.
Shabani Varaki, B., & Javidi Kalateh Jafarabadi, T. (2020). Educational Research Methodology Inspired by the Theory of Enaction. The New Educational Review, 62(4), 141–156. http://dx.doi.org/10.15804/tner.2020.62.4.12
Shams, G. (2011). Educational Administration. Azar. [Persian]
Sharafi, H., Shabani Varaki, B., Abdekhodaei, M. S., & Moghimi, A. (2019). A Holographic Teaching-Learning Environment: Beyond Neuro-philosophy and Towards Neuro-phenomenology of Education. Philosophy of Education, 4(1), 5–34. https://sid.ir/paper/264978/en  [Persian]
Thompson, E. (2001). Empathy and consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(5/7), 1–32. https://www.wisebrain.org/papers/EmpathyConsc.pdf
Thompson, E. (2007). Mind in Life: Biology, Phenomenology, and the Sciences of Mind. Harvard University Press.
Toffler, A. (1980). The Third Wave. Morrow.
Toffler, A., & Toffler, H. (1995). Creating a New Civilization: the Politics of the Third Wave. Turner.
UIS. (2016). The World Needs Almost 69 Million New Teachers to Reach The 2030 Education Goals (Issue 69). https://uis.unesco.org/en/files/fs39-world-needs-almost-69-million-new-teachers-reach-2030-education-goals-2016-en-pdf
UIS. (2017). More Than One-Half of Children and Adolescents Are Not Learning Worldwide (Issue 46). Microsoft Word - FS46-more-than-half-children-not-learning-en-2017-v20.docx
UNESCO. (2022a). 617 million children and adolescents not getting the minimum in reading and math. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/617-million-children-and-adolescents-not-getting-minimum-reading-and-math
UNESCO. (2022b). Stumbling blocks to universal primary education: Repetition rates decline but dropout rates remain high. https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/stumbling-blocks-universal-primary-education-repetition-rates-decline-dropout-rates-remain-high
Vanderstraeten, R. (2002). The autopoiesis of educational organizations: the impact of the organizational setting on educational interaction. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 19(3), 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.481
Varela, F. J. (1996). Neurophenomenology: a methodological remedy for the hard problem. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 3, 330– 350. https://unstable.nl/andreas/ai/langcog/part3/varela_npmrhp.pdf
Varela, F. J., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. The MIT Press.
Wolfmeyer, M., & Lupinacci, J. (2022). “Don’t Vax Up” The Real-Time Failure of Public STEM Education in the COVID-19 Era. Critical Education, 13(1), 108–121. https://doi.org/10.14288/ce.v13i1.186713
Zorn, D. (2011). Enactive education: Dynamic co- emergence, complexity, experience, and embodied mind [University of Toronto]. http://hdl.handle.net/1807/29918