نوع مقاله : علمی- پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی کارشناسی ارشد مدیریت آموشی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران

2 دانشیار گروه مدیریت آموزشی و توسعه منابع انسانی دانشکده علوم تربیتی و روان‌شناسی دانشگاه فردوسی مشهد، مشهد، ایران

چکیده

هدف اصلی این پژوهش توصیف الگوهای رهبری مدرسه در پیوند با متغیرهای زمینه­ای مدارس منطقه رضویه شهر مشهد به تفکیک مقطع تحصیلی مدارس (ابتدایی و متوسطه)، جنسیت مدیر مدرسه (مرد و زن)، بافت مدرسه (روستایی و شهری) تخصص و تجربه مدیران می‌باشد. برای دست‌یابی به این هدف، از روش توصیفی- پیمایشی استفاده شد. کلیه معلمان مدارس ابتدایی و متوسطه، دخترانه، پسرانه و مختلط در مناطق روستایی و شهری رضویه مشهد جامعه آماری موردمطالعه را تشکیل دادند که مشتمل بر 1148 نفر بودند. از این مجموع، 212 معلم به‌عنوان نمونه موردمطالعه انتخاب شدند. جهت گردآوری داده‌های موردنیاز از پرسشنامه استاندارد استفاده شد. نتایج حاصل از پژوهش نشان داد به‌طورکلی، از دیدگاه معلمان مدارس منطقه رضویه، الگوی رهبری مدیریتی با اختصاص بالاترین میانگین، الگوی رهبری غالب به شمار می‌رود؛ سپس الگوی رهبری اخلاقی، الگوی رهبری آموزشی، الگوی رهبری توزیعی و الگوی رهبری تحولی در مراتب بعدی قرار گرفتند. پیمایش الگوهای رهبری در مدارس موردمطالعه به تفکیک متغیرهای مختلف حاکی از غلبه الگوی رهبری مدیریتی در مدارس شهری و روستایی، به‌ویژه مدارس متوسطه، مدارس با مدیریت زن و مدارس با مدیران کم‌تجربه است و درعین‌حال، الگوی رهبری اخلاقی در مدارس با مدیریت مرد، مدارس ابتدایی و مدارس با مدیران باتجربه برجسته‌تر بود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Describing School Leadership Models in Relation to Contextual Variables (Case: Schools in Razaviyeh District of Mashhad)

نویسندگان [English]

  • Ghasem Aminikahrizsangi 1
  • Rezvan Hosseingalizadeh 2

1 Master's student of Educational Management, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Iran.

2 Associate Professor of the Department of Educational Management and Human Resource Development, Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Introduction
The main purpose of this study was to describe school leadership models in relation to contextual variables by school level (elementary and secondary), school principal gender (male and female), school context (rural and urban), principals' expertise and experience, based on Tony classification. Bush is in the schools of Razaviyeh region of Mashhad.
 
Method
To achieve the research goal, descriptive-survey method was used. All elemantary and secondary school teachers, girls, boys and mixed schools in rural and urban areas of Razaviyeh Mashhad, formed the statistical population of the study, which included 1148 people. From this total, 212 teachers were selected as the study sample, considering the criterion of having at least one year of experience working with the current principal. A standard questionnaire was used to collect the required data.
 
Results
The results of the research showed that, in general, from the perspective of school teachers in Razaviyeh region, the model of managerial leadership with the Secondaryest average is the dominant model of leadership; then the ethical leadership model, instructional leadership model, distributed leadership model and transformational leadership model were placed in the next ranks.
Discussion
Surveying the leadership models in the studied schools by different variables indicates the dominance of the leadership model in urban and rural schools, especially Secondary schools, schools with female management and schools with inexperienced principals. And schools were more prominent with experienced principals. The main findings of this study, as a result of comparison with existing research evidence in the field of management and instructional leadership, from the predominant tendency of school principals to the model of managerial leadership with regard to the requirements of centralized education system and ethical leadership influenced by the prevailing ideology and religious values. Managers as one of the underlying factors affecting their leadership model.
 

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Leadership models
  • Leadership of school principals
  • Managerial Leadership
  • Ethical Leadership
  • Schools in Razaviyeh region of Mashhad
Abdullah, J. B., & Kassim, J. (2012). Promoting learning environment among the Islamic school principals in the state of Pahang, Malaysia. Multicultural Education & Technology Journal. 6(2), 100-105.
Agasisti, T., Falzetti, P., & Soncin, M. (2020). School principals' managerial behaviours and students' achievement: An empirical analysis of Italian middle schools. International Journal of Educational Management. 34(5), 937-951.
Bani Issa Iman., & Al-Atari, Aref. (2019). Styles of behavior of leaders as recognized by faculty members working in universities in northern Jordan and their link to some variables. Al-Quds Open University Journal for Educational and Psychological Research and Studies, 10(27), 194-208.
Bayir, Ö. Ö., & Dönmez, A. (2020). Being a Woman School Principal in Turkey= Türkiye'de Kadin Okul Müdürü Olmak. Educational Administration: Theory & Practice, 26(1), 163-201.
Brown, M. E., & Treviño, L. K. (2006). Ethical leadership: A review and future directions. The Leadership Quarterly, 17(6), 595-616.
Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2014). School leadership models: What do we know?. School Leadership & Management, 34(5), 553-571.
Bush, T. (2008). Educational leadership and management: Theory, policy and practice. South African Journal of Education, 27(3), 391-406.
Chin, J. (2007). Meta-analysis of transformational leadership effects on school outcome in Taiwan and the USA. Asia Pacific Education Review, 8, 166-177.
Dehghani pour, F., Hosseingholizadeh, H., & Javidi Kalateh Jafarabadi, T. (2021). Identifying the conditions for the establishment of distributed leadership in the elemantary schools in Mashhad, Iran. Journal of School Adimistration, 9(2), 490-516. [Persian]
Erol, Y. C., & Turhan, M. (2018). The Relationship between Distributed Leadership and Family Involvement from Parents' Perspective. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 18(3), 525-540.
Farahani, M., Babadi, A., & Khorshidi, A. (2020). Identifying the Educational Leadership Pattern of School Administrators (Case study: The First Elemantary School in Tehran). Journal of Management and Planning in Educational Systems. 13(2), 265-298. [Persian]
Fransco, K. (2018). Educational leadership is different in the country; What support does the rural school principal need? International Journal of Leadership in Education. 22(3), 301-315.
Gedik, S., & Bellibas, M. S. (2015). Examining Schools' Distributed Instructional Leadership Capacity: Comparison of Elementary and Secondary Schools. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 3(6), 101-110.
Hallinger, P., & Murphy, J. F. (2013). Running on empty? Finding the time and capacity to lead learning. NASSP Bulletin, 97(1), 5-21.
Hallinger, P., Hosseingholizadeh, R., Hashemi, N., & Kouhsari, M. (2017). Do beliefs make a difference? Exploring how principal self-efficacy and instructional leadership impact teacher efficacy and commitment in Iran. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 46(5), 800-819.
Hallinger, P., & Hosseingholizadeh, R. (2020). Exploring instructional leadership in Iran: A mixed methods study of high-and low-performing principals. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(4), 595-616.
Hanifi, F., & Karamali, A. (2014). Investigating the performance of final Secondary school principals in Tehran based on the authors Empowering managers. Journal of Educational Management Research, 4(3), 220-234. [Persian]
Hui, L. S., & Singh, G. S. B. (2020). The Influence of Instructional Leadership on Learning Organisation at Secondary Performing Elemantary Schools in Malaysia. Asian Journal of University Education, 16(2), 69-76.‏
Jamali, J. (2019). Comparison of management style of graduates of educational management with graduates of other fields in schools of West Azerbaijan. National Conference on Educational Psychology. [Persian]
Jambo, D., & Hongde, L. (2020). The Effect of Principal's Distributed Leadership Practice on Students' Academic Achievement: A Systematic Review of the Literature. International Journal of Higher Education, 9(1), 189-198.
Lahtero, T. J., Ahtiainen, R. S., & Niina, L. Ã. (2019). Finnish principals: Leadership training and views on distributed leadership. Educational Research and Reviews, 14(10), 340-348.
Lawrence, A. S. (2015). Leadership Style of High School Teachers. Online Submission, 4(5), 225-227.
Leithwood, K., & Seashore-Louis, K. (2011). Linking leadership to student learning. John Wiley & Sons.
Langlois, L., Lapointe, C., Valois, P., & de Leeuw, A. (2014). Development and validity of the ethical leadership questionnaire. Journal of Educational Administration. 52(3), 310-331.
Mentese, S. (2021). School Principals' Levels of Administrative Competences Based on the Perceptions of Principals and Teachers. European Educational Researcher, 4(1), 4362.
Murphy, J. (Ed.). (2005). Connecting teacher leadership and school improvement. Corwin Press.
Nurdianti, L., & Nurdin, D. (2020, February). Instructional leadership in improving the quality of elementary school education in Bandung. In 3rd International Conference on Research of Educational Administration and Management, 348-351.
Oorschot, J., Moscardo, G., & Blackman, A. (2021). Leadership style and psychological contract. Australian Journal of Career Development, 30(1), 43-54.
Preston, J. P., & Barnes, K. E. (2017). Successful leadership in rural schools: cultivating collaboration. The Rural Educator, 38(1), 6-15.
Procek, C. (2012). Leading for change: how leadership style impacts teachers' experience. Northeastern University.
Schulze, R. & Boscardin, M. (2018). Leadership Perceptions of Principals with and without Special Education Backgrounds. Mary Lynn Journal of School Leadership, 28(1), 4-30.
Şenol, H. (Ed.). (2020). Educational Leadership. BoD–Books on Demand.
Studer, J. R. (2007). Erik Erikson’s psychological stages applied to supervision. Journal of Guidance and Counseling, 21(3), 168-173.
Suratman, S. (2021). Instructional Leadership Style at MAN 1 Samarinda. Dinamika Ilmu: Jurnal Pendidikan, 21(1), 165-176.
Talebizadeh, S. M., Hosseingholizadeh, R., & Bellibaş, M. Ş. (2021). Analyzing the relationship between principals’ learning-centered leadership and teacher professional learning: The mediation role of trust and knowledge sharing behavior. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 68, 100970. [Persian]
Tobin, J. (2014). Management and Leadership Issues for School Building Leaders. NCPEA Inernational Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 99(1), 1-14.
Vallejo, C. (2018). Examining the Relationship between Principal Leadership Style and Teacher Job Satisfaction in South Texas. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, PO Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106.
Wickham, D. M. (2007). Female superintendents: perceived barriers and successful strategies used to attain the superintendency in California. (Unpublished doctoral thesis). University of the Pacific, California.
Zare, S., Hosseingholizadeh, R., & Mahram, B. (2018). Identifying the dominant educational leadership model and describing its features in the Secondary schools in Birjand. Journal of Management and Planning in Educational Systems, 12 (1), 339-368. [persian]