نوع مقاله : علمی- پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دکتری تخصصی تکنولوژی آموزشی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران.

2 استادیار، گروه تعلیم و تربیت، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران

3 استاد، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران

4 دانشیار، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده علوم انسانی، دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران

5 دکتری تخصصی مدیریت آموزشی، آموزش و پرورش ناحیه 4، اهواز، ایران

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر به‌منظور بررسی کیفیت مهارت نوشتن دانش‌آموزان ابتدایی انجام گرفت. جامعه آماری در این پژوهش ارزیابانه، دانش‌آموزان پسر دوره‌ی دوم دبستان شهر تهران در سال تحصیلی 1400-1399، و نمونه مورد مطالعه، شامل سه کلاس (دو کلاس 35 نفری+یک کلاس 27 نفری) و در کل برابر با 97 نفر بودند که بر اساس نمونه‌گیری در دسترس انتخاب شدند. ابزار مورد استفاده این پژوهش، روبریک درس نگارش بود. به‌منظور تجزیه‌‌و‌تحلیل اطلاعات از شاخص‌های مرکزی و شاخص‌های پراکندگی استفاده شد. طرح پژوهش از نوع بررسی‌های ارزیابانه بود. پس از اخذ نمونه نگارش‌های دانش‌آموزان نسبت به نمره‌گذاری آنها بر اساس روبریک محقق‌‌ساخته ویژه‌ی نگارش دوره‌ی دوم دبستان اقدام شد. نتایج تحلیل‌آماری نشان داد که میانگین نمره نگارش دانش‌آموزان دبستانی، پایین‌تر از تسلط نسبی و در حد تسلط محدود و نسبتاً ضعیف قرار دارد (65/12M=). می‌توان نتیجه گرفت که مهارت نگارش دانش‌آموزان همچون مهارت خوانداری آنان ضعیف می‌باشد و شاید این ضعف ریشه در ضعف خوانداری آنان و/ یا طراحی نامناسب برنامه درسی و کم‌توجهی به رویکردهای دیگر از قبیل رویکرد فرهنگی-اجتماعی دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

An investigation on the writing quality of elementary school students: an evaluating study

نویسندگان [English]

  • heshmat nazari 1
  • Ebrahim Talaee 2
  • Javad Hatami 3
  • mihsen imani 4
  • Abdolzahra Timas 5

1 Ph. D in instructional technology, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.

3 Professor, Tarbiat Modares University, Thran, Iran.

4 Asociate Professor, Tarbiat Modares University, Thran, Iran.

5 Ph. D in Educational Management, School District 4, Ahvaz, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Introduction
The present study was aimed to evaluate the quality of writing in elementary school students. The statistical population in the study was male students of the upper elementary school in Tehran in the academic year 2020 to 2021, that among them 107 samples including three classes (2 classes of 35 students + 1 class of 27 students) were selected based on convenient sampling technique. To collect data a researcher-maker writing rubric was used and data central and dispersion indices were applied to analyze.
 
Method
The research design belonged to evaluative (evaluation) researche or programme. In this type of research, reearcger want to evaluate a product or concept and collect data that helps improve his/her solution.
 
Results
The results showed that the average writing score of upper elementary students, including 4th, 5th, and 6th grade, is lower than relative mastery and is limited and somewhat weak (M = 12.65).
Discussion
It can be concluded that students' writing is as weak as their reading and perhaps the imperfection is rooted in their reading weakness. As a suggestion, it would be better to teach writing, apart from the psychological approach toward teaching, using other approaches and paradigms such as cultural-social approach and the following theories as for example activity theory. Also, it is sugesssted that the learning environment design based on such approaches.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • writing
  • writing rubric
  • elementary school
  • evaluating research
Abasi, Z., Daneshgar, M., & Khosravi, A. (2018). Analysis of reading problems of high school graduates in Tehran based on AMZA test data (according to the variables of gender and field of study). Language Related Research, 10(6), 173-204. [Persian]
Ahmadi, S. A., & Amin-moghadasi, S. (2001). The effect of social skills training on composition in 3rd grade elementary students. Quarterly Journal of Education, 66, 95-106. [Persian]
Alghammas, A. (2020). The weaknesses of English writing skills among undergraduate Saudi students majoring in English at Qassim University: A perspective of English faculty. Available at SSRN 3621267.
Andrade, H. L., Du, Y., & Wang, X. (2008). Putting rubrics to the test: The effect of a model, criteria generation, and rubric‐referenced self‐assessment on elementary school students' writing. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 27(2), 3-13.
Andrade, H. L., Wang, X., Du, Y., & Akawi, R. L. (2009). Rubric-referenced self-assessment and self-efficacy for writing. The Journal of Educational Research, 102(4), 287-302.
Burgin, J., & Hughes, G. D. (2009). Credibly assessing reading and writing abilities for both elementary student and program assessment. Assessing Writing, 14(1), 25-37.
Casey, L. B., Miller, N. D., Stockton, M. B., & Justice, W. V. (2016). Assessing writing in elementary schools: Moving away from a focus on mechanics. Language Assessment Quarterly, 13(1), 42-54.
Daneshghar, M., Qayasi Zarej, A., Ashraghi, Z., Haeri, A. A., Mohamadi, S. (2017). Assessing the ability to "write" in graduates of the high school student. Literary Research, 14(55), 37-60. [Persian]
Faramarzi, S., Karamalian, H., & Nasrollahi, S. (2011).  The effect of educational intervention based on language experience approach on students' written expression skills (essay). New Educational Approaches, 6 (2), 41-60. [Persian]
Farid, A., & Ashrafzade, T. (2020). A Meta-Analysis of the Relationship Self-Efficacy and Academic Performance. Journal of Educational Sciences (JEDUS), 27(2), 69-90. [Persian]
Ghorbankhan, M., Salehi, K., Moghaddam Zadeh, A. (2020) Construction of a Standardized Questionnaire to Detect the Pseudo Evaluation in Elementary Schools. Journal of Educational Sciences (JEDUS), 27(2), 91-116. [Persian]
Khazaie, S., & Mashhadi, A. (2021). From Secondary Education to the Healthcare Fields: Exploring the Feasibility of English Content-based Instruction of Reading Sciences along with Games for Lifelong Learning. Journal of Educational Sciences (JEDUS), 28(1), 23-42. [Persian]
Maleki H. (2000). The program curriculum. Mashhad: publishing payame andisheh. [Persian]
Pace, G. (1995). Whole Learning in the Middle School: Evolution and Transtion. Norwood, MA: Christopher - Gordon Publishers, Inc
Palincsar, A. S. (1998). Social constructivist perspectives on teaching and learning. Annual Review of Psychology, 49(1), 345-375.
Palmer, S. (2010). How to teach writing across the curriculum: Ages 8-14. Routledge.
Pitan, O. S. (2017). Graduate employees’ generic skills and training needs. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning.
Popp, S. E. O., Ryan, J. M., Thompson, M. S., & Behrens, J. T. (2003). Operationalizing the Rubric: The Effect of Benchmark Selection on the Assessed Quality of Writing. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association (Chicago, IL, April 21-25, 2003).
Research organization and educational planning. (2017). 3rd grade Persian writing book. Administration of Supervision on publication and distribution of educational materials. [Persian]
Salsebili, N. (2010). Evaluation of the designed, compiled and implemented Persian curriculum in elementary school (reading and writing) based on attention to holistic criterion in teaching languistic skills. Quarterly Journal of Educational Innovation, 33(9), 8-46. [Persian]
Salsebili, N. (2019). Evaluation of the implemented Persian curriculum in the 1st grade elementary school. Quarterly Journal of Curriculum Studies, 14(55), 141-176. [Persian]
Salsebili, N. (2020). Study of the Results of Evaluation Acquired Persian Curriculum in the Elementary School: Strengths and Weaknesses of Students in Acquiring Linguistic Learning Skills. Quarterly Journal of Educational Innovation, 74(19), 105-134. [Persian]
Sawaki, Y., Quinlan, T., & Lee, Y. W. (2013). Understanding learner strengths and weaknesses: Assessing performance on an integrated writing task. Language Assessment Quarterly, 10(1), 73-95.
Taremi, T., & Rafiee, A. (2013). Comparison of the degree of adaptation in written and spoken form in Persian and English. Iranian Journal of Comparative Linguistic Research, 3(5), 23-29. [Persian]
Teale, W. H. (1988). Developmentally appropriate assessment of reading and writing in the early childhood classroom. The Elementary School Journal, 89(2), 173-183.
Vacc, N. N. (1989). Writing evaluation: Examining four teachers' holistic and analytic scores. The Elementary School Journal, 90(1), 87-95.
Wild, M. D., Mayeaux, A. S., & Edmonds, K. P. (2008). Teamwork: Setting the Standard for Collaborative Teaching, Grades 5-9. Stenhouse Publishers.