نوع مقاله : علمی- پژوهشی

نویسندگان

استادیار، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران

چکیده

این پژوهش در راستای بررسی رضایت دانشجویان در رویکرد یادگیری وارونه از منظر انعطاف پداگوژیکی آن از لحاظ رسانه، روش تدریس آنلاین-آفلاین و ارزشیابی در آموزش الکترونیکی صورت گرفت. روش انجام پژوهش از نوع آمیخته با طرح همسوسازی داده‌های کمی و کیفی بود که در بخش کمی با روش پیمایشی و در بخش کیفی با مطالعه‌ی موردی انجام شد. جامعه‌ی آماری در پیمایش شامل 30 دانشجوی علوم تربیتی دانشگاه بوعلی‌سینا در سال تحصیلی 1399 بود که حجم نمونه برابر با جامعه و در مطالعه‌ی موردی شامل 15 مشارکت کننده‌ بود که با این رویکرد آموزش دیده بودند. از راهبرد مصاحبه نیمه‌ساختارمند و پرسشنامه محقق‌ساخته برای جمع‌آوری داده‌ها استفاده گردید که روایی آن از نظر متخصصان و پایایی آن از طریق آلفای کرونباخ (89/0) تایید شد. یافته‌های حاصل از پژوهش بیانگر رضایت دانشجویان از لحاظ انعطاف ادغام رسانه با محتوا، انعطاف رویکرد یادگیری وارونه در تدریس‌های آفلاین و آنلاین و همچنین شیوه‌ی ارزشیابی در آموزش الکترونیکی بود. بر مبنای نتایج حاصل از یافته‌های این پژوهش، می‌توان گفت رویکرد یادگیری وارونه به دلیل انعطاف پذیری آن از منظر ادغام رسانه با محتوا، روش تدریس، و ارزشیابی موجب رضایت یادگیرندگان از آموزش‌های از راه دور می‌شود و با تلفیق ابعاد مختلف پداگوژی در رویکرد یادگیری وارونه می‌توان رضایت دانشجویان از آموزش‌های راه دور را افزایش داد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The study of Students Satisfaction with a Flipped Learning Approach (FTA) During COVID-19 from Pedagogical flexibility (Media, Method & Evaluation)

نویسندگان [English]

  • maryam pourjamshidi
  • hossin Zangeneh

Assistant Professor, University of Bu Ali Sina, Hamadan, Iran.

چکیده [English]

One of the areas particularly influenced by Coronavirus is educational systems that operate differently in different societies. some Iranian universities have been providing E-learning for about a decade and half, not for the whole system of education, but at high education and school level. This difference is especially significant in the Coronavirus period from several perspectives: first) acceptance is forced and not voluntary, second) lack of ready-made educational packages in terms of content, third) low readiness of teachers and professors in terms of method of teaching and evaluation strategies in distance education, fourth) low familiarity of learners with the necessary skills for distance education and acceptance of the main responsibility of the learning processes in the educational system, fifth) poor communication platforms and reduced online interactions, especially in rural areas, sixth) inappropriately providing and supporting services by universities and schools. One of the approaches for instructors to solve them and be effective in distance learning is the FTA. Therefore, by considering the importance of the learners' performance and satisfaction as an internal factor that affects motivation, and plays an important mediating role in the learning process, and also the lack of research on the pedagogy used in the flipped teaching, the study was done on e-learning Corona period and aims to study students' satisfaction with the FTA in terms of pedagogical flexibility.

Method
The research method was mixed with the explanatory plan being done in the quantitative part by the survey, and in the qualitative part by the case study. The statistical population in the survey included 30 students of educational sciences of Bu Ali Sina University in the academic year 2020, the sample size was equal to the population and the case study included 15 interested participants who were taught with this approach. A semi-structured interview strategy and researcher-made questionnaire were used to collect data, the validity of which was confirmed by experts, and its reliability was confirmed by Cronbach's alpha.

Results
The study's findings showed students' satisfaction in terms of flexibility of integrating media with content, the flexibility of FTA offline and online, and evaluation strategies.

Discussion
Based on the results of the findings of the study, the FTA due to its flexibility in terms of media integration with content, teaching methods, and evaluation leads to students' satisfaction with distance learning and combining different dimensions of pedagogy. In the FTA, students' satisfaction with distance learning can be increased.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Flipped Teaching
  • Pedagogical Flexibility
  • Media matching With Content
  • Online-Offline Teaching
  • Evaluation Strategies
Abbasi, S., Ayoob, T., Malik, A., Memon, SI. (2020). Perceptions of students regarding Elearning during Covid-19 at a private medical college. Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences, 36, S4-19. [Persian]
Alqahtani, AY., Rajkhan, AA. (2020). E-learning critical success factors during the covid19 pandemic: A comprehensive analysis of e-learning managerial perspectives. Education Sciences, 10(9), 216.
Bergmann, J., Sams, A. (2012). Flipping the classroom. Teach & Learning, 32(10), 42–43.
Chen Hsieh, JS., Wu, W.C.V., & Marek, MW. (2017). Using the flipped classroom to enhance EFL learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 30, 1-2, 1-21, DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2015.1111910
Garrison, DR., & Baynton, M. (1987). Beyond independence in distance education: The concept of control. The American Journal of Distance Education. 1(3), 3-15.
Farsi, Z., Aliyari, S., Ahmadi, Y., Afaghi, E., & Azam, S. (2021). Satisfaction of the Quality of Education and Virtual Education during the Covid -19 Pandemic in Nursing Students of Aja University of Medical Sciences in 2020. Journal of Military Medicine, 23(2), 174 -185. [Persian]
Han, J., Huh, S. Y., Cho, Y. H., Park, S-H., Choi, J., Suh, B., & Rhee, W. (2020). Utilizing online learning data to design face to face activities in a flipped classroom: a case study of heterogeneous group formation. Educational Technology Research and Development. 68(5), 2055-2071.
Holmberg, B. (1995). The sphere of distance-education theory revisited. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED386578).
Hwang, G-J., Yin, Ch., & Chu, H-C. (2019). The era of flipped learning: promoting active learning and higher order thinking with innovative flipped learning strategies and supporting systems. Interactive Learning Environment. 27(8), 991-994.
Khanifar, K., Shahhosseini, S., & Bageri, M. (2021). Comparison of the Effect of Flipped Learning through Video Images and Multimedia Methods on Learning in the Mathematical Science Course of Sixth Grade. Journal of Educational Sciences (JEDUS). 28(2), 79-96. [Persian]
Kaviani, H., Liaghatdar, M.G., Zamani, BB., & Abediny, Y. (2018). The Learning Process in the Flipped Classroom: A Representation of Experienced Curriculum in Higher Education. Journal of Higher Education Curriculum Studies, 8(15), 179 -214. [Persian]
Keegan, D. (1996). The foundations of distance education (3rd ed.). London, England: Croom Helm.
Khazaie, S., & Mashhadi, A. (2021). From Secondary Education to the Healthcare Fields: Exploring the Feasibility of English Content-based Instruction of Reading Sciences along with Games for Lifelong Learning. Journal of Educational Sciences (JEDUS), 28(1), 23-42. [Persian]
Khoshnoodifar M., Mohajerpour R., Rahimi E., Roshani D., & Zarezadeh Y. (2019). Comparison between the effects of flipped class and traditional methods of instruction on satisfaction, active participation, and learning level in a continuous medical education course for general practitioners. Journal of Kurdistan University of Medical Sciences. 24(1), 56-65. [Persian]
Lee, M-K. (2018). Flipped classroom as an alternative future class model? implications of South Korea’s social experiment. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(3), doi: 10.1007/s11423-018-9587-9.
Moore, M. (1972) 'Learner autonomy: the second dimension of independent learning', Convergence. 5(2), 76-88.
Mohamadichemardani, H., & Rahmani, M. (2019). Identifying Effective Factors in Success of E-Learning Courses. Journal of Educational Sciences. 26(1), 137-154. [Persian]
Murillo-Zamorano, l. R., López Sánchez, J. A., & Godoy-Caballero, A. L. (2019). How the flipped classroom affects knowledge, skills, and engagement in higher education: Effects on students' satisfaction, Computers & Education, 141, 103608.
O’Flaherty, J., & Phillips, C. (2015). The use of flipped classrooms in higher education: A scoping review. The Internet and Higher Education, 25, 85–95.
Peters, O. (1988). Distance teaching and industrial production: A comparative interpretation in outline. In D. Sewart, D. Keegan, & B. Holmberg (Eds.), Distance education: International perspectives (95–113). New York, NY: Routledge.
Pierce, R., & Fox, J. (2012). Vodcasts and Active-Learning Exercises in a Flipped Classroom Model of a Renal Pharmacotherapy Module. Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 76, 196.
Ramos-Morcillo AJ, Leal-Costa C, Moral-García JE, Ruzafa-Martínez M. (2020). Experiences of nursing students during the abrupt change from face-to-face to e-learning education during the first month of confinement due to COVID19 in Spain. International journal of environmental research and public health. 2020; 17(15), 5519.
Şenel Tekin, P., Ilgaz, H., Afacan Adanır, G., Yıldırım, D., & Gülbahar, Y. (2020). Flipping elearning for teaching medical terminology: A study of learners’ online experiences and perceptions. Online Learning, 24(2), 76-93.
Sharma, N., Bhusal, CK., Subedi, S., Kasarla, R. R. (2021). Perception towards Online Classes during COVID-19 among MBBS and BDS Students in a Medical College of Nepal: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study. JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc. Mar 31; 59(235): 276-279. doi: 10.31729/jnma.5348. PMID: 34506447; PMCID: PMC8369542.
Wedemeyer, C. (1981). Learning at the backdoor. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
Yilmaz, R. M., Baydas, O. (2017). An examination of undergraduates’ metacognitive strategies in pre-class asynchronous activity in a flipped classroom. Educational Technology Research and Development. 65, 1547–1567.