علوم تربیتی

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

اخبار و اعلانات

طراحی الگوی مفهومی دانشگاه نسل سوم در نظام آموزش عالی از دور؛ مورد مطالعه دانشگاه پیام نور

نوع مقاله : علمی- پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجوی دکتری برنامه ریزی آموزش از دور، دانشگاه پیام نور، صندوق پستی: 3697-19395، تهران، ایران.

2 دانشیار، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه پیام نور، صندوق پستی: 3697-19395، تهران، ایران.

3 استادیار، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه پیام نور، صندوق پستی: 3697-19395، تهران، ایران.

4 استادیار، گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه پیام نور، صندوق پستی: 3697-19395، تهران، ایران

چکیده

پژوهش حاضر با هدف طراحی الگوی مفهومی دانشگاه نسل سوم در نظام آموزش عالی از دور با مورد مطالعه قرار دادن دانشگاه پیام نور به عنوان بستر مطالعاتی انجام گردید. روش پژوهش کیفی و برمبنای نظریه داده بنیاد انتخاب گردید. جامعه مشارکت کنندگان در پژوهش کلیه اعضای هیات علمی دانشگاه پیام نور بود. در این پژوهش از روش نمونه گیری هدفمند استفاده گردید به طوری از بین اعضای هیات علمی دانشگاه تعداد 46 نفر به عنوان نمونه انتخاب شدند و با ابزار مصاحبه نیمه ساختار یافته مورد آزمون قرار گرفتند. داده های حاصل با رویکرد سه مرحله ای در نظریه داده بنیاد (کدگذاری باز؛ کدگذاری محوری و کدگذاری انتخابی) کدگذاری و تحلیل گردید. اجرای فرآیند کدگذاری باز منجر به شناسایی 114 مفهوم گردید. در مرحله کدگذاری محوری مفاهیم در قالب 23 مقوله ی فرعی و 8 مقوله اصلی جای گرفت. سپس مدل پارادایمی با ارکان شرایط علی( فضای سازمانی حاکم بر دانشگاه)، شرایط زمینه ای(زیرساخت های سازمانی)، شرایط مداخله گر(خودمختاری، جهانی شدن و تعاملات اثربخش)، پدیده محوری( دانشگاه نسل سوم)، راهبرد ها( بازنگری کنش های اداری و اجرایی) و پیامدها(جامعه توسعه محور)ترسیم گردید و در نهایت با اجرای فرآیند کدگذاری گزینشی، الگوی مفهومی پژوهش روابط بین عوامل را تبیین نمود. الگوی بدست آمده مشخص می کند که برای نسل سومی شدن باید در حوزه سخت افزاری و نرم افزاری تغییراتی در دانشگاه انجام پذیرد که در صورت ایجاد این تغییرات دانشگاه می تواند علاوه بر استقلال خود در توسعه ی جامعه نیز نقش مهمی را ایفا کند.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

Designing a Conceptual Model of the Third Generation University in System of distance education; The Case of Payame Noor University

نویسندگان [English]

  • Mohammad Moshki Hassan Abad 1
  • Mahmoud Ekrami 2
  • Ahmad Karimi Dashtaki 3
  • hossein hafezi 4

1 PhD Student in distance education planning, Payame Noor University, PostBox: 19395-3697, Tehran, Iran.

2 Associate Professor, Educational Sciences, Payame Noor University, PostBox: 19395-3697, Tehran, Iran.

3 Assistant Professor, Educational Sciences, Payame Noor University, PostBox: 19395-3697, Tehran, Iran.

4 Assistant Professor, Educational Sciences, Payame Noor University, PostBox: 19395-3697, Tehran, Iran

چکیده [English]

Introduction
Universities have experienced different generations in during their lives. The first generation of universities had a purely educational function. The second generation of universities also had a research function. In the third generation, the application of research was considered. The third generation of universities is called the: Entrepreneur University. Third generation universities must be able to be independent and Prepare your graduates to enter in the job market. The purpose of this study is to design a conceptual model for third generation universities in the distance education system.

Method
The method used in this research is Grounded theory. By using a purposeful sampling method, 46 faculty members of Payame Noor University were select. Data were collected using semi-structured interviews. Then the data were coded by the three-step method in Grounded theory.

Results
Execution of the open coding step identified 114 concepts. In axial coding stage, concepts were summarized into 23 sub-categories and 8 main categories. Then a paradigm model was drawn with causal conditions (organizational space of university), contextual conditions (organizational infrastructure), intervening conditions (autonomy, globalization and effective interactions), central phenomenon (third generation university), strategies (administrative and executive review) and outcome (development-oriented society). Finally, conceptual model of the third generation university was created.

Discussion
Based on the conceptual model obtained, the university should be reviewed. This review should be done in the field of university hardware and software. Therefore, changes in strategies, perspectives, facilities and equipment are necessary for the third generation. In this case, the university can be a factor in the comprehensive development of society. To achieve this, the university must support from the new ideas and creativity of its staff. Also, creative beliefs in the workplace should replace routine beliefs. In the field of hardware, the necessary equipment to develop the talents of employees should be provided to them. In addition, the university must have a good relationship with other universities and other sections of society. To become a third-generation university, administrative approaches must become more flexible and educational policies must change. The new needs for educational and research should be known and based on those needs, educational and research goals should be set. By making these changes, the university will be on the path of economic and social development which creates innovative products and creative services. Finally, the establishment of this type of university leads to sustainable development in society.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Conceptual model
  • Third Generation University
  • system of high and distance education
  • Grounded Theory
مراجع
Audretsch, D. B., Bonte, W., & Keilbach, M. (2008), “Entrepreneurship capital its impact on knowledge diffusion and economic performance”, Journal of Business Venturing. 23(1), 687-698.
Audretsch, D. B. (2012). "From the Entrepreneurial University to the University for the Entrepreneurial Society". The Journal of Technology Transfer. 39, 313-321.
Bahrami, S., Zabardast, M., & Salimi, J. (2020). Qualitative Analysis of University Professors' Experiences of Professional Identity, Journal of Educational Sciences, 27 (1), 203-220. [Persian]
Blenker, P., Dreisler, P., Fargemann, H., & Kjeldsen, J. (2004), Entrepren-eurship Educational University. Context, Aarhus School of Business, Denmark. Availableat: https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/311457373Entrepreneurship education and university context.
Bolling, M., & Eriksson, Y. (2016). Collaboration with society: The future role of universities? Identifying challenges for evaluation. Research Evaluation, 25(2), 209–218.
Clark, B. R. (1998). The entrepreneurial university, demand and response ternary education and management.
Closs, L., Ferrira, G. C., Soria, A. F., Sampaio, G. H., & Perin, M. (2012). Organizational Factors that Affect the University– Industry Technology Transfer Processes a Private University. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation. 7(1), 104–117.
Creswell, J. W. (2014). Educational Research Planning: Conduction & Evaluating. Qualitative, Quantitative Research. (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, Nj. Pearson Education, Inc.
Etzkowitz, H. (2003). “Innovation in Innovation: The Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations”, Social Science Information, 42(3), 293-337.
Etzkowitz, H., & Zhou, C. (2006), “Triple Helix twins: innovation and sustainability”, Science and Public Policy, 33(1), February 2006, 77–83.Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). “The dynamics of Innovation: From the national systems and “mode2” to a Triple Helix of university-industry government relation”, Research policy, 20(2), 109-23.Faridi, M. R. (2017). Presentation a model for measuring the readiness of higher education institutions to become a third generation university (Innovative and entrepreneurial). Case Study: Shahed University. For PhD Thesis. Urmia University. [Persian]Gibb, A., Haskins, G., & Robertson, I. (2009). “Leading the entrepreneurial university: Meeting the entrepreneurial development needs of higher education institutions”, Said Business School, University of Oxford, October, 1-44.
Guerrero, M., Kirby, D. A., & Urbano, D. (2006). “A literature review on entrepreneurial university: an institutional approach”, 3rd Conference of Pre communications to Congresses, Business Economic Department. Autonomous University of Barcelona. Barcelona, June 2006.
Gurol, y., & Astan, N. (2006). Entrepreneurships characteristics amongst university students. Education Training, 43(1), 25-38.
Haj Khozeymeh, M., Abili, KH., & Pour Karimi, J. (2020). Presenting a Model for Professional Development Departments’ Heads in Universities and Institutes of Higher Education Based on a Lean Approach, Journal of Educational Sciences, 27(1), 221-240. [Persian]
Hannon, D. Paul. (2013). Why is the Entrepreneurial University Important? Journal of Innovation Management. 1(2), 10-17.
Jacob, M., Lundqvist, M., & Hellsmark, H. (2003). “Entrepreneurial transformations in the Swedish University system: the case of Chalmers University of Technology”, Research Policy, 32(9), 1555-1569.
Kakouris, A., Liargovas, P., & Sousa, C. (2018). Editorial: The entrepreneurial university across regions. Innovation and Regional Development, 8(4), 280-285.
Kawamorita, H., Salamzadeh, A., Demiryurek, K., & Ghajarzadeh, M. (2020). Entrepreneurial Universities in Times of Crisis: Case of Covid-19 Pandemic, Journal of Entrepreneurship, Business and Economics, 8(1), 77–88.
Kirby, D. A. (2006). “Creating entrepreneurial universities in the UK: Applying entrepreneurship theory to practice”, Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(5), 599–603.
Lombardi, R., Massaro, M., Dumay, J., & Nappo, F. (2019). "Entrepreneurial universities and strategy: the case of the University of Bari", Management Decision, 57(12), 3387-3405.
Meigounpoory, M., Arabiun, A., Poorbasir, M., & Mobini Dehkordi, A. (2019). Entrepreneurial university campus ecosystem (EUCE) design with interpretive structural modelling: A new approach in higher education system. Journal of Technology of Education, 14(1), 251-261.
Mirzaei Rayeni, Z. (2017). Explain the characteristics of the third generation university and the extent to which Shahid Bahonar University has achieved it. For Master Thesis. Shahid Bahonar University in Kerman. [Persian]Moghadasi, A. (2015). Prioritization of factors affecting the creation of a skill-oriented university. For Master Thesis. Elmo Farhang University. [Persian]Mohseni Tabrizi, A. (2016). Research methods in interpretive schools. Tehran; Etelaat Pub. [Persian]Nazarzadeh Zare, M. (2018). Identification of Obstacles of the Faculty Members’ International Interactions: A Qualitative Approach, Journal of Educational Sciences, 25(2), 179-196. [Persian]
Nelles, J., & Vorley, T. (2010). “Constructing an Entrepreneurial Architecture: An Emergent Framework for Studying the Contemporary University Beyond the Entrepreneurial Turn”, Innovative Higher Education, 35(3), 161-176.
Oshea, R. P., & Allen, T. J. (2005). Creating the entrepreneurial university, the case of MIT, presented at the academic of management conference Hawaii.
Philpott, K., Dooley, L., O’Reilly, C., & Lupton, G. (2011). “The entrepreneurial university: Examining the underlying academic tensions”, Tech Novation, 31, 161-170.
Rahimiyan, H., Abbas Pour, A., Taheri, M., & Sobhani Pour, S. (2018). Designing and validating a servant leadership model for Farhangiyan University by Grounded theory, Journal of Educational Sciences, 25(1), 78-108. [Persian]
Salamzadeh, A., Salamzadeh, Y., & Daraei, M., (2011). “Toward a Systematic Framework for an Entrepreneurial University: A Study in Iranian Context with an IPOO Model”, Global Business and Management Research, 3(1), 30-37.
Salun, M., Zaslavska, K., & Zmicerevska, D. (2019). Entrepreneurial universities: literature review. Economics of Development, 18(3), 12-18.
Silverman, D. (2005). Instances or sequences? Improving the state of the art of qualitative research. In Forum Qualitative Sozial forschung/ Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 6(3), 25-39.
Sohn, S. Y., & Moon, T. H. (2003). Structural equation model for Predicting technology comer cialization success index. (TCSI) Technology Forecasting & Social Change, 70, 885- 899.
Sporn, B., (2001). “Building Adaptive Universities: Emerging Organizational Forms Based on Experiences of European and US Universities”, Tertiary Education and Management, 7(2), 121-134.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2013). Basics of Qualitative Research. Translated by Ebrahim Afshar. Tehran. Ney Pub. [Persian]
Subotzky, G., (1999). “Alternatives to the Entrepreneurial University: New Modes of Knowledge Production in Community Service Programs”, Higher Education, 38(4), 401-440.
Taghipoor Zahir, A., & Hasanmoradi, N. (2006). Suitable model for creating an entrepreneurial university. Journal of Economy & Management, 69, 31-40. [Persian]Yadollahi Farsi, J., et al. (2009). Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship. Encyclopaedia Foundation of Iran: Ministry of Science. [Persian]Zabihi, M. R., & Moghadasi, A. (2006). Entrepreneurship from theory to Experience. Mashhad. Jahan farda Pub. [Persian]
علوم تربیتی
دوره 28، شماره 1
تیر 1400
صفحه 165-184
فایل ها
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار