جارویس، پیتر (1995). آموزش بزرگسالان و آموزش مداوم. ترجمه غلامعلی سرمد (1378). تهران: انتشارات سمت.
راسل، برتراند. در تربیت. ترجمه عباس شوقی (1349). تهران: چاپ اتحاد.
رمی زفسکی، ای. جی. (1987). طراحی نظامهای آموزشی تصمیم‌گیری در برنامه‌ریزی درسی و طراحی برنامه درسی. ترجمه هاشم فردانش (1379). تهران: انتشارات سمت.
سیف، علی‌اکبر (1368). روانشناسی پرورشی. تهران: انتشارات آگاه.
سیلور، جی گالن. الکساندر، ویلیام ام و لوئیس، آرتور جی. برنامه‌ریزی درسی برای تدریس و یادگیری بهتر. ترجمه غلامرضا خوی‌نژاد (1377). مشهد: انتشارات آستان قدس رضوی.
فتحی‌آذر، اسکندر (1372). تدریس و یادگیری از دیدگاه شناخت‌گرایی. فصلنامه تعلیم و تربیت، شماره 33، بهار.
فولن، مایکل. اجرای برنامه درسی. ترجمه غلامرضا خوی‌نژاد. برنامه‌ریزی درسی: نظرگاهها، رویکردها و چشم‌اندازها، محمود مهرمحمدی (1381). مشهد: انتشارات آستان قدس رضوی.
کلاین، فرانسیس. استفاده از یک مدل تحقیقاتی به عنوان راهنمای فرایند برنامه‌ریزی درسی. ترجمه محمود مهرمحمدی (1369). فصلنامه تعلیم و تربیت، شماره 22 و 23، تابستان و پاییز.
گوتک، جرالد ال. مکاتب فلسفی و آراء تربیتی. ترجمه محمدجعفر پاک سرشت (1380). تهران: انتشارات سمت.
محمدی، سیدمهدی. بررسی تأثیر تلاش دانشجو، محیط دانشکده و رضایت دانشجو از دانشکده بر یادگیری، رشد و بهبود و دستاوردهای دانشجویان دانشگاه شیراز در سال تحصیلی 80-79، (چاپ نشده).
مهرمحمدی، محمود (1370). دیدگاههای برنامه درسی و مدلهای تدریس در جستجوی یک رابطه منطقی. فصلنامه تعلیم و تربیت، شماره 26.
مهرمحمدی، محمود (1376). برنامه درسی و آموزش، حوزه‌های علمی مستقل یا...؟ نشریه پژوهش در مسائل تربیتی، شماره 3 و 4.
مهرمحمدی، محمود (1381). برنامه درسی: نظرگاهها، رویکردها و چشم اندازها، مشهد: انتشارات آستان قدس رضوی.
میلر، جی. پی. (1983). نظریه‌های برنامه درسی. ترجمه محمود مهرمحمدی (1379). تهران: انتشارات سمت.
نصراصفهانی، احمد (1371). عوامل مؤثر در بهبود کیفیت تدریس. فصلنامه تعلیم و تربیت، شماره 29، بهار.
Aidridge, J.M., Fraser, B.J., Taylor, P.C., & Chung, C.C. (2000). Constructivist learning environments in a cross- national study in Taiwan and Australia. http: //A:constructivist %20 environment %20 survey. htm.
Biggs, J.B. (1987). Process and outcomes in essay writing. Research and Development in Higher Education, Vol. 9.
Biggs, J.B. (1989). Approaches to the enhancement of tertiary teaching. Higher Educaiwn Research and Development, Vol. 8, No 1.
Biggs, J. (2001). The reflective institution: Assuring and enhancing the quality of teaching and learning. Higher Education, Vol. 41.
Bontempo, J., & Morgan, P. (2003). Learning, teaching and assessment. Overview of key literature on learning, teaching and assessment. http:llwww.training. Wa. gov.au/resources/does/learing %20 teaching %20 & %20 Assessment %20 (WADT). pdf.
Bontempo, J., & Morgan, P. (2003). TAFE student survey validation measuring student perceptions of teaching, assessment and learning. http:/Iwww.Training. wa. gov. au/resources/doesI200l %20 survey %20 validation %20 (WADT) pdf.
Boulton, L. & Gillian, M. (1995). The SOLO taxonomy as a means of shaping and assessing learning in higher education. Higher Education Research and Development. Vol. 14 No 2, pp 143-154.
Brooker, R. Smith, D. (1996). Assessing tertiary students in an education faculty. Rhetoric and reality. Higher Education Research and Development. Vol. 15, No, 2 pp 163-175.
Candy, P.C. (1993). Learning theories in higher education: Reflections on the keynote day, HERDSA 1992. Higher Education Research and Development. Vol. 12 No, 1 pp 99-106.
Choy, S.C., Delahaye, B.L. (2002). Learing approaches, study orientation and readiness for self- directed learning of youth in TAEE. http:/! www.ncver. edu. au/research/papers/download/choydel.rtf.
Drew, P.Y., Watkins, D. (1998). Affective variables, learning approaches and academic achievement: A casual modelling investigation with Hong Kong tertiary students. BJ.eu.psy. Vol. 68, pp 173-188.
Entwistle, N.J. (1991). Approaches to learning and perception of the learning environment. Higher Education, Vol. 22, pp 201-204.
Eniwistle, N.J., Entwistle, A. (1991). Contrasting forms of understanding for degree examinations: The student experience and its implications. Higher Education, Vol. 22, pp 205-207.
Entwistle, N.J., Tait, H. (1990). Approaches to learning, evaluation of teaching and preferences for contrasting academic environment. Higher Education, Vol. 19, pp 169-194.
Geiger, M.A., Pinto, J.K. (1991). Changes in learning style performance during a three- year longitudinal study. Psychological Reports, Vol. 69, pp
755 -762.
Gow, L., Kember, D. (1993). Conception of teaching and their relationship to student learning. B.J, edu. Psy. Vol. 63, pp 20-33.
Guskin, A.E. (1996). Restructuring our universities, focusing on student learning. http://www.ala.orglacrl/invited/guskin.html.
Kember, D., Leung, D.Y.P. (1998). The dimensionality of approaches to learning: An investigation with confirmatory factor analysis on the structure of the SPQ and LPQ, BJ. edu.psy. Vol. 68, pp 395-407.
Kember, D., McKay, J. (1996). Action research into the uaIity of student learning. Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 97 No 5, pp 528-554.
Lebow, 1). (1994). Constructivist values of instructional system design: Five principles toward a new mindset. Educational Technology Research & Development (ETR & I)). Vol. 41, No. 3. pp 4-16.
Marton, F., Saijo, R. (1976). Symposium: Learning process and strategies -II on qualitative differences in learning -II outcomes as a function of the learner’s conception of the task. B.J. edu. Psy. Vol. 46, pp 115-127.
McCormick, Ft & Murphy, P. Curriculum: A focus on learning. File:/IA:Curriculum and learning, htm
McKey, J. Kember, D. (1997). Spoonfeeding leads to regurgitation: A better diet can result in more digestible learning outcomes: Higher Education Research and Development, Vol. 16, No 1, pp 55-67.
Meld, A., Hunter, S. (1998). Environments, experience, and outcomes: Using the College Student Experience Questionnaire for assessment and accreditation. http://www.evergreen. edu/institutional research/pdf/CSEQ presentation 98. pdf.
Muray-Harvey, R. (1994). learning styles and approaches to learning:
Distinguishing between concepts and instruments. BJ. edu.psy. Vol. 64, pp
373-388.
Norton, Linda S., Crowley, Catherine M. (1995). Can students be helped to learn how to learn: An evaluation of an approach to learning programme for first year degree student. Higher Education. Vol. 29
Pollio, H.R., Beck, H.P. (2000). When the tail wags the dog: Perceptions of learning and grade orientation in, and by, contemporary college students and faculty. The Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 71, No 1, pp 84-108.
Prosser, M. (1993). Phenomenography and the principles and practices of learning. Higher Education Research and Devolopment, Vol. 12, No 1, pp
21-31.
Prosser, M. & Millar, R. (1989). The how and what of learning physics. European Journal of the Psychology of Education, Vol. 4.
Ramsden, P. (1992). Learning to Teach in Higher Education. London:
Routledge.
Ramsden, P. & Entwistle, N.J. (1981). Effects of academic department on students approaches to studying. B.)’. edu. Pry. Vol. 51.
Sadler-Smith, E. (1996). Approaches to studying: Age, gender, and academic performance. Educational Studies, Vol. 22, No 3.
Samuelowicz, K. & Bain, J.D. (1992). Conceptions of teaching held academic teachers. Higher Eucation, Vol. 24, pp 93-111.
Samuelowicz, K & Bain, J.D. (2001). Revisiting academic beliefs about teaching and learning. Higher Education, Vol. 41, pp 299-323.
Samuelowicz, K. & Bain, J.D. (2002). Identifying academic orientations to assessment practice. Higher Education, Vol. 43, pp 173-201.
Scouller, K (1998). The influence of assessment method on students learning approches: Multiple choice question examination versus assignment essay. Higher Education, Vol. 35, pp 453-472.
Shale, 5. (2002). Higher education and higher learning. File:///A: hAUL %20 learning %20 and %20 teachingi-files /IAUL+1+2+1+main htm
Shale, S. & Trigwell, K. (2002). Student approaches to learning. http:/!www.learning. ox.ac.!iaul/IAUL+ 1+2+ 2+main.asp.
Sheppard, C. & Gilibert, J. (1991). Course design, teaching method and student epistemology. Higher Education, Vol. 22, pp 229-249.
Tang, T. & Eilliams, .1. (2001). Misalignment of learning context: An explanation of the Chinese learner paradox. Http:!!www.bus.qut.edu.!au! schools/economics/disc-papers-pre200l/tang- williams-79.pdf.
Taylor, R. & Hyde, M. (2002). Learning context and students’ perceptions of context influence student learning approaches and outcomes in Animal Science 2. ACE group, Teaching and Educational! Development Institute. The university of Queensland.
Trigwell, K & Prosser, M. (1996). Congruence between intention and strategy in university science teachers approaches to teaching. Higher Education, VoL 32, pp 77-87.
Trigwell, K & Prosser, M. (1997). Towards an understanding of individual acts of teaching and learning. Higher Education Research and Development, Vol. 16, No 2, pp 241-252.
Van Rossum, B.J. & Schenk, S.M. (1984). The relationship between learning conception, study strategy and learning outcomes. BJ. edu.Psy. Vol. 54.
Vermetten, Y.3., Vermunt, J.D. & Lodwijks, H.G. (1999). A longitudinal perspective on learning strategies in higher education: Different view points towards development. BJ. edu.Psy. Vol. 69, pp 221-242.
Vermunt, Jan D. (1998). The regulation of constructive learning processes. BJ. edu. Psy. Vol. 68.
Watkins, D. & Hattie, J. (1990). Individual and contextual difference in the approaches to learning of Australian secondary school students. Educational Psychology, Vol. 10.
Waugh, R.F. (1998). The Course Experience Questionnaire: A Rash measurement model analysis. Higher Education Research and Development, Vol. 17, No 1, pp 45-63.
Young, S. & Shaw, D.G. (1999). Profiles of effective college and university teachers. Journal of Higher Education, Vol. 20, No 6, pp 670-686.
Zidowecki, H. (1995). Curriculum: The course of life. File://A:Curriclum %20The%20Course%ZOof%2OLife.htm
)