نویسندگان
1 عضو هیأت علمی دانشکده روانشناسی و علوم تربیتی، دانشگاه تهران
2 کارشناس ارشد روانشناسی و آموزش کودکان استثنایی
چکیده
هدف پژوهش حاضر مقایسه اثربخشی روشهای بالینی و بهبود خود به خودی برای درمان لکنت زبان و بررسی علل و عوامل آشکار کننده آن نزد کودکان واجد ناروانی گفتار سنین سه تا هفت سال بوده است. نمونه مورد بررسی بیست و دو نفر از کودکان دارای ناروانی گفتار بودند که همراه والدین خود به مرکز مشاوره و خدمات روان‌شناختی توحید شهر تهران مراجعه کرده بودند. نمونه مورد مطالعه، در دو گروه همتاسازی شدند و بر مبنای روش بالینی و روش بهبود خود به خودی با یکدیگر مورد مقایسه قرار گرفتند. ابزار پژوهشی، شامل مصاحبه با والدین و ارزیابی ناروانی گفتار کودک از طریق ضبط گفتار خود انگیخته بود. در این پژوهش از آزمون غیرپارامتری U مان- ویتنی برای تحلیل داده‌ها استفاده شد. سرعت گفتار بر حسب تعداد کل کلمات بیان شده در سه دقیقه و میزان ناروانی گفتار بر اساس ارزیابی درمانگر و والدین در پیش آزمون و پس آزمون در دو گروه مقایسه شدند. ضریب توافق (tکندال) به دست آمده نشان داد که میزان ناروانی ارزیابی شده توسط درمانگر و والدین در پیش آزمون معنی‌دار بود. نتایج حاصل از مقایسه دو روش، تفاوت معنی‌داری را نشان داده است، به این معنی که روش بالینی نسبت به روش بهبود خود به خودی از اثربخشی بیشتری برخوردار بود.
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
The Efficacy of Clinical Method Versus Spontaneous Recovery Method in Treatment of Children’s Stuttering with Disfluency
نویسندگان [English]
- A. Beh-Pajooh 1
- S. Kamali 2
1 Faculty member of the Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, University of Tehran
2 Master of Psychology and Education of Exceptional Children
چکیده [English]
From the available body of research findings and clinical experiences, it can be concluded that some stuttering children recover spontaneously, while others persist in their stuttering. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of clinical method versus spontaneous recoveiy method in treatment of young children’s stuttering with speech disfluency. Twenty two preschool stuttering children (three to seven years of age) were randomly selected from Towheed Psychological Counselling Center in Tehran. After forming 2 matched groups of 11 children each, one group received clinical method whereas the next eleven children (the second group) did not obtain direct treatment (spontaneous recovery method). Tape- recorded speech samples of 3-minute length were obtained from the children and disfluent words were counted. Results indicated a marked decline over time in the mean frequency of disfluency in the first group (clinical method).
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
- stuttering
- speech disfluency
- spontaneous recovery method
- clinical menthod
Bloodstein, 0. (1995). A Handbook on Stuttering (5th ed.). San Diego:
Singular Publishing Group, Inc.
Conture, E.G. (1997). Evaluating childhood stuttering. In R.F. Curlee & G.M. Siegel (Eds.), Nature and Treatment of Stuttering: New Directions(2nd ed.), (PP. 239-256). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Two decades of change. Journal of Fluency Disorders, 21, 119-135.
Dickson, S. (1971). Incipient stuttering and spontaneous remission of stuttered speech. Journal of Cotnmunicatkin Disorders, 4. 99-110.
Gottwald, S.R. & Starkweather, C.W. (1995). Fluency intervention ,for preschoolers and their families in the public schools. Language, Speech and Hearing Services in Schools, 26, 117-126.
Hagnes, W.O. & Pindzola, R.H. (2004). Diagnosis and Evaluation in Speech Pathology (Sixth Ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson Education.
Johnson, W. (1995). A study of the onset and development of stuttering. In W. Johnson & R.R. Leutenegger (Eds.), Stuttering in Children and Adults (pp. 37-73). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
Karniol, R. (1995). Stuttering, language and cognition. Psychological Buleiin, 117, 109-124.
Logan, K.J. & Caruso, A.J. (1997). Parents as partners in the treatment of childhood stuttering. Seminars in Speech and Language, 18, (4) 309-326.
Mallard, AR. (1998). Using problem solving procedures in family management of stuttering. Journal of Fluency Disorder, 23(2). 197-137.
Meyers, S.C. & Freeman, F.J. (1985). Interruptions as a variable in stuttering and disfluency. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 28, 428-435.
Raming, P.R. (1993). Parent- clinician- child partnership in the therapeutic process of the preschool- and elementary- aged child who stutters. Seminars in Speech and Language, 14(3), 226-237.
Smith, A. & Kelly, E. (1997). Stuttering: A dynamic multifactorial model. In R.F. Curlee & G.M. Siegel (Eds.) Nature and Treatment of Stuttering:
New Directions (2nd ed.) (PP. 204-217). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Starlcweather, C.W., Gottwald, S.R. and Halfond, M.H. (1990). Stuttering Prevention: A Clinical Method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Van Riper, C. (1995). Speech Correction: An Introduction to Speech Pathology and Audiology (9th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
Wall, M.J. & Meyers, F.L. (1995). Clinical Management of Childhood Stuttering (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Wijnen, F. (1991). The Role of Sentence Formulation in Developmental Stuttering. Netherlands: Elsevier.
Wingate, ME. (1967). Stuttering Theory and Treatment. New York: Irvington Publisher.
Yoiri, E . & Amdrose, N. (1992). A Longitudinal study of stuttering in children: A preliminary report. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research,35,
755-760.
Yairi, E., Ambrose, N. & Cox, N. (1996). Genetics of stuttering in chlidren: A preliminary report. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 771-784.
Zebrowski, P.M. & Schum, R.L. (1993). Counseling parents of children who stutter. American Journal of Speech and Language Pathology, 2, 65-73.
Zebrowski, P.M. (1993). Parents’ Judgements of children’s fluency. Seminars in Speech and Language, 14 (3), 192-202.
)