Authors

1 Faculty member of the Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Shahid Chamran Universityof Ahvaz

2 Faculty member of the Faculty of Educational Sciences and Psychology, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz

10.22055/edus.2007.15984

Abstract

In the present paper diffusion of innovation theory was used to review instructional innovations. According to the theory of diffusion at the beginning an innovation is adopted by pioneers. If the results of application of such an innovation are positive, it would be adopted by others. As an innovation is adopted more and more, remaining people who haven't adopted the innovation decrease, so that the rate of adoption would reduce until another innovation replaces the previous one. A historical overview of the instructional innovations in the past few decades shows that popular innovations such as programmed instruction and educational television follow a bell shaped curve. Indeed (in the beginning), the rate of adoptions of these innovations increases, but after a short period, the rate decreased. A new popular innovation, electronic learning, followed such models. Despite its attraction, new findings indicate that e-learning projects are declining.

Keywords

 ـــــــ .(1383). عصر ارتباط. سال سوم، شمارة 102.
 
Association for Educational communication and Technology, (2006). The Definition of Educational Technology.Online available at http//:www.AECT.org
Carnevale, D. (1999, December 2). Online courses of 1,000 students will become common, industry group says. The Chronicle of Higher Education;http://www.chronicle.com/free/99/12/9912020lu.htm
Clark, R. C., & Mayer, R. E. (2003). E-Learning and the science of instruction: Proven guidelines for customers and designers of multimedia learning, San Francisco, CA: Pfeiffer.
Commission on Technology and Adult Learning. A Vision of E-Learning for America's Workforce. Alexandria, VA: American Society for Training and Development; Washington, DC: National Governors. Association, 2001. (ED).
Delio, Michelle, (2000). Report: Online Training ‘Boring’. Wired News, located at www.wired.com/news/business/0,1367,38504,00.html
Dublin, L., and Cross, J, (2003). Implementing eLearning: getting the most from your elearning investment Presentation at the ASTD International Conference, May 2003.
Greenagel, F. L, The Illusion of e-Learning: Why We Are Missing Out on the Promise of Technology. Phoenix, AZ: League for Innovation in the Community College, 2002. http://www.league.org/publication/whitepapers /0802.html.
Hanna, D. E. (1998, March). Higher education in an era of digital competition: Emerging organizational models. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Systems, 2(1); http://www.aln.org/ publications /jaln/v2n1/v2n1_hanna.asp
Nelson, H.G, &Stolterman, E. (2003).The design way: intentional change in an unpredictable world-Foundations and fundamentals of design competence. Englewood Cliffs: Educational Technology Publications.
Rogers,E.M, (1995). Diffusion of Innovations (4th ed.), New York: free press.
Romiszowski, A.J. (1972). APLET yearbook of educational and instructional technology 1972/73. Published for the Association for Programmed Learning and educational Technology (APLET), London:Kogan Page.
Romiszowski.A.J. (2004). How is e-learning baby? Educational Technology.V44, N1, PP5-27.
Surry, Daniel W, (1997). Diffusion Theory and Instructional Technology. Online available,http://intro.base.org/docs/diffusion/
Tiffin.J, (1980, Nov.). Educational television: A phoenix in Latin America? Programmed Learning and Educational Technology, (17)4, pp 257-261.
Wagner, E, (2000). Strategies for leveraging learning objects. PowerPoint presentation delivered at the TechLearn2000 conference, the Masie Center;http://www.techlearn.net /layout/default.cfm?page=sessiondetail &session=1236100
Zenger, J. &Uehlein.C, (2001). Why blended will win.T+D Journal, 55(8), pp 54-60.