سیف، علیاکبر (1384). سنجش فرایند و فراوردة یادگیری: روشهای قدیم و جدید. تهران: نشر دوران.
سیف، علیاکبر (1382). اندازهگیری، سنجش و ارزشیابی آموزشی (ویرایش سوم). تهران: انتشارات دوران.
Alderon, J. C., & Wall, D. (1993). Does washback exist? Applied Linguistics, 14, 2, 115-129.
Andrews, S., & Fullilove, J. (1994). Backwash and the use of English oral speculations on the impact of new examination upon sixth form English language testing in Hong Kong, New Horizons, 34, 46-52.
Au, C., & Entwistle, N. (1999). Memorization with understanding in approaches to study: cultural variation or response to assessment demands? paper presented at the European Association for research on Learning and Instruction Conference.Gothenburg University.
Barnes, S. M., Clarke, D., & Stephens, M. (2000). Assessment: the engine of systematic curriculum reform? Curriculum Studies, 32, 5, 623-650.
Baumgart, N., & Halse, C. (1999). Approaches to learning across cultures: The role of assessment, Assessment in Education, 6, 3, 321-339.
Biggs, J. B. (1995). Assumptions underlying to educational assessment, Curriculum Forum, 4, 2, 1-22.
Birenbaum, M. (1997). Assessment preferences and their relationship to learning strategies and orientations. Higher Education, 33, 71-84.
Boad, D. (1990). Assessment and the promotion of educational values. Studies in Higher Education, 15, 1, 101-110.
Booth, P., Luckett, P., & Mladenovic, R. (1999). The quality of learning in accounting education: The impact of approaches to learning on academic performance. Accounting Education: An International Journal, 8, 277–300.
Busato, V.V., Prins, F.J., Elshout, J.J., & Maker, C. (1998). Learning styles: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study in higher education. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 427-441.
Cano, F. (2005). Epistemological beliefs and approaches to learning: Their change through secondary school and their influences on academic performance, British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 203-221.
Cheng, L. (1997). How does washback influence teaching? Implications for Hong Kong, Language and Education, 11, 1, 38-54.
Cuneo, C. J., & Delsworth, H. (2002). The lost generation in e-learning: Deep and surface approaches to online learning.
Davidson, R. A. (2002). Relationship of study approach and exam performance. Journal of Accounting Education, 20, 29–44.
Diseth, A. (2001). Validation of Norwegian version of the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for Students (ASSIST): Application of structural equation modeling. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 45, 381-394.
Diseth, A., & Martinsen, Y. (2003). Approaches to learning, cognitive style, and motives as predictors of academic achievement, Educational Psychology, 23, 2, 195-207.
Diseth, A. (2003). Personality and approaches to learning as predictors of academic achievement. European Journal of Personality, 17, 143-155.
Duff, A., Boyle, E., Dunleavy, K., & Fergusen, J. (2004). The relationship between personality, approaches to learning, and academic performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1970-1920.
Eley,M.G. (1992) Differential adoption of study approaches within individual students, Higher Education, 23, pp. 231–254.
Elias, R. Z. (2005). Students’ approaches to study in introductory accounting courses. Journal of Education for Business, 12, 194-200.
Entwistle, J., & Tait, H. (1990). Approaches to learning, evaluations of teaching, and preferences for contrasting academic environments. Higher Education, 19, 169–194.
Entwistle, J., & Tait, H. (1990). Approaches to learning, evaluations of teaching, and preferences for contrasting academic environments. Higher Education, 19, 169–194.
Entwistle, N. J. (2002). Approaches to studying and levels of understanding: The influences of teaching and assessment. Higher Education, 19, 156–168.
Entwistle, N., Tait, H. & McCune, V. (2000) Patterns of response to an approaches to studying inventory across contrasting groups and contexts, European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15, 33–48.
Gow, L., Kember, D., & Cooper, B. (1994). The teaching context and approaches to study of accountancy students. Issues in Accounting
Hassall, T., & Joyce, J. (1998). Floating on the surface or in the deep end? Management Accounting, 76, 46–50.
Hattie, J., Biggs, J. B., & Purdie, N. (1996). Effects of learning skills interventions on student learning: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 66, 2, 99-136.
Laurillard, D. M. (1979). The process of student learning. Higher Education, 8, 395-409.
Lu, C., & Suen, H. K. (1995). Assessment approaches and cognitive styles. Journal of Educational Measurement, 32(1), 1–17.
Marton, F. & Saljo, R. (1976) On qualitative differences in learning: 1- Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4–11.
Marton, F. (1976) On non-verbatim training: level of processing and level of outcome. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 16, 273- 279.
Messick, S. (1996). Validity and washback in language testing. Language Testing, 13, 3, 241-256.
Minbashian, A., Huon, G.f., & Bird, K. D. (2004). Approaches to studying and academic performance in short-essay exams. Higher Education , 47, 161-176.
Morrow, K. (1986). The evaluation of communicative performance. In: Portal, M. (Ed).Innovations in Language Testing: Proceedings of the IUS/NFER Conference. London: NFER/Nelson, pp. 1-13.
Newstead, S. E. (1992). A study of two “quick-and-essay” methods of assessing individual differences in student learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 62, 299-312.
Orpwood, G. (2001). The role of assessment in science curriculum reform, Assessment in Education, Vol.8, No.2.
Popham, W. J. (1987). The merits of measurement-driven instruction, Phi Delta Kappa, 68, 679-682.
Rose, R. J., Hall, C. W., Bolen, L. M., & Webster, R. E. (1996). Locus of control and college students’ approaches to learning. Psychological…www.ecu.edu/cs-acad/fsonline/customcf/fsagenda /fsa408.htm
Sadler-Smith, E. (1997). “Learning style”: frameworks and instruments. Educational Psychology, 17, 15-63.
Scoullar, K. (1998). The influence of assessment method on students’ learning approaches: Multiple-choice question examination versus assignment essay, Higher Education, 35, 453-472.
Scoullar, K., & Prosser, M. (1994). Students’ experiences in studying for multiple-choice question examinations. Studies in Higher Education, 19, 267-279.
Septh, G., & Brown, R. (1990). Effects of college students’ learning styles and gender on their test preparation strategies. Applied Cognitive Psychology, vol.4, 189-202.
Smith, S. N., & Miller, R. J. (2005). Learning Approaches: Examination type, discipline of study, and gender. Educational psychology, 25, 1, 43-53.
Solomonides, I. & Swannell, M. (1995) Can students learn to change their approach to study? in: G.GIBBS (Ed.) Improving Student Learning. Through Assessment and Evaluation (Oxford, The Oxford Center for Staff Development.
Thomas, P., & Bain, J. (1984). Contextual dependence of learning approaches: The effects of assessment. Human Learning, 3, 227-240.
Tiwari,A. & Tang, C. (2000). Does portfolio assessment encourages students to adopt different assessment preparation strategies? eduforge.org/docman/.../1111/ePortfolio Project Research Report.pdf
Zhang, L. (2003). Does the big five predictlearning approaches? Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 1431-1446.
)