علوم تربیتی

شماره جاری

بر اساس شماره‌های نشریه

بر اساس نویسندگان

بر اساس موضوعات

نمایه نویسندگان

نمایه کلیدواژه ها

درباره نشریه

اهداف و چشم انداز

اعضای هیات تحریریه

اصول اخلاقی انتشار مقاله

بانک ها و نمایه نامه ها

پیوندهای مفید

پرسش‌های متداول

فرایند پذیرش مقالات

اطلاعات آماری نشریه

اخبار و اعلانات

تاثیر آموزش استدلال ورزی در محیط بازخورد همتای آنلاین بر روی فرایند و پیامدهای یادگیری

نوع مقاله : علمی- پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه واخنینگن ،واخنینگن، هلند

2 دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران

3 دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران،ایران.

4 دانشگاه تربیت مدرس، تهران، ایران.

چکیده

هدف این پژوهش بررسی تاثیر آموزش استدلال‌ورزی در محیط بازخورد همتای آنلاین بر روی فرایند و پیامد‌های یادگیری دانشجویان رشته علوم‌تربیتی است. جامعه پژوهش کلیه دانشجویان کارشناسی رشته علوم-تربیتی دانشگاه خوارزمی-واحد کرج- بود که 40 نفر از آن‌ها به عنوان نمونه پژوهش انتخاب، و به صورت تصادفی در یک طرح آزمایشی پیش و پس‌آزمون با گروه کنترل جایگزین، و به صورت جفت‌های یادگیری (20 جفت) همتا شدند. به منظور اجرای پژوهش، یک محیط بازخورد همتای آنلاین طراحی و تولید گردید. دانشجویان در این محیط به نگارش مقاله‌کوتاه و سپس ارائه بازخورد به مقاله‌کوتاه یک‌دیگر، و سپس بازنویسی آن براساس نظرات همتایان خود پرداختند. محتوای مقاله‌کوتاه و بازخورد همتای استدلالی دانشجویان با استفاده از یک طرح کدگذاری مورد تحلیل قرار گرفت. برای تحلیل داده‌های پژوهش از آزمون آماری تحلیل واریانس برای اندازه‌گیری مکرر، آزمون تی‌مستقل و آزمون همبستگی استفاده شد. نتایج نشان داد که ترکیبی از آموزش نگارش استدلالی و بازخورد همتا کیفیت مقاله‌های‌کوتاه و کیفیت بازخورد استدلالی، و همچنین میزان یادگیری تخصصی دانشجویان را افزایش می‌دهد. به علاوه بین فرایند و پیامد یادگیری بازخورد همتای دانشجویان همبستگی مثبت و معناداری وجود داشت.

کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله [English]

The effects of argumentation training in online peer feedback environment on process and outcomes of learning

نویسندگان [English]

  • Omid Noroozi 1
  • Javad Hatami 2
  • Saeed Latifi 3
  • Hashem Fardanesh 4

1 Wageningen University And Research, Wageningen, Netherlands.

2 Tarbiat Modares University , Tehran, Iran.

3 Tarbiat Modares University , Tehran, Iran.

4 Tarbiat Modares University , Tehran, Iran.

چکیده [English]

Introduction
Peer feedback is one of the promising educational strategy to improve students’ argumentative essay writing. However, resently, researchs have indicated that imlicit approach (Scripts and prompts) in online peer feedback environment improved student’s academic writing skills, these approaches bring some issues. More resently researches for solving this issues propose explicit approaches (sach as instruction and worked example). On the base, this study investigates the effects of online peer feedback environment with argumentation training on students’ learning process (argumentative feedback quality) and outcomes (argumentative essay quality and domain-specific knowledge acquisition) in the field of educational sciences.
Method
The population of the study was all undergraduate students of educational sciences at Kharazmi University in Karaj in which 40 students were randomly selected as a sample and were assigned to either experimental (with training and worked example) or control group (without any additional support) in a pre- and posttest design. They were then divided over 20 dyads and were asked to write an argumentative essay, engage in argumentative peer feedback with their learning partner, and then revise their essay based on feedback they received. In the peer feedback phase, the students of the experimental group received on how to write a high quality argumentative essay before giving feedback. To do so, a collaborative e-learning environment was designed and developed. A coding scheme was developed based on research literature to measure both argumentative essay and argumentative peer feedback quality.
Result
The results favoured students in the experimental condition in terms of their argumentative essay writing, argumentative peer feedback quality, and the acquisition of domain-specific knowledge. Furthermore, there was a positive and significant correlation between the learning process (argumentative peer feedback quality) and the outcome (argumentative essay writing quality).
Discussion
The results of this research indicated the importance of argumentation training as a support for peer feedback process in increasing the students’ feedback quality, academic writing and domain specific learning. Providing argumentation training befor peer feedback activity can familiarize students with criteria for a higher quality feedback, and thus improve the quality of their writing. Also, high quality feedback requires a more cognitive elaboration of learning material which can enhance student learning in subject at hand.
The results of this research indicated the importance of argumentation training as a support for peer feedback process in increasing the students’ feedback quality, academic writing and domain specific learning. Providing argumentation training befor peer feedback activity can familiarize students with criteria for a higher quality feedback, and thus improve the quality of their writing. Also, high quality feedback requires a more cognitive elaboration of learning material which can enhance student learning in subject at hand.


Keywords: online peer feedback environments, argumentative writing, argumentative peer feedback, argumentation training.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • online peer feedback environments
  • argumentative writing
  • argumentative peer feedback
  • argumentation training
مراجع
Amini, M., & Fazli nejad, N. (2010). Critical thinking skill in Shiraz University of medical sciences students. Medical Journal of Hormozgan University. 14(3), 213-218. [Persian]
Andrews, R. (1995). About argument: Teaching and learning argument. Continuum International Publishing Group Ltd.
Andriessen, J. (2006). Arguing to learn. In R. K. Sawyer (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (443–460). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Baba Mohammadi, H., & Khalili, H. (2004). Critical Thinking Skills of Nursing Students in Semnan University of Medical Sciences. [Original research article]. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 4(2), 23-31. [Persian]
Bacha, N. (2010). Teaching the academic argument in a university EFL environment. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 9(3), 229–241.
Brown, S. (2005). Assessment for learning. Learning and teaching in higher education, (1), 81-89.
Cooper, C. R., Cherry, R., Copley, B., Fleischer, S., Pollard, R., & Sartisky, M. (1984). Studying the writing abilities of a university freshman class: Strategies from a case study. New directions in composition research, 19-52.
Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Struyven, K. (2010). Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning. Learning and instruction, 20(4), 304-315.
Hyland, K. (1990). A genre description of the argumentative essay. RELC Journal, 21, 66–78. Doi:10.1177/003368829002100105
Hyland, P. (2000). Learning from feedback on assessment. The practice of university history teaching, 233-247.
Javidi Kalateh J., Abdadi, T., & Abdoli, A. (2010). Critical thinking skills of students in the baccalaureate program in Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. Studies in Education & Psychology, 11(2), 103-120. [Persian]
Kaufman, J. H., & Schunn, C. D. (2011). Students' perceptions about peer assessment for writing: Their origin and impact on revision work. Instructional Science, 39(3), 387–406
King, A. (2002). Structuring peer interaction to promote high-level cognitive processing. Theory into Practice, 41(1), 33–39.
Latifi, S. (2019). The effects of online scripted peer feedback environment on argumentative writing and argumentative feedback quality. Ph.D. Thesis, Tarbiat Modares University. [Persian]
Lizzio, A., & Wilson, K. (2008). Feedback on assessment: Students' perception of quality and effectiveness. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(3), 263–275
Noroozi, O., & Mulder, M. (2017). Design and evaluation of a digital module with guided peer feedback for student learning biotechnology and molecular life sciences, attitudinal change, and satisfaction. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 45(1), 31-39.
Noroozi, O., Biemans, H., & Mulder, M. (2016). Relations between scripted online peer feedback processes and quality of written argumentative essay. Internet and Higher Education, 31(2016) 20–31.
Nussbaum, E. M., Sinatra, M. G., & Poliquin, A. (2008). Role of epistemic beliefs and scientific argumentation in science learning. International Journal of Science Education, 30(15), 1977–1999
Qin, J., & Karabacak, E. (2010). The analysis of Toulmin elements in Chinese EFL university argumentative writing. System, 38(3), 444-456.
Ramage, J. D., Bean, J. C., & Johnson, J. (2018). Writing arguments: A rhetoric with readings. New York: Pearson Longman.
Reid, J. M. (1988). The process of composition (Vol. 1). Prentice Hall.
Rourke, L., & Kanuka, H. (2007). Barriers to online critical discourse. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 2(1), 105–126.
Shute, V. (2008). Focus on formative feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189
Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of educational Research, 68(3), 249-276.
Toulmin, S. E. (1958). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge University Press Cambridge.
Valavi, P., Bagherpour, S. & Shahsavari, J. (2016). Examining critical thinking in University graduate students. Research in Curriculum Planning, 13(49), 184-192. [Persian]
Wingate, U. (2012). ‘Argument!’ helping students understand what essay writing is about. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11, 145–154
Yarrow, F., & Topping, K. J. (2001). Collaborative writing: The effects of metacognitive prompting and structured peer interaction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(2), 261-282.
Yeh, S. S. (1998). Empowering education: Teaching argumentative writing to cultural minority middle-school students. Research in the Teaching of English, 49-83.
علوم تربیتی
دوره 26، شماره 2
دی 1398
صفحه 71-88
فایل ها
هم رسانی
ارجاع به این مقاله
آمار