The ability to predict students' perceived feedback based on the constructivist learning environment

Masnavi, Amir; Razavi, Seyed Abbas

doi:10.22055/edus.2019.31291.2925

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz , Ahvaz, Iran.

https://doi.org/10.22055/edus.2019.31291.2925

Abstract

Introduction.
This Study to aim was conducted to investigation to prediction students perceived feedbach basedon the constractivist learning context in a correlation design.

Method
The purpose of this study was to investigate students' perceived feedback and its predictability based on components of constructivist learning environment. This study is an applied research in terms of the purpose and is a type of descriptive-correlational researches in terms of data collection method. The population of the current study consisted of all undergraduate and master of art students of Shahid Chamran Universtiy of Ahvaz. 166 students were selected using simple random sampling method. The participation completed: the Perceived Feedback Scale (Haghani et al) and Constructivist Learning Environment Scale (Tylor). Data were analyzed using multiple regression analysis, Pearson correlation coefficient and independent t-test.
Result
The results showed that there is a positive and significant relationship between students’ perceived feedback and constructivist learning environment, Also regression analysis revealed that constructivist learning environment components (such as: relation to life, uncertainty, critical statement, shared control, student negotiation are predictions significant students’ perceived feedback and (%59 variance). In additions there aren’t difference between male and female students and in the rate of receiving feedback undergraduate and graduate students.

Discussion
The evidence from this study suggests that creating a constructivist learning environment through attention to its components can improve feedback in the teaching-learning process. Given the importance of feedback in the communication process, constructivist learning environments improve communication and improve the quality of education. Based on the findings of this study, it is suggested that teachers use active and learning-based approaches to teaching. Traditional approaches that are often teacher-centered and teaching-oriented, passive learners whom lack the opportunity to understand and create the structure of knowledge. It is also suggested that teachers in educational design take in to account the characteristics of a constructivist learning environment and adapt their teaching to them. In this way, students will experience a more effective environment and can adjust their performance by receiving more effective feedback.

Keywords

References

Araee., A. E., Hasani., M. & Shekari., A. (2014). The Study of the feedback of the Teachers, Administering the descriptive-quantitative evaluation. Research in Curriculum Planning, 2 (43), 119-131. [in Persian]

Askew, Susan; Lodge, Caroline. (2000). Gifts, ping-pong, and loops – linking feedback and learning. In: Askew, Susan [ed]. Feedback for learning. [pp1-17]. New York: Routledge.

Barzegar Bafrobi, K. (2011). Modeling the Relationships between Epistemological Beliefs, Perceptions of Constructive Learning Environment, High-Level Motivational and Cognitive Strategies with High School Students' Chemistry Performance. (Allame Tabatabaei University MA Desertation). [in Persian]

Borhani Zarandi, A. (2013). Investigating the Relationship between Teaching Approaches with Learning and Academic Performance of Postgraduate Students in Humanities, Literature and Engineering - Engineering of Yazd University in the Academic Year 2012-2013. (Yazd University MA Desertation) [in Persian]

Carnell, E. (2000). Dialogue, discussion and feedback–views of secondary school students on how others help their learning. In Feedback for learning (pp. 58-74): Routledge.

Chowdhury, R. R. & Kalu, G. (2004). Learning to give feedback in medical education. The Obstetrician & Gynaecologist, 6 (4), 243-247.

Clynes, M. P. & Raftery, S. E. (2008). Feedback: an essential element of student learning in clinical practice. Nurse Education in practice, 8 (6), 405-411.

Corbalan, G., Paas, F. & Cuypers, H. (2010). Computer-based feedback in linear algebra: Effects on transfer performance and motivation. Computers & Education, 55 (2), 692-703.

Ekhlasi, L. (2016). Studying the learning environment being constructivist, teaching approaches, and evaluating faculty members in the School of Engineering and Basic Sciences of Shahid Chamran University, Ahvaz. (Shahid Chamran University Of Ahvaz MA Desertation. ). [in Persian]

Ertmer, P. A., Richardson, J. C., Belland, B., Camin, D., Connolly, P., Coulthard, G., Mong, C. (2007). Using peer feedback to enhance the quality of student online postings: An exploratory study. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12 (2), 412-433.

Farhangi, A. (2018). Human communication.Tran.Tehran: Rasa. [in Persian]

Fazeli, A. & Karami, M. (2015). Teacher training students' experiences of instructional designing based on the constructivism approach. Journal Management System, 12 (45), 15. [in Persian]

Firozi, Z., Karami, M., Saeidi Rezvani, M. & Kareshki, H. (2015). Comparison The Effectiveness of Systemic and Constructivist Instructional Design Models in Designing the Problem–Based Environment of on-the-Job Training Program for Teachers. Journal OF Theory and Practice IN Curriculum, 3 (6), 53-70. [in Persian]

Gan, M. & Hattie, J. (2011). Instruction based on feedback. In: Mayer, Richard & Alexander, Patricia A. [eds]. Handbook of research on learning and instruction. . NewYork: Routledge. .

Goli., S., Rezaei., H., Haghani., F. & Goli., M. (2017). A Review of Feedback in Midwifery Education. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 17 (10), 92-101. [in Persian]

Haghani, F., Rahimi, M. & Ehsanpour, S. (2014). An Investigation of "Perceived Feedback" in Clinical Education of Midwifery Students in Isfahan University of Medical Sciences. Iranian Journal of Medical Education, 14 (7), 571-580. [in Persian]

Jabaryan Gero, M., Khosravi, M. & Mohammadifar, M. (2016). Effect of the teachers oral and written feedback on self- regulated learning and academic achievement in math. Curriculum Planning, 13 (49), 138-151. [in Persian]

Kannappan, A., Yip, D. T., Lodhia, N. A., Morton, J. & Lau, J. N. (2012). The effect of positive and negative verbal feedback on surgical skills performance and motivation. Journal of surgical education,69 (6), 798-801.

Khoshkholgl, I. & Islamieh, M. M. (2006). Development and Designing a Model for providing qualitative feedback in assessment of school achievement. Quarterly Journal of Educational Innovations, 5, 57-78. [in Persian]

Koka, A. & Hein, V. (2003). Perceptions of teacher’s feedback and learning environment as predictors of intrinsic motivation in physical education. Psychology of sport and exercise, 4 (4), 333-346.

Laffey, J., Tupper, T., Musser, D. & Wedman, J. (1998). A computer-mediated support system for project-based learning. Educational Technology Research and Development, 46 (1), 73-86.

McIlwrick, J., Nair, B. & Montgomery, G. (2006). “How am I doing?”: many problems but few solutions related to feedback delivery in undergraduate psychiatry education. Academic Psychiatry, 30 (2), 130-135.

Mehdinezhad, V. & Esmaeeli, R. (2015). Surveying the Relation between Faculty Members’ Teaching Approaches and Students’ Learning Approaches in University of Sistan and Balouchestan. Training & Learning Research, 21, 51-66. [in Persian]

Mory, E., Jonassen, D., Warmerdam, J. & Kleppe, A. (2006). Feedback research revisited. Handbook of research on educational communications and technology. In: New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Paas, F., Renkl, A. & Sweller, J. (2003). Cognitive load theory and instructional design: Recent developments. Educational psychologist, 38 (1), 1-4.

Pallant, J. (2013). SPSS survival manual: A step by step quide to data analysis usnig the SPSS program. (translated by Akbar Rezaie): Tabriz: Foruzesh. [in Persian]

Parsa, A. (2006). An analysis of Factors Affecting The Implemented & Learned Curriculum Phd Thesis in Curriculum Development. Shiraz university. Faculty of Educational Sciences, [in Persian]

Parsa, A. & Saketi, P. (2006). Learning outcomes, learning outcomes and student perceptions of the curriculum and curriculum. Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities University of Shiraz, 26 (3), 1-23. [in Persian]

Pat-El, R., Tillema, H. & Van Koppen, S. W. (2012). Effects of formative feedback on intrinsic motivation: Examining ethnic differences. Learning and Individual Differences, 22 (4), 449-454.

Shirdel, K., Mirzaian, B. & Hassanzadeh, R. (2013). Relationship between self-regulated learning strategies and achievement motivation of high school students. Curriculum Planning, 10 (36), 99-112. [in Persian]

Tayebi, V., Tavakoli, H. & Armat, M. (2011). Feedback delivery situation and related factors in clinical education of the students & staff members’ points of view in North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences. Journal of North Khorasan University of Medical Sciences, 3 (1), 69-74. [in Persian].

Valavi, P. (2013). Constructivism, new view in education. shahid chamran university of ahvaz pub. [in Persian].

Zolfaghari, A., Khosravi, M., Rafienia, P. & Sabahi, P. (2016). The effectiveness of teacher's written feedback on self-efficacy and achievement motivation of students. Journal of School Psycology, 5 (2), 55-70. [in Persian]

Journal of Educational Sciences

The ability to predict students' perceived feedback based on the constructivist learning environment

References

References

Volume 26, Issue 2
December 2019
Pages 155-176

The ability to predict students' perceived feedback based on the constructivist learning environment

References

References

Volume 26, Issue 2December 2019Pages 155-176

Volume 26, Issue 2
December 2019
Pages 155-176