نوع مقاله : علمی- پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشجو

2 عضو هیات علمی و دانشیار/دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز

3 استاد، دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز

4 دانشیار گروه مدیریت آموزشی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی تهران

چکیده

چکیده
تعیین رابطه علی ادراک از محیط یادگیری سازنده‌گرا و فکرسیستمی فردی با گرایش به یادگیری مادام‌العمر از طریق میانجی‌گری انگیزش درونی بود. تعداد شرکت‌کنندگان در پژوهش 450 نفر از دانشجویان کارشناسی دانشگاه شهیدچمران اهواز که در سال تحصیلی 94-95 مشغول به تحصیل بودند و به روش نمونه‌گیری تصادفی چندمرحله‌ای انتخاب شده بودند. روش پژوهش همبستگی از نوع معادلات ساختاری بود. ابزارهای استفاده ‌شده شامل پرسشنامه‌های «گرایش به یادگیری مادام‌العمر»، «ادراک از محیط یادگیری سازنده‌گرا»، «تفکر سیستمی فردی» و «انگیزش درونی» بود. ارزیابی الگوی پیشنهادی با استفاده از روش تحلیل معادلات ساختاری (SEM) انجام گرفت و برای آزمودن روابط غیرمستقیم از برنامه ماکرو پریچر و هیز استفاده شد. ارزیابی مدل پیشنهادی پژوهش برازش خوب و قابل قبول مدل را نشان داد. اثر مستقیم متغیرهای ادراک از محیط یادگیری سازنده‌گرا، تفکر سیستمی فردی و انگیزش درونی با گرایش به یادگیری مادام‌العمر و اثر مستقیم ادراک از محیط یادگیری سازنده‌گرا و تفکر سیستمی فردی با انگیزش درونی مثبت معنی‌دار به دست آمد. همچنین اثر غیرمستقیم ادراک از محیط یادگیری سازنده‌گرا و تفکر سیستمی فردی روی گرایش به یادگیری مادام‌العمر از طریق انگیزش درونی تأیید شد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

The causal relationship between perception of constructive learning environment and Individual systemic thinking with tendency to lifelong learning, mediated by intrinsic motivation in undergraduate students of Shahid Chamran University of ahvaz.

نویسندگان [English]

  • nahid Shafiee 1
  • nasser behroozi 2
  • Manijeh shehni Yailagh 3
  • Mahmood Abolghasemi 4

1 shahid chamran university of ahwaz

2 university of shahid chamran of ahvaz

3 professor of shahid chamran university of Ahvaz, Iran

4 Associate Professor, Faculty of Education & Psychology, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran. IRAN

چکیده [English]

Abstract
The purpose of this study was determining the causal relationship between the perception of constructivist learning environment and individual systematic thinking with a tendency to lifelong learning, mediated by intrinsic motivation. The participants include 450 undergraduate students at Shahid Chamran University that were studying in year of 1994-95 and selected by multi-stage random sampling method. The instruments used included questionnaires "tendency to lifelong learning", "perception of constructivist learning environment", "individual systematic thinking" and "intrinsic motivation". To evaluate of proposed model was performed Structural Equation Analysis Method (SEM) and was utilized to test the indirect relations of Macro Prechere and Hayes program. Results: The evaluation of the proposed model of the study showed good and acceptable fit of the model. The direct effect of variables from the perception of constructivist learning environment, individual systematic thinking, and intrinsic motivation with the tendency lifelong learning was significant to positive. The direct effect of the perception of constructivist learning environment and individual systematic thinking with positive intrinsic motivation was significant to positive. The indirect effect of perception of the constructivist learning environment and individual systematic thinking on the tendency to lifelong learning, through intrinsic motivation was confirmed.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Keywords: perception of constructive learning environment
  • individual systemic thinking
  • tendency to lifelong learning
  • intrinsic motivation
  • students
Afonso, P., Ramos, M. R., Saraiva, S., Moreira, C. A., & Figueira, M. L. (2014). Assessing the relation between career satisfaction in psychiatry with lifelong learning and scientific activity. Psychiatry Research, 217 (3), 210-214.
Assaraf, O. B. Z., & Orion, N. (2005). Development of system thinking skills in the context of earth system education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42 (5), 518-560.
Assaraf, O. B. Z., & Orion, N. (2010). System thinking skills at the elementary school level. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47 (5), 540-563.
Bakhtiarpoor, S. (2012). The relationship among critical thinking, metacognitions starategies and time management with academic performance in students of Islamic azad University Ahvaz Branch. Journal of Social Psychology, 7 (22), 5-19. [Persian]
Barhoumi, C., & kabli, T. H. H. (2013). The improvement of lifelong learning in Saudi Arabian university from individual learning to social constructivist e-learning environment based new educational technologies. European Scientific Journal, ESJ, 9 (13).
Barzegar Bafrooei.K., & Sheykholeslami, A. (2014). Psychometric characteristics of constructivist learning environment questionnaire. Journal of School Psychology, 2 (4), 6-24. [Persian]
Barzegar Bafroui, K., Sadipour,  E., Ebrahimi Qavam, S., & Farrokhi, N. A. (2012). A Model for Chemistry Students’ Performance on the Basis of Epistemological Beliefs, Perception of Constructivist Learning Environment, and High-Level Cognitive and Motivational Strategies. Educational Psychology, 8 (26), 178-211. [Persian]
Beynon, W. M., & Harfield, A. (2007). Lifelong learning, Empirical Modelling and the promises of constructivism. Journal of Computers, 2 (3), 43-55.
Canning, N. (2013). Practitioner development in early years education, self-determined learning: Heutagogy in action.
Carreira, J. M. (2012). Motivational orienations and psychological needs in EFL learning among elementary school students in Japan. System,40 (2), 191-202.
Chiţiba, C. A. (2012). Lifelong learning challenges and opportunities for traditional universities. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 46, 1943-1947.
Clement, J. J., & Steinberg, M. S. (2002). Step-Wise Evolution of Mental Models of Electric C ircuits: A" Learning-Aloud" Case Study. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 11 (4), 389-452.
Coll, R. K., France, B., & Taylor, I. (2005). The role of models/and analogies in science education: implications from research. International Journal of Science Education, 27 (2), 183-198.
Davidz, H. L., & Nightingale, D. J. (2008). Enabling systems thinking to accelerate the development of senior systems engineers. Systems Engineering,11 (1), 1-14.
Ebrahimi Koushkhmahdi, S., Karami, M., Ahanchian, M. R., & Masnan Mozaffari, P. (2014). Effect of constructivist education on the satisfaction and learning of participants in Web-based post-graduate education courses. Journal of Research in the New Approach in Educational Management, 5 (18), 1-24. [Persian]
Farhoush, M., & Ahmadi, M. (2013). The relationship of thinking styles and learnhng strategies with achievement motivation. Development Psychology, 9 (35), 297-306.[Persian]
Frank, M. (2010). Assessing the interest for systems engineering positions and other engineering positions' required capacity for engineering systems thinking (CEST). Journal of Systems Engineering, 13, 161-174.
Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self‐determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26 (4), 331-362.
Ghasemzadeh, Z. (2017). The Relationships between Critical Thinking and Motivational Beliefs with the Motivation of Academic Achievement in Secondary School Students. Journal of Psychology, Education & Social, 6 (23), 26-37.[Persian]
Habron, G., Goralnik, L., & Thorp, L. (2012). Embracing the learning paradigm to foster systems thinking. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 13 (4), 378-393.
Hase, S., & Kenyon, C. (Eds.). (2013). Self-determined learning: Heutagogy in action. A&C Black.
Jacobson, M. J. (2001). Problem solving, cognition, and complex systems: Differences between experts and novices. Complexity, 6 (3), 41-49.
Kadivar, P., Javady, M. J., & Sajedian, F. (2010). Relationship between thinking style and self-regulation with achievement motivation. Journal of Psychological Researches, 2 (6), 34-47. [Persian]
Karami, M. (2014). Designing and measuring the impact of constructivist learning environments on satisfaction, attitude and learning in higher education. Journal of Iranian Higher Education, 5 (2), 23-50.[Persian]
Kharazmi, A., Kareshki, H., & Abdekhodaee, M. S. (2012). The role of self-determination needs, information quality and applicability in the interest and continuity of e-learning by mediating internal motivation and satisfaction. Journal of Studies in Learning and Instruction, 4 (2), 1-20. [Persian]
Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2002). Motivation as an enabler for academic success. School Psychology Review, 31 (3), 313-328.
Lüftenegger, M., Schober, B., Van de Schoot, R., Wagner, P., Finsterwald, M., & Spiel, C. (2012). Lifelong learning as a goal–Do autonomy and self-regulation in school result in well prepared pupils?. Learning and Instruction, 22 (1), 27-36.
Madadpoor, P., Mohammadi far, M. A., & Rezaei, A. M. (2016). The relationship between epistemological beliefs, motivational beliefs and mathematics self-efficacy with mathematics progress. Journal of School Psychology,5 (1), 81-100. [Persian]
Martin, G. (2012). Understanding motivation for lifelong education, through biography, complexity and control (Doctoral dissertation, University of Birmingham).
McGarrah, M. W. (2014, 2015). Lifelong learning skills for college and career readiness: An annotated bibliography. College & career readness & success. Center at American Institutes for Research.
Patrick, H., Ryan, A. M., & Kaplan, A. (2007). Early adolescents' perceptions of the classroom social environment, motivational beliefs, and engagement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99 (1), 83.
Peters, O. (2009). The contribution of open and distance education to lifelong learning. The Routledge International Handbook of Lifelong Learning.
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82 (1), 33-40.
Rahimi Nasab, H., Safaei moghaddam, M., & Marashi, S. (2016). Examining the role of motivation in lifelong learning. National Conference on Philosophy of Education Society of Iran, May: 19-20. [Persian]
Raia, F. (2005). Students' understanding of complex dynamic systems. Journal of Geoscience Education, 53 (3), 297-308.
Raia, F. (2008). Causality in complex dynamic systems: A challenge in earth systems science education. Journal of Geoscience Education, 56 (1), 81-94.
Rastjoo, S., Sepehr, H., & Zandvanian, A. (2014). Investigating the relationship between critical thinking disposition, learning approaches and academic performance of graduate students of Yazd University. Journal of Iranian Higher Education, 6 (3), 63-84. [Persian]
Rowland, F., & Rubbert, I. (2001). An evaluation of the information needs and practices of part-time and distance-learning students in the context of educational and social change through lifelong learning. Journal of Documentation, 57 (6), 741-762.
Saif, D., & Kheyr, M. (2007). The relationship between motivational beliefs and learning approaches among a group of medical and engineering students of Shiraz universities. Journal of Education and Psychology, 1 (2), 57-82. [Persian]
Salari, M., Kareshki, H., & Abdekhodaee, M. S. (2013). The role of parent perception and internal motivation on students' critical thinking. Journal of Studies in Learning and Instruction, 5 (1), 64-67. [Persian]
Sederberg, D., & Bryan, L. A. (2010, June). Magnetism as a size dependent property: A cognitive sequence for learning about magnetism as an introduction to nanoscale science for middle and high school students. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference of the Learning Sciences, 1 (984-991).
Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Translated by Hafez Kamal Hedayat & Mohmmad Roshan (2010). Tehran, Industrial Management Institute. [Persian]
Sweeney, L. B., & Sterman, J. D. (2000). Bathtub dynamics: initial results of a systems thinking inventory. System Dynamics Review, 16 (4), 249-286.
Taylor, P. C., Fraser, B. J., & Fisher, D. L. (1997). Monitoring constructivist classroom learning environments. International Journal of Educational Research, 27 (4), 293-302.
The World Bank. (2003). Lifelong learning in the global knowledge economy: Challenges for developing countries. The World Bank. Translated by Mostafa Emadzadeh & Farimah Kasaiiyan (2007). Isfahan, ACECR. [Persian]
Tichy, N., & cardwell, N. (2006). The cycle of leadership: how great leaders tech their companies to win. New York: Harper Business.
Ubachs, G. (2009). USBM: university strategies and Business models for lifelong learning in higher education. Audiovisual & Culture Executive Agency.
UNESCO (1996). Learning: The Treasure within: Report to UNESCO of the international commission on the education for the twenty-firstc. The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.
Wang, X., & Hu, Q. (2012). Research Into the Improvement of College Students' Life-Long Learning Ability. How Accurately Does Breeam Measure Sustainability?, Creative Education, 3, 69-72.
Wilkins, R. (2000). Leading the learning society: The role of local education authorities. Educational Management & Administration, 28 (3), 339-352.
Xiaozhou, X. (2001). The role of the university in lifelong learning: perspectives from the People's Republic of China. Higher Education Policy, 14 (4), 313-324.
Zaraii Zavaraki, E., & Gorzin, Z. (2015). The Effects of Educational Computer Game based on EFM Model on Students' Motivation and Learning. Technology of instruction and learning, 1 (1), 20-37. [Persian]