نوع مقاله : علمی- پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشیار گروه علوم تربیتی دانشگاه ارومیه

2 دانشگاه ارومیه

3 گروه علوم تربیتی، دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی، دانشگاه ارومیه، ارومیه، ایران

4 دانشکده ادبیات و علوم انسانی دانشگاه ارومیه

چکیده

هدف پژوهش حاضر تحلیل رابطه مؤلفه‌های کیفیت زندگی کاری با ابعاد توانمندسازی روان‌شناختی در بین کارکنان دانشگاه ارومیه بود. پژوهش حاضر از نوع همبستگی است. جامعه آماری شامل کلیه کارکنان دانشگاه ارومیه به تعداد 720 نفر می‌باشد که 250 نفر آن‌ها از طریق نمونه‌گیری تصادفی طبقه‌ای انتخاب شدند. داده‌ها با استفاده از دو پرسشنامه استاندارد کیفیت زندگی کاری و توانمندسازی روان‌شناختی جمع‌آوری و با شیوه همبستگی کانونی تجزیه‌وتحلیل شدند. نتایج نشان داد که میزان همبستگی کیفیت زندگی کاری با ابعاد توانمندسازی روان‌شناختی 44/0 می‌باشد. شاخص لامبدای ویلکز 16/0 و آماره F مربوط به آن نیز 13/13 به دست آمد که در سطح 001/0 معنی‌دار است. هم‌چنین 63 درصد از واریانس ابعاد توانمندسازی روان‌شناختی با مؤلفه‌های کیفیت زندگی کاری تبیین می‌شود؛ بنابراین می‌توان چنین نتیجه‌گیری نمود که برنامه‌های کیفیت زندگی کارى نقش اساسی و مهمی در افزایش توانمندسازی نیروی انسانی و درنتیجه کارایی و اثربخشی سازمان‌ها بر عهده دارد.بنابراین می‌توان چنین نتیجه‌گیری نمود که برنامه‌های کیفیت زندگی کارى نقش اساسی و مهمی در افزایش توانمندسازی نیروی انسانی و درنتیجه کارایی و اثربخشی سازمان‌ها بر عهده دارد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Analysis of the relationship between the components of quality of working life and dimensions of psychological empowerment

نویسندگان [English]

  • Alireza Ghaleei 1
  • behnaz mohajeran 2
  • Zeinolabedin Darvishi 3
  • farshid Ashrafi Salimkandi 4

1 Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences, Urmia University

2 Faculty of Literature and Humanities, Urmia University

3 Department of Educational Sciences, Faculty of Literature & Humanities, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran

4 Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences, Urmia University

چکیده [English]

This study aimed to analysis of the relationship between the components of quality of working life and dimensions of psychological empowerment a mong the staffs of Urmia University. The present study is correlational. The population consisted of 720 Urmia University Staff; That 250 person of them was selected through random sampling and With Morgan table. The Data required by using two standard questionnaires quality of working life and psychological empowerment were collected and by using Canonical Correlation were analyzed. The results showed that the correlation between the quality of working life and the dimensions of psychological empowerment was 0.44. Wilks Lambda index for this connection was 0.16. The F-statistic of 13/13, which is also significant in 0/001. Also, 0.63 percentage variance between dimensions of psychological empowerment with components of quality of working life is explain. Therefore, it can be concluded that quality of life work programs play a major role in increasing the empowerment of human resources and, consequently, the efficiency and effectiveness of organizations.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • "quality of working life"
  • "psychological empowerment"
  • "Urmia University staff"
Abdollahi, B. (2005). Psychological empowerment of human resources Views
and Dimensions, Third International Management Conference, Tehran. [Persian]
Abdollahi, B. (2009). Psychological Empowerment of Staff: Dimensions and Validation Based on Structural Equation Modeling, Journal of Research and Planning in Higher Education, 35 & 36, 64-37. [Persian]
Abdollahi, B., & Naveh Ebrahim, A. R. (2006). Empowering employees. Gold Key to Human Resource Management, Tehran: Virayesh Publishing. [Persian]
Abtahi, H., & Abbasi, S. (2007). Empowerment of Personnel, First Edition, Tehran: Publications of the Institute for Research and Management Training. [Persian]
Amirkhani, A. H. (2008). Psychological empowerment of human resources: Perspectives and dimensions, Peak of Light, 6 (1) (Management 2), 41-51. [Persian]
Ballou, B., Norman, H., & Goodwin, N. H. (2007). Quality of work life. Strategic Finance, 89 (4), 40-51.
Bogler, R., & Somech, A. (2004). Influence of teacher empowerment on teacher organizational commitment, professional commitment and organizational citizenship behavior in schools". Teaching and Teacher Education. (20), 277-289.
Budla'i, H., Kusheki Jahromi, A., & Sattar Nasab, R. (2011). Organizational Learning and Trust, Mediating Rings between Psychological Empowerment and Organizational Commitment, Management Process and Development, 24 (75), 67-94. [Persian]
Filippo, E. B. (1997). Personal management, McGrawHill Publishing.
Galavandi, H., & Amrahi, A. (2012). Investigating the Relationship between Quality of Work Life and Cognitive Dimensions of Empowerment in the University with Islamic Approach, Management at Islamic University, 1 (3), 447-464. [Persian]
Ganguly, R. (2011). Quality of work life and job satisfaction of a group of university employees, Asian Journal of Management Research, (1), 209 – 216.
Jokinen, E., & Heiskanen, T. (2013). Is the measured good quality of working life equivalent to strategically strong HRM system?. Procedia-social and behavioral sciences, 81, 131-141.
Mahdad, A., Mahdavi Rad, N., & Golparvar, M. (2011). Relationship between Quality of Work Life and Organizational Commitment and its Components, Social Psychology (New Findings in Psychology), 6 (20), 41-53. [Persian]
Martel, J. P., & Dupuis, & G. (2006). Quality of work life: theoretical and methodological problems, and presentation of a new model and measuring instrument. Social Indicators Research, 77 (2), 333-345.
Mehdi Zadeh Ashrafi, A., & Ilka, H. A. (2010). Investigating the relationship between quality of work life (QWL) and the performance of employees of Islamic Azad University of Firoozkooh based on Walton's model, Researcher (Management), 7 (20), 1-8. [Persian]
MirKamali, S. M. (2010). Leadership and educational management, Tehran: Publication of the position. [Persian]
Mohammadi, M. (2001). Manpower Empowerment, Journal of Management Studies, 31 and 32, 232-211. [Persian]
Mortazavi, M. (1999). Empowerment and its Techniques to Change Organizational Culture, Journal of Management, 9 (38), 42-44. [Persian]
O’Reilly C. A. J., Chatman, D., & Caldwell F. (1991). People and Organizational Culture: A Profile Comparison Approach to Assessing Person-organization Fit. Academy of Management Review Journal. 34 (3), 516
Salimi, S., & Sa'idian, N. (2014). Investigating the relationship between quality of work life, psychological empowerment and the interactive effect of demographic variables on productivity of employees in Zahedan municipality, productivity management (beyond management), 7 (28), 7-32. [Persian]
Shareef, R. (1990). QWL programs facilitate change. Personnel Journal, (69), 5067.
Shekari, H., & Asgari, M. (2014). Identifying and Prioritizing Indicators Affecting Knowledge Management Success, International Conference on Accounting and Management, Tehran, Mehr Ishraq Conferences, Tehran University, http://www.civilica.com/Paper-MOCONF01-MOCONF01_ 1063 .html. [Persian]
Sherry, A., & Henson, R. K. (2005). Conducting and Interpreting Canonical Correlation Analysis in Personality Research. International Journal of Service Industry Management, (84), 37-48.
Short, P. M., Greer, G. T., Mevin, W. M. (1994). Creating empowered schools: Lessons in change. Journal of Educational Administration, 32 (4), 30-52.
Sirgy, M., Joseph, D. E., Fraty, P. S., & Bong, L. (2001). A new measure of quality of work life (QWL) based on need satisfaction and spillover theories. Social Indicators Research, 55 (14), 247-259.
Thomas, H. W., & Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment an “interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation. Academy of management reviw, (15), 666-681.
Walton, Richard E. (1973). Quality of Work Life, What Is It?”, Sloan Management Review Journal, Fall, 11-21.
Yazdani, S. (2013). The Study of the Relationship between Organizational Justice and the Quality of Work Life of Primary School Teachers in East Azarbaijan Province, Journal of Sociological Studies, 6 (21), 41-58. [Persian]