نوع مقاله : علمی- پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 دانشگاه هرمزگان

2 عضو هیئت علمی دانشگاه هرمزگان و ریاست دانشگاه

3 عضو هیئت علمی دانشگاه مازندران

چکیده

این پژوهش با هدف شناسایی ابعاد و مؤلفه‌های کاربرد درس پژوهی درس ریاضی در مدارس ابتدایی استان مازندران به‌منظور ارائه مدل مفهومی انجام شده است. روش مورد استفاده در این پژوهش، روشی آمیخته اکتشافی متوالی بوده است. جامعه تحقیق شامل صاحب‌نظران حوزه درس پژوهی، کلیه معلمان ریاضی و مدیران مدارس ابتدایی استان مازندران به تعداد 10700 نفر بوده است. روش نمونه‌گیری در بخش کیفی، روش موارد مطلوب شامل 16 نفر و در بخش کمی تصادفی ساده شامل 370 نفر بود. ابزار جمع‌آوری داده‌ها مصاحبه‌های عمیق و اکتشافی و پرسشنامه محقق ساخته (85 سؤالی) استخراج شده از مصاحبه‌ها بوده است. روش تجزیه‌وتحلیل داده‌ها در مرحله کیفی روش برخاسته از داده‌ها و در مرحله کمی تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی، تأییدی و آزمون فریدمن می‌باشد. یافته‌ها نشان داد که ابعاد درس پژوهی، شامل جنبه انسانی، جنبه ساختاری، جنبه فرهنگی، جنبه مدیریتی و جنبه پداگوژیکی است. همچنین نتایج آزمون فریدمن نشان داد که از نظر پاسخگویان حاضر در این تحقیق اولویت اول مربوط به جنبه پداگوژیکی، اولویت دوم مربوط به جنبه فرهنگی، اولویت سوم مربوط به جنبه ساختاری، اولویت چهارم مربوط به جنبه انسانی و اولویت پنجم مربوط به جنبه مدیریتی است.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات

عنوان مقاله [English]

Identification of the dimensions and components of the application of Mathematics lesson study In elementary schools in Mazandaran province in order to provide a conceptual model

نویسندگان [English]

  • amir pourahmadali 1
  • Aliakbar Sheykhi fini 2
  • Hossein Zeinalipour 1
  • Samad Izadi 3

1 Ph.D Student of Hormozgan University

2 Hormozgan University faculty member and head of university

3 Faculty Member of Mazandaran University

چکیده [English]

This research aims to identify the dimensions and components of the application of studying mathematical lessons in elementary schools of Mazandaran province in order to present a conceptual model. The method used in this research has been a sequential exploratory mixed method. The research community included the experts of the field of lesson study, all teachers of mathematics and principals of primary schools in Mazandaran province numbered 10700 people. Sampling method in the qualitative section, the method of desirable items includes 16 people and in the quantitative section, A simple random sample of 370 people. Data collection tools Deep and exploratory interviews and A researcher-made questionnaire (85 questions) was extracted from the interviews. The method of analyzing data in the qualitative stage of the data-based method and in the quantitative stage exploratory factor analysis, confirmation, And Friedman test. The findings showed that the dimensions of studying include human aspect, structural aspect, cultural aspect, managerial aspect and pedagogical aspect. Also, the results of Friedman's test showed that According to the respondents in this research, the first priority is the pedagogical aspect, the second priority is related to the cultural aspect, the third priority relates to the structural aspect, the fourth priority relating to the human aspect and the fifth priority to the management aspect.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Lesson Study
  • mathematics
  • Elementary schools in Mazandaran province
Abdoli, J., & Ali Ashrafi, M. (2016). Analyze and study the nature of education and education in schools. The 2nd International Humanitarian Conference with a Native-Islamic Approach and Emphasizing New Research. [Persian]
Bazargan, A. (2015). Introduction to qualitative and mixed research methods. Tehran: Aqa Publication. [Persian]
Behzad, M. (2002). An excerpt from the macro scheme of the study of mathematical problems of the country, the Iranian Mathematical Society. Tehran: Institute of Education. [Persian]
Beninghof, A. M. (2015). To Clone or Not to Clone Co- Teaching: Making It Work, Educational Research, 4, 10-15.
Brown, S., & Wiburg, K. (2007). Lesson study communities: Increasing achievement with diverse students. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Bunono, A. G. (2012). Lesson study: Restructuring Teacher Professional Development in the United States, Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation of Philosophy, and Lesley University.
Carnous, M. (2006). Globalization and Educational Reform: What planners need to know. Tehran: Yastoron. [Persian]
Caskey, S. J., & Lenski, M. (2010). Using the lesson study approach to plan for student learning. Educational Psychology Reader, 1, 441-450.
Cheng, L. P., & Yee, L. P. (2012). A Singapore Case of Lesson Study. The Mathematics Educator, 21 (2), 34-57.
Creswell, W. (2011).  Educational research: planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research. 4th ed. Boston: Pearson pub.
Farzanpour, A, Nateghi, F & Seifi, M. (2017). Examining the Principles Governing the Excellence of Curriculum Exercise. Quarterly Journal of Research in Fifth Grade Number One. [Persian]
Fernandez, C., & Yoshida, M. (2009). Lesson study: A Japanese Approach to improving Mathematics teaching and Learning, New York: Routledge.
Ghazi, S. (2012). Investigating the Pattern of Learning on Creating a Learning Organization Approach in Schools. Master's Thesis, Mazandaran University. [Persian]
Glaungernik, B. (2011). Investigating the effect of lessons on the critical thinking of teachers in areas. Mashhad. Master thesis, Payam Noor University, Ray. [Persian]
Inprasitha, M., & Changsri, N. (2014). Teachers’ beliefs about teaching practices in the context of lesson study and open approach. Procardia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 116, 437- 442.
Kelly, A.V. (2011). The Curriculum Theory and Practice. London: SAGE Publications
Lewis, C. (2002). Lesson study: How can it build system-wide improvement?Educational study. 12 (9), 21-38.
Lewis, C. (2009). What Are the Essential Elements of Lesson Study? Educational Study. 21 (5), 52-65.
Lewis, C., Perry, R., & Hurd, J. (2009). Improving mathematics instruction through lesson study: A theoretical model and North American case. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 12, 285-304.
Lichtman, M. (2006). Qualitative research in education: A user’s guide. London: Sage
Matoba, M., Crawford, K., & Sarkararani, M. R. (2006). Lesson Study: International Perspective on Policy and Practice. Beijing: Educational Science Publishing House.
Meyer, R. D. (2005). Lesson Study: The Effects on Teachers and Students in Urban Middle Schools. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation of Curriculum and Instruction, Baylor University.
Mohammadpour, A. (2011). Out of the Fundamental Philosophical and Practical Foundations of Combined Research in Social Sciences and Behavioral Sciences. Tehran: Publications of Sociologists. [Persian]
Mostofo, J. (2013). Using Lesson Study with Preservice Secondary Mathematics Teachers: Effects on Instruction, Planning, and Efficacy to Teach Mathematics. Doctoral Dissertation, Arizona State University.
Murata, A., & Takahashi, A. (2002). District-level lesson study: How Japanese teachers improve their teaching of elementary mathematics. Council of Teachers of Mathematics Annual Meeting, Las Vegas, NV.
Ngang, T. K. & Sam, L. CH. (2015). Principal Support in Lesson Study. Journal of Social and Behavioral Sciences, 205, 134-139.
Roshan Ghyas, E. (2014). Investigating the Impact of Study on the Professional Qualifications of Elementary Teachers in a District in a Sari City. Master's Thesis, Mazandaran University.
Saito, E., Hawe, P., Hadiprawiroc, S., & Empedhe, S. (2008). Initiating Education Reform through Lesson Study at a University in Indonesia, Educational Action Research, 16 (3), 391-406.
Sarkararani, M. R. (2005). Teacher Participatory Research in Classroom: Japan's Experience in Teacher Training at School. Quarterly Journal of Education and Training, 59, 76-61. [Persian]
Sarkararani, M. R. (2006). Transnational Learning: The Integration of JugyouKenkyuu into Iranian Teacher Training, In: Lesson Study: International Perspective on Policy and Practice, Educational Science Publishing House, 32 (8), 37-75.
Sarkararani, M. R. (2008). Education culture in Japan. Tehran: Rozname negar publishing. [Persian]
Sarkararani, M. R., & Fukaya, K. (2010). Learning beyond Boundaries: Japanese Teachers Learning to Reflect and reflecting to learn, Child research. Educational Science Publishing, 48 (8), 12-20.
Sarmad, V., Bazargan, A., & Hejazi, A. (2012). Research Methods in Behavioral Sciences. Tehran: Agah Publishing. [Persian].
Scherer, M. (2017). What We didn’t Know When We Co- Taught. Making It Work, 73 (4), 7-12.
Soleimani, I., & Ahmadi, H. (2017). Identifying the Barriers to Exercise Studies: A Case Study of Primary Schools in Education in the City of Dharamsh (mixed research). Teaching Research, 5. [Persian]
Steppang, J., Apple, J., Leung, M., Nornermangan, M., & Mitchell, M. (1389). Leading the curriculum: Practical guidance for teachers and managers. Tehran: Alavi Hekmat. [Persian]
Stigler, J. W., & Hiebert, J. (2009). The teaching gap: best ideas from the world’s teaching for improving education in the classroom. New York: Free Press. Journal of Teaching and Teacher Education, 61, 211-224.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (2006). Principles and Methods of Qualitative Research the Basic Theory: Principles and Practices Tehran: Humanities Research Institute. [Persian]
Vrikki, M. Warwick, P. Vermunt, J. D. Mercer, N. & Halem, N. V. (2017). Teacher learning in the context of Lesson Study: A video-based analysis of teacher discussions. 25, 44-57.
Wood, K., & Sithamparam, S. (2015). Realizing learning: Teachers’ Professional Development, Routledge.
Yazdchi, S. (2004). The Effectiveness of Implementation of a Visual Design in Learning the First-Year Math Course in Isfahan. Education Organization of Isfahan Province. [Persian]
Yoshida, M. (1999). Lesson study: A case of a Japanese approach to improving instruction through school-based teacher development (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of Chicago, Chicago, IL.
Yoshida, M. (2005). An Overview of Lesson Study. In P. Wang-Iverson & M. Yoshida (Eds.), Building our understanding of lesson study, Philadelphia: Research for Better Schools, 24, 3-14.