Curriculum Development
Hedyeh Mohamadzadeh; Afsaneh Naraghiadeh; Parvin Samadi
Abstract
IntroductionThe present research was conducted with the aim of analyzing the responsibility of primary school students from the perspective of teachers, administrators and parentsMethodThis study was qualitative in terms of applied purpose, with thematic analysis approach. The participants in the research ...
Read More
IntroductionThe present research was conducted with the aim of analyzing the responsibility of primary school students from the perspective of teachers, administrators and parentsMethodThis study was qualitative in terms of applied purpose, with thematic analysis approach. The participants in the research were teachers, administrators and parents. The research tool was a semi-structured interview that reached theoretical saturation with 8 teachers, 7 managers and 9 parentsResultsThe results of the analysis of the theme in the teachers' section for examples of responsibility in two sub-categories: individual (personal) and class (professional); For factors affecting responsibility, there are four sub-categories of family factor, social factor, personality factor and educational factor; For the teacher's actions to make students responsible, two sub-categories of formal assignments and informal assignments; For the evaluation method, two quantitative and qualitative sub-categories were extracted from responsibility, and three short-term, medium-term and long-term sub-categories were extracted for the consequences of responsibility.DiscussionAlso, the results of the content analysis of managers' interviews for examples of responsibility under individual and group categories, to affect responsibility under family, personal, environmental and educational categories; The manager's actions for students' responsibility of team, individual, social and organizational categories were extracted and for the consequences of responsibility, two sub-categories of individual and social were extracted. In general, when a person learns from childhood to create a balance and be responsible for his potential and actual abilities and the expectations that exist from him, he will undoubtedly be successful in his educational, career and life destiny. Less confusion and failure.Since developing societies need responsible and self-sufficient people, therefore today's people must accept responsibility for their lives and destiny more than ever, and this is not possible unless the basis of education is based on increasing children's understanding. and teenagers about their role in building their destiny and quality of life, and to achieve this goal, effort and careful planning is necessary. Teaching responsibility helps children and teenagers to accept responsibility for their feelings, knowledge and behavior and also to accept that they are responsible for their health, success, relationship with others and relationship with the environment.
Curriculum Development
Somayeh Saedi; Parvin Samadi; parvin Ahmadi
Abstract
IntroductionReforming the mission of universities in the field of employment has been considered in the world for three decades. Due to the continuous social changes, education and academic research should be in the direction of solving social, economic, cultural and technological problems of society ...
Read More
IntroductionReforming the mission of universities in the field of employment has been considered in the world for three decades. Due to the continuous social changes, education and academic research should be in the direction of solving social, economic, cultural and technological problems of society in order to be able to solve some of the issues related to employment and gaining new job competencies. The aim of this study was to validate the university curriculum model based on Fugit's employability model.MethodThe present study was conducted in terms of the type of development goal and quantitatively with a survey approach. The research instrument was a researcher-made questionnaire and the statistical population was all undergraduate students in comprehensive public universities in Tehran. Sampling was Stratified Random Sampling method. The statistical sample size according to Cochran's formula for was estimated at 384. Due to the limitations, 290 questionnaire samples were completed and entered into the analysis process. The obtained data were analyzed using analysis test. ResultsFindings indicated that adaptability to employability skills by 0.529, job identity to employability skills by 0.807 and socio-human capital to employability skills They have a positive and direct effect of 0.424. Also, content on human-social capital (0.960), teaching method on human-social capital (0.998), teaching method on job identity (0.236), evaluation method on human-social capital (1.23), Learning characteristics on human-social capital (0.247), teaching characteristics on job identity (1.39), teaching characteristics on adaptability (0.382), learning environment on job identity (13/13) 1) Finally, the learning environment affects adaptability (2.06). DiscussionThe sum of extracted elements, components and concepts provides a basic model of university curriculum based on students' entrepreneurial competencies. The higher education curriculum framework based on entrepreneurial competencies for students, while creating a new lens, forms a window through which the higher education community can look at its possibilities with a fresh perspective, and also provides this possibility. make it possible to look at the strange and normal separation of the university and other organizations and institutions outside the borders of the university with an enlightened view.
