شناسایی مولفه های "دانش دبیران" در آموزش و پرورش شهر اهواز

نوع مقاله: علمی- پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 عضو هیأت علمی دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز

2 عضو هیئت علمی دانشگاه شهید چمران

3 دانش آموخته رشته مدیریت آموزشی دانشگاه شهید چمران اهواز

چکیده

هدف اصلی این پژوهش، شناسایی مولفه های دانش دبیران در آموزش و پرورش شهر اهواز بود. پژوهش مذکور از نظر هدف در حیطه پژوهش‌های «نظری-کاربردی» و به لحاظ روش، آمیخته از نوع اکتشافی متوالی(کیفی و کمّی) است. در بخش کیفی بر اساس قاعده اشباع نظری 11 نفر از دبیران شهر اهواز به روش نمونه گیری هدفمند و با استفاده از الگوی موارد مطلوب انتخاب شدند و در این پژوهش مشارکت کردند. حجم نمونه برای بخش کمّی بر اساس فرمول کوکران 346 نفر برآورد شد و از روش نمونه گیری طبقه‌ای تصادفی برای انتخاب آنها استفاده شد. برای جمع آوری داده‌های کیفی از روش مصاحبه نیمه ساختمند و برای داده‌های کمّی، از پرسشنامه محقق ساخته استفاده شده است. در بخش کیفی به منظور تجزیه و تحلیل مصاحبه‌ها، از روش تحلیل محتوای استنتاجی مصاحبه ها و برای تجزیه و تحلیل داده های کمّی، از تحلیل عاملی اکتشافی استفاده شده است. نتایج به‌دست آمده نشان داد که مولفه های دانش دبیران شامل دانش مهارتی (مهارت در تدریس، مهارت ارزشیابی و ...)؛ دانش شناختی (شناخت دانش آموزان، شناخت قوانین و مقررات و ...)، دانش رویه‌ای (تدریس عملی، دانش ارزشیابی و ...)؛ دانش ارتباطی- تعاملی (تعامل با مدیر، تعامل با اداره و ...)؛ دانش مدیریت و برنامه ریزی (رهبری و مدیریت کلاس و ...) و دانش فن آوری (توانایی استفاده از محتوای الکترونیکی، کامپیوتر و اینترنت) می‌باشد.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

Identifying components of teachers’ knoeledge in Ahvaz education

نویسندگان [English]

  • Hamid Farhadi Rad 1
  • Sakineh Shahi 2
  • Amin Allah Khalili 3
1 Education & Psychology, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz
2 Faculty member of Shahid Chamran university
3 Education & Psychology, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz
چکیده [English]

Abstract:
In this research we assume that knowledge is recognized as a strategic and key asset for all organizations and education systems too. Therefore the appropriate use of knowledge is an effective factor in the success/failure of educational organizations and teachers are main people that could create, save and share knowledge in the school systems. In the other hand we know that teaching, learning and educating process are the core of any education system and are most important duties of teachers. Based on this assumption the best teachers are those who their work lead to the highest levels of learning in school especially students’ learnings. But what is teacher’s knowledge that guides his/her teaching and learning activities and other organizational behaviors?
It should be said that performing the above activities without identifying teachers' knowledge and its dimensions is difficult. Therefore it is important to school as an organization that know about teacher’s knowledge component and how to manage it in order to provide proper context for, creating, saving, maintaining, developing, sharing and exchanging of knowledge at the school level. Based on theoretical foundations we found that teacher’s knowledge has a wide range including cognation knowledge, experiences, skills, perspectives and even the value and mentality system of the teachers. Studying in a real context could lead to better understanding of teacher’s knowledge so the main purpose of this study aimed to identify and introduce the components and dimensions of teachers’ knowledge in Ahvaz education system.
By purpose this research is a “Theoretical-Applied” research and by method is mixed method (Sequential Exploratory). In the qualitative part, based on theoretical saturation 11 teachers who were convinced and satisfied selected and participated in this research. They were selected by purposeful and best intensity case sampling. Sample size in quantitative part based on Cochran formula 346 persons estimated and they selected by stratified random sampling method. Semi-structured interview with participants was used to collect qualitative data and quantitative data gathered by a questionnaire that made by researcher. For date analysis, interviews inductive content analysis was used and exploratory factor analysis was used for quantitative data analysis. The results showed that, teachers knowledge can be classified into 6 components consists of, cognitive knowledge (recognition of students, rules and regulations …), proficiency knowledge (Teaching skills, Assessment skills…), procedural knowledge (Practical teaching, knowledge assessment…), Interactive knowledge (Interaction with the manager, interaction with office…),managerial and planning knowledge (Leadership and management of class…), technological knowledge (Computer and Internet knowledge).
Keywords: Cognitive knowledge, Proficiency knowledge, Procedural knowledge, Interactive knowledge, Managerial & Planning knowledge, Technological knowledge

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Procedural knowledge
  • Interactive knowledge
  • Managerial & Planning knowledge
  • Technological knowledge

Abbasi, R., Babashahi, J., Afkhami, A., & Farahani, D. (2013). An investigation into the effect of flexibility of human resource management on organizational entrepreneurship: Explain the mediating role of adaptation culture, Journal of Organizational Culture Management, 3 (11), 87 - 106. [Persian]

Ahmadi, S. A., & Salehi, A. (2011). Knowledge management from idea to practice, Tehran: Payame-Noor university publication. [Persian]

Alvani, M. & Danaeifard, H. (2001). Discourses about philosophy of theories of governmental organizations, Tehran: Saffar Publishing co. [Persian]

Amin Bidokhty, A., Makvand Hosseini, S., & Ehsani, Z. (2011). The relationship between organizational culture and knowledge management in the Education Organization of Semnan. Quarterly of Strategy (Rahbord), 20 (59), 191-216. [Persian]

Beltran-Martin, I., Roca-Puig, V., Escrig-Tena, A., & Bou-Liusar, J. C. (2008). Human resource flexibility as a mediating variable between high performance work systems and performance. Journal of Management, 34 (5), 1009-1044.

Bhattacharya, M., Gibson, D. E., & Doty, D. H. (2005). The effects of flexibility in employee skills, employee behaviors, and human resource practices on firm performance. Journal of Management, 31 (4), 622–640.

Bjekic, D., Krneta, R., & Milosevic, D. (2010). Teacher education from E-learner to E-Teacher: Master Curriculum. Journal of Educational Technology, 9, 202- 212.

Bigdeli, F. (2011). Providing a Model for documenting the experiences of public and private school administrators in Abadan with the knowledge management approach .Unpublished Thesis, Shahid Chamran University of Ahvaz, Department of Educational Sciences. [Persian]

Gagne, E. D. (1985). The cognitive psychology of school learning, Boston: Little Brown and company.

Hassanzadeh, M., Teymuri Tabbyeh, M. (2015). Knowledge fluidity for Tehran science and technology Park Companies, Preparing a model, Quarterly Journal of Knowledge Studies, 1 (2), 21-39. [Persian]

Hapasalo, L., & Kadigevich, Dg. (2000). Two Types of Mathematical Knowledge and Their Relation. Journal fur Matheatic- idaktic 21 (2), 139-157.

Hersey, P. & Blanchard, K.H. (2000). Management of organizational behavior (Translated by Ali Alagheband), Tehran: Amir Kabir Publication Co.

Hong, J-C., & Jeou. S. H., & Chan-L, L., & Lih-J, C. (2008). Competency disparity between pre-service teacher education and in-service teaching requirements in Taiwan, International Journal of Educational Development, 28 (1), 4-20.

Hoy, W., & Miskel, C. (2013). Educational Administration: Theory, Research, and Practice, Mc Graw Hill co.

Huntly, H. (2003). Teacher’s Work: Beginning Teacher’s Conceptions of Competence, Thesis, and Central Queensland University.

Jafari, M., Akhavan, P., Hasnavi, R., & Abasaltian, A. (2012). Investigating the relationship between the psychological characteristics of individuals and the dimensions of personal knowledge management, Quarterly Journal of Human Resource Management Researches of Imam Hossein University (AS), 4 (2), 1-21. [Persian]

Jorabchi, M., & Khosravi, A. (2009). The Effect of Knowledge Management on Performance of Secondary School Teachers in Tehran, Quarterly Journal of New Thoughts in Educational Sciences, 5 (17), 135-154. [Persian]

Karimi, F. (2008). Study of professional qualifications of elementary teachers, Quarterly Journal of Educational Leadership and Management, 2 (4), 151 - 166. [Persian]

Khakpoor, A. (2014). Organizational Knowledge Management, Tehran: Asare Fekr Publications Co. [Persian]

McInerney, R., & Koening, M. (2011). Knowledge management (KM) pricesses inorganizations: theoretical foundations and practice. Cambridge University press.

Mohammadian Roushan, S., & Goudarzvand Chgini, M. (2011). Information technology and its impacts on the structure of the organization, the first regional conference of new approaches in engineering and information technology, Islamic Azad University Roodsar and Amlash. [Persian]

Molleman, E., & Slomp, J. (1999). Functional flexibility and team performance. International Journal of Production Research, 37 (8), 1837–1858.

Mousavian, S. R. (2015). Identify the documenting and transferring methods of experience (professional) of faculty members to the University of Isfahan. Quarterly Journal of Human Resources Management Studies, 7 (3), 227-254. (In Persian).

Nazarpari, A., & Rahimi Aghdam, S. (2015). Investigating the Relationship between organizational Intelligence and Flexibility of human resources in knowledge based organizations, Journal of the Governmental Management, 7 (2), 373-392. [Persian]

Nazarzadeh, M. (2018). Identification of Obstacles of the Faculty Members’ International Interactions: A Qualitative Approach, Journal of Educational Sciences, 25 (2), 179-196. (In Persian).

Neysi, A., & Namaki, A. (2010). An investigation into knowledge sharing and organizational learning,Journal of Educational Sciences, 17 (2), 171-179. [Persian]

Niknami, M., & Karimi, F. (2009). Professional qualifications of teachers in public education; developing a proper perceptual framework, Journal of Knowledge and Research in Education-Curriculum, 23, 1-22. [Persian]

Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (1978). The External Control of Organizations: A Resource Dependence Perspective, New York: Haper & Row.

Rahimi, H. & Najafi M. (2007). Knowledge management in educational Organization, Tehran: Javdaneh publication co. [Persian]

Selvi, K. (2010).Teacher competencies. International Journal of Philosophy of Culture and Axiology, VII (1), 167-175.

Seyednaghavi, M., Haghighi Kafash, M., & Najafi keliani, V. (2012). Human resource flexibility and organizational performance in Industry Insurance. Quarterly Journal of Management Studies, 2 (67), 129-153. [Persian]

Sarrafzade, M. (2009). Some educational and research functions of blogs, Electronic Journal of Information and Documentation Research Institute of Iran (NAMA), 5 (1), October 22, 2005. [Persian]

Tajeddini, U., Sadatmousavi, A. & Bab al-Haveji, F. (2015). Knowledge and knowledge translator, Tehran: Ketabdar publication co. [Persian]

Tajeddini, U., Sadatmousavi, A., & Shabani, A. (2010). Knowledge Management in the Age of Web 2: An Evolutionary Approach. Journal of Research in Library and Information Science, 51, 101-119. [Persian]

Twati, J. M., & Gammack J. G. (2006). The impact of organizational culture innovation on the adoption of IS/IT”, Journal of Enterprise Information Management, 19 (2), 175-191.

Villega, R. (2007). Teacher professional development: an international review of the literature.Unesco; international institute for educational planning.

Wu, M., & Lin, S. C. (2011) .Teacher’s Professional Growth: Study on Professional (Pedagogical) Competency Development of Teachers in Junior Colleges/Universities of Technology, The Journal of American Academy of Business, 16 (2), 197-217.

Young-Ybarra, C., & Wiersema, M. (1999). Strategic flexibility in information technology alliances: the influence of transaction cost economics and social exchange theory, Organization Science, 10 (4), 439–459.

Zare, N. (2014). An investigation into good teachers characteristics from high school and teacher training centers students of Yazd, Unpublished MS thesis, Al-Zahra University. [Persian]